
Rich Hill PIndiansIndians Player Cards | Indians Team Audit | Indians Depth Chart |
| IP | ERA | WHIP | SO | W | L | SV | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subscribe today for access to projection data! | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| YEAR | TEAM | AGE | G | GS | IP | IP-SP | IP-RP | W | L | SV | BS | QS | BQS | PA | H | R | ER | HR | TB | BB | UBB | HBP | SO | ERA | FIP | FRA | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | CHN | 25 | 10 | 4 | 23.7 | 15.3 | 8.3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 115 | 25 | 24 | 24 | 3 | 40 | 17 | 16 | 1 | 21 | 9.13 | 5.15 | 5.62 | 1.5 | 0.1 |
| 2006 | CHN | 26 | 17 | 16 | 99.3 | 97.3 | 2.0 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 417 | 83 | 51 | 46 | 16 | 154 | 39 | 38 | 2 | 90 | 4.17 | 4.63 | 5.13 | 12.8 | 1.1 |
| 2007 | CHN | 27 | 32 | 32 | 195.0 | 195.0 | 0.0 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 812 | 170 | 89 | 85 | 27 | 285 | 63 | 60 | 12 | 183 | 3.92 | 4.25 | 4.66 | 24.7 | 2.4 |
| 2008 | CHN | 28 | 5 | 5 | 19.7 | 19.7 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 89 | 13 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 22 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 15 | 4.12 | 5.80 | 6.39 | -0.5 | -0.1 |
| 2009 | BAL | 29 | 14 | 13 | 57.7 | 57.3 | 0.3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 275 | 68 | 53 | 50 | 7 | 112 | 40 | 38 | 1 | 46 | 7.80 | 5.26 | 6.12 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | BOS | 30 | 6 | 0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 3.04 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| 2011 | BOS | 31 | 9 | 0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 0.00 | 1.56 | 2.50 | 2.0 | 0.2 |
| 2012 | BOS | 32 | 25 | 0 | 19.7 | 0.0 | 19.7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 25 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 21 | 1.83 | 2.59 | 3.40 | 3.3 | 0.3 |
| 2013 | CLE | 33 | 26 | 0 | 17.3 | 0.0 | 17.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 22 | 17 | 15 | 3 | 33 | 12 | 10 | 1 | 20 | 7.79 | 5.24 | 5.38 | -1.6 | -0.2 |
| Career | 144 | 70 | 444.3 | 384.7 | 59.7 | 23 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 2 | 1924 | 406 | 247 | 233 | 58 | 679 | 204 | 194 | 19 | 411 | 4.72 | 4.48 | 5.01 | 43.3 | 4.0 | ||
| YEAR | Team | Lg | G | GS | IP | FRA | FRA+ | TAv | oppAVG | oppOBP | oppSLG | oppTAv | BABIP | PPF | PVORP | PWARP | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | BOI | A- | 6 | 5 | 14.0 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .341 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2003 | LNS | A | 15 | 4 | 29.3 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .280 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2003 | BOI | A- | 14 | 14 | 68.3 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .344 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2004 | DAY | A+ | 28 | 19 | 109.3 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .296 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2005 | CHN | MLB | 10 | 4 | 23.7 | 5.62 | 82 | .279 | .271 | .340 | .436 | .268 | .301 | 104 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 0.1 |
| 2005 | PEO | A | 1 | 1 | 8.0 | 2.33 | 155 | .123 | .277 | .354 | .414 | .275 | .312 | 109 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 | WTN | AA | 10 | 10 | 57.7 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | -.270 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2005 | IOW | AAA | 11 | 10 | 65.0 | 3.45 | 133 | .210 | .283 | .357 | .455 | .275 | .298 | 102 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 | CHN | MLB | 17 | 16 | 99.3 | 5.13 | 98 | .240 | .275 | .341 | .450 | .265 | .248 | 103 | 12.7 | 1.2 | 12.8 | 1.1 |
| 2006 | IOW | AAA | 15 | 15 | 100.2 | 2.29 | 147 | .175 | .270 | .338 | .416 | .269 | .273 | 97 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 | CHN | MLB | 32 | 32 | 195.0 | 4.66 | 104 | .241 | .274 | .340 | .446 | .267 | .271 | 101 | 24.9 | 2.4 | 24.7 | 2.4 |
| 2008 | CHN | MLB | 5 | 5 | 19.7 | 6.39 | 77 | .252 | .274 | .344 | .451 | .272 | .208 | 111 | 0.1 | 0.0 | -0.5 | -0.1 |
| 2008 | DAY | A+ | 3 | 3 | 12.3 | 5.16 | 99 | .255 | .253 | .325 | .359 | .250 | .364 | 109 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 | IOW | AAA | 7 | 7 | 26.0 | 7.33 | 43 | .304 | .277 | .349 | .445 | .277 | .295 | 97 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 | CUB | Rk | 3 | 3 | 9.3 | 5.59 | 78 | .215 | .265 | .363 | .379 | .272 | .238 | 96 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 | BAL | MLB | 14 | 13 | 57.7 | 6.12 | 73 | .303 | .278 | .345 | .448 | .276 | .337 | 100 | 0.2 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| 2009 | FRD | A+ | 1 | 1 | 3.0 | 2.30 | 153 | .075 | .266 | .354 | .432 | .276 | .143 | 108 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 | NOR | AAA | 3 | 3 | 13.3 | 5.21 | 80 | .184 | .270 | .335 | .387 | .256 | .143 | 95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | BOS | MLB | 6 | 0 | 4.0 | 3.04 | 135 | .226 | .263 | .337 | .400 | .265 | .357 | 105 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| 2010 | MEM | AAA | 23 | 4 | 46.0 | 6.68 | 66 | .263 | .282 | .357 | .450 | .275 | .265 | 96 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | PAW | AAA | 19 | 6 | 53.0 | 4.77 | 83 | .236 | .266 | .335 | .416 | .257 | .307 | 91 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 | BOS | MLB | 9 | 0 | 8.0 | 2.50 | 148 | .138 | .265 | .331 | .414 | .268 | .214 | 107 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 0.2 |
| 2011 | PAW | AAA | 10 | 0 | 16.0 | 4.70 | 96 | .175 | .258 | .336 | .407 | .256 | .115 | 101 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | BOS | MLB | 25 | 0 | 19.7 | 3.40 | 128 | .243 | .259 | .325 | .425 | .272 | .333 | 107 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 0.3 |
| 2012 | GRN | A | 2 | 2 | 2.0 | -0.77 | 216 | .000 | .274 | .353 | .403 | .285 | .667 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2012 | SLM | A+ | 3 | 3 | 4.0 | -0.89 | 219 | .000 | .256 | .319 | .371 | .249 | .200 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2012 | PME | AA | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | -1.71 | 239 | .000 | .262 | .326 | .374 | .250 | .333 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2012 | PAW | AAA | 8 | 0 | 8.0 | 3.91 | 114 | .158 | .262 | .333 | .388 | .248 | .133 | 92 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | RSX | Rk | 2 | 1 | 1.3 | 4.88 | 67 | .171 | .248 | .294 | .338 | .244 | .000 | 87 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 | CLE | MLB | 26 | 0 | 17.3 | 5.38 | 69 | .337 | .262 | .327 | .408 | .270 | .388 | 96 | -1.6 | -0.2 | -1.6 | -0.2 |
| Career | MLB | 70 | 444.3 | 5.02 | 96 | .255 | .273 | .340 | .443 | .268 | .282 | 102 | 43.5 | 4.3 | 43.0 | 4.0 | ||
| Year | Team | Lg | W | L | SV | G | GS | IP | H | BB | SO | HR | GB% | BABIP | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | WHIP | ERA | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | BOI | A- | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 14.0 | 15 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 0% | .341 | 9.6 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 7.7 | 2.07 | 8.36 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 | LNS | A | 0 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 29.3 | 14 | 36 | 50 | 0 | 0% | .280 | 4.3 | 11.1 | 0.0 | 15.4 | 1.71 | 2.76 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 | BOI | A- | 1 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 14 | 68.3 | 57 | 32 | 99 | 5 | 0% | .344 | 7.5 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 13.0 | 1.30 | 4.35 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 | DAY | A+ | 7 | 6 | 0 | 28 | 19 | 109.3 | 88 | 72 | 136 | 9 | 0% | .296 | 7.2 | 5.9 | 0.7 | 11.2 | 1.46 | 4.03 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 | PEO | A | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8.0 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 56% | .312 | 5.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 0.62 | 1.12 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 | IOW | AAA | 6 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 10 | 65.0 | 53 | 14 | 92 | 11 | 44% | .298 | 7.3 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 12.7 | 1.03 | 3.60 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 | WTN | AA | 4 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 57.7 | 42 | 21 | 90 | 9 | 0% | -.270 | 6.6 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 14.0 | 1.09 | 3.28 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 | CHN | MLB | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 23.7 | 25 | 17 | 21 | 3 | 39% | .301 | 9.5 | 6.5 | 1.1 | 8.0 | 1.77 | 9.13 | 1.5 | 0.1 |
| 2006 | IOW | AAA | 7 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 100.2 | 62 | 21 | 135 | 3 | 48% | .273 | 5.6 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 12.1 | 0.83 | 1.80 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 | CHN | MLB | 6 | 7 | 0 | 17 | 16 | 99.3 | 83 | 39 | 90 | 16 | 33% | .248 | 7.5 | 3.5 | 1.4 | 8.2 | 1.23 | 4.17 | 12.8 | 1.1 |
| 2007 | CHN | MLB | 11 | 8 | 0 | 32 | 32 | 195.0 | 170 | 63 | 183 | 27 | 39% | .271 | 7.8 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 8.4 | 1.19 | 3.92 | 24.7 | 2.4 |
| 2008 | CUB | Rk | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9.3 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 71% | .238 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 10.6 | 1.08 | 2.90 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 | IOW | AAA | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 26.0 | 22 | 28 | 32 | 4 | 42% | .295 | 7.6 | 9.7 | 1.4 | 11.1 | 1.92 | 5.88 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 | DAY | A+ | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12.3 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 0 | 36% | .364 | 8.8 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 10.2 | 1.87 | 8.05 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 | CHN | MLB | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 19.7 | 13 | 18 | 15 | 2 | 36% | .208 | 5.9 | 8.2 | 0.9 | 6.9 | 1.58 | 4.12 | -0.5 | -0.1 |
| 2009 | NOR | AAA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 13.3 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 1 | 45% | .143 | 3.4 | 6.1 | 0.7 | 9.5 | 1.05 | 1.35 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 | FRD | A+ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 57% | .143 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 0.33 | 3.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 | BAL | MLB | 3 | 3 | 0 | 14 | 13 | 57.7 | 68 | 40 | 46 | 7 | 35% | .337 | 10.6 | 6.2 | 1.1 | 7.2 | 1.87 | 7.80 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | MEM | AAA | 4 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 4 | 46.0 | 35 | 30 | 47 | 5 | 44% | .265 | 6.8 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 9.2 | 1.41 | 4.30 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | PAW | AAA | 3 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 6 | 53.0 | 45 | 29 | 55 | 3 | 49% | .307 | 7.6 | 4.9 | 0.5 | 9.3 | 1.40 | 3.74 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | BOS | MLB | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 4.0 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 57% | .357 | 11.2 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 6.8 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| 2011 | BOS | MLB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 8.0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 36% | .214 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 2.0 | 0.2 |
| 2011 | PAW | AAA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 16.0 | 8 | 5 | 18 | 1 | 41% | .115 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 10.1 | 0.81 | 1.12 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | RSX | Rk | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1.3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 100% | .000 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 0.0 | 20.2 | 1.50 | 13.50 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | PAW | AAA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8.0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 50% | .133 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 11.2 | 0.62 | 1.12 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | SLM | A+ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4.0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 100% | .200 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | PME | AA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33% | .333 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | BOS | MLB | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 19.7 | 17 | 11 | 21 | 0 | 43% | .333 | 7.8 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 1.42 | 1.83 | 3.3 | 0.3 |
| 2012 | GRN | A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 67% | .667 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 22.5 | 1.00 | 4.50 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 | CLE | MLB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 17.3 | 22 | 12 | 20 | 3 | 33% | .388 | 11.4 | 6.2 | 1.6 | 10.4 | 1.96 | 7.79 | -1.6 | -0.2 |
| Date On | Date Off | Transaction | Days | Games | Side | Body Part | Injury | Severity | Surgery Date | Reaggravation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-06-09 | 2012-09-01 | 60-DL | 84 | 75 | Left | Forearm | Strain | Flexor Pronator Mass | - | - |
| 2012-03-26 | 2012-04-27 | 15-DL | 32 | 18 | Left | Elbow | Recovery From Surgery | Tommy John Surgery | 2011-06-09 | - |
| 2011-06-02 | 2011-09-29 | 60-DL | 119 | 106 | Left | Elbow | Surgery | Tommy John Surgery | 2011-06-09 | |
| 2009-07-28 | 2009-10-05 | 60-DL | 69 | 64 | Left | Shoulder | Surgery | Labrum | 2009-08-07 | |
| 2009-03-29 | 2009-05-16 | 15-DL | 48 | 36 | Left | Elbow | Strain | - | ||
| 2009-03-01 | 2009-03-29 | Camp | 28 | 0 | Left | Elbow | Stiffness | with Mild Swelling | - | |
| 2008-09-01 | 2008-10-05 | 15-DL | 34 | 24 | Low Back | Strain | - | |||
| 2008-08-31 | 2008-09-01 | Minors | 1 | 0 | - | Back | Strain | - | - | |
| 2008-08-01 | 2008-08-31 | Minors | 30 | 0 | - | Back | Strain | - | - | |
| 2008-06-22 | 2008-07-16 | Minors | 24 | 0 | Left | Lower Leg | Strain | Calf | - | - |
| 2008-05-17 | 2008-05-30 | Minors | 13 | 0 | Low Back | Strain | - |
Compensation
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Rich Hill is referenced in the following articles.
requires BP Premium access to view,
requires BP Premium or BP Fantasy access to view
| Date | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| 2010-03-17 14:00:00 | Cardinals pitching prospect Jaime Garcia has looked downright evil this spring, but doesn't seem to be in serious consideration for the rotation, which definitely has a vacancy. What's going on, Christina? Flash-in-the-pan syndrome? Justifiable desire to hold the workload down for a TJ survivor? Or a noxious manifestation of Dave Duncan's aversion to working with young pitchers, particularly starters? (Bill from New Mexico) | Hi Bill, always a pleasure to see you on the boards... I think it's very much a matter of politburo-style turnitis, in that it isn't his turn yet. He's having a great camp, he's coming back from injury, and especially because of April scheduling, I could see him spending the first month or two getting regular starts for Memphis. By June, we'll know if McClellan's calling for reinforcements (inevitable, if you ask any Civil War buff), or if Rich Hill's redeemable and that's just in the fifth spot. Duncan's deserved reputation or no, I'm just not that wild on bets that Kyle Lohse and Brad Penny will be totally fine, so I think Garcia's going to be put to work at some point this season. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2009-06-25 13:00:00 | From among Beresen, Hill and Berked in the Orioles' rotation, which do you think will perform the best long term? (TGisriel from Baltimore) | Still a big Rich Hill believer, and he's the only one of the three that misses a lot of bats. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2009-02-16 14:00:00 | Over, under, or even: Rich Hill wins 5 games for Baltimore in 2009? (Jack from Baltimore) | Under. (Kevin Goldstein) |
| 2009-02-11 14:00:00 | Two pitchers that many had pegged for positive growth (if not breakouts) last season, were Ian Snell and Rich Hill. Do you see bounce-backs for either of them in 2009, or is mediocrity all that can be hoped for? (Joe from Brooklyn) | I think the change of scenery will help Hill. Snell is a hard guy to figure, talented but flighty. He could literally win 18 games this season or wind up in Indianapolis. (John Perrotto) |
| 2008-11-19 13:00:00 | Any chance for Rich Hill to ever turn it around? What happened? (Jake from Chicago) | Has anyone come back from Steve Blass Syndrome? (Will Carroll) |
| 2008-07-25 14:00:00 | Joe, what happened to Rich Hill, and when/where will he be spotted again? (Eric from MD) | He insists it's not mental, just mechanical. I doubt we'll see him in the majors this season, even as a September call-up, and I think his next MLB appearance will be with a team other than the Cubs. Medium term, I like the talent and I think he'll pitch well again. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2008-06-26 13:00:00 | I like the potential trade series. How realistic do you think the following scenario could be: Jays send AJ Burnett and one of Shannon Stewart / Brad Wilkerson to the Cubs for Rich Hill and Matt Murton? Can that be a great way to kill 4 birds with one stone, or what? (rawagman from TO) | In making such a deal, the Cubs would make themselves measurably worse. I say go for it! (Dayn Perry) |
| 2008-06-27 14:00:00 | Given that Theriot's performance has likely entrenched him in the starting lineup, and Ronny Cedeno's performance seemingly has him getting the lion-share of middle infield spot starts, what is Mike Fontenot's use now? Does he have any value in a trade? He seems like he could possibly bring the offensive value of Mark Derosa if he got the playing time.
Also, what does Rich Hill have to do in order to return to the majors? Change teams? (mlapointe from chicago) | Fontenot's getting starts at second with DeRosa moving out to left in the positional wheel that Piniella has been employing whenever his roster's Soriano-free, and it works pretty nicely. Add in that it means that he's got a bench player kept sharp with a goodly amount of playing time, and it makes for a better stabbity to go after the opposition with when he's back to pinch-hitting. And if Theriot or Cedeno or DeRosa goes down, it's a happier thing to be the team that still has Fontenot. He'd make for a mediocre regular, and while that might make him wealthy, I think it's more useful to keep him on this roster, especially as the lefty alternative to the righty-hitting Reed Johnson off of the bench.
Hill... it's a gut-wrenching thing to see a guy's control just go away like that. I'd trade for him, but I'm not sure the Cubs can afford to trust him until he gives Iowa a good month or so. It's interesting that Will brought up the Cubs in today's lead article about dealing for Sabathia--I would think that Hill would make a pretty important piece in such a swap, although it would be a bit risky to have both Cliff Lee and Hill in the same rotation. That would be sort of a southpaw roller-coaster ride that would require splatter shielding to protect bystanders. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2008-06-24 13:00:00 | Rich Hill in pinstripes? (Vito from NY) | I've thought a lot about that. He's at the project stage right now, but the upside is high. ...Now my son (2) is crying. (Steven Goldman) |
| 2008-06-23 12:00:00 | Hi John, have you heard if any other teams are interested in Rich Hill? I am curious if his trade value is higher or lower than Sean Marshall's. Thanks. (Guancous from Silver Spring, MD) | I think a small-market club would be perfect for Hill. He's got an awful lot of talent but it's clear that he has lost the faith of Lou Piniella. Put him in a low-pressure environment and he could easily put his career back together. Yes, I think Hill has more value than Marshall simply because he has a higher ceiling, though I also think Marshall has a chance to be a good major-league starter. (John Perrotto) |
| 2008-06-23 12:00:00 | How strange is the saga of Rich Hill this season? While perhaps not unprecedented, this whole situation just seems like one of the more bizarre collapses I can ever recall a successful starting pitcher experiencing. (Brent from Raleigh) | It's very strange. Again, Lou Piniella is a demanding manager and some guys get psyched out by him. I think Rich Hill is still a very good bet to have a good career. He just needs to get in a differet environment. (John Perrotto) |
| 2008-06-23 12:00:00 | Over the weekend, Rich Hill failed to make it out of the first inning - IN IOWA. He even had a throwing error over to first base. Who broke Rich Hill? Can anyone fix Rich Hill? (theguag from Louisville) | I think he's fixable, just somewhere other than the Cubs. If I ran a club, I'd love to get my hands on him, especially if I could buy low right now. (John Perrotto) |
| 2008-06-20 13:30:00 | Let's go worst-case scenario and say Big Z is out for the year. Should the Cubs trade for A.J. Burnett (or whoever) or give Hill and/or Marshall another shot? (Stephen from Louisville) | Rich Hill is something like the 25th-best starter in the National League. I have no idea what he did to Lou Piniella, but he can take Zambrano's place with minimal loss in value. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2008-06-20 13:30:00 | What are the trade values for Rich Hill and Felix Pie and should/would the Cubs move them? (theguag from Louisville) | Their trade values have been crushed by the organization. They shouldn't trade them, they should play them. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2008-06-03 13:00:00 | You mentioned that you'd like to see the Cubs get another mid-level starter before the deadline. What's your take on Rich Hill maybe being that guy? (Al from Montreal) | I wish it could be him. At this point, he's a long way away from returning. He can't seem to find his command and that's a big problem. (Len Kasper) |
| 2008-05-20 13:00:00 | Three questions:
1) For my Cubs lovin' wife, are the Northsiders for real? They've done well so far, but what are their big questions down the stretch?
2) Is there any light at the end of the Andruw Jones tunnel, or is that the sound of a diesel locomotive?
3) Joe Torre: great manager, or *greatest* manager? Seriously, look at Friday's Dodgers lineup: how could he expect to win? (scareduck from Still closer to Angel Stadium than Chavez Ravine) | Cubs: for real. Their run differential is the best in all of baseball by a wide margin, and I don't see any of the other NL Central teams being able to hang with them. I think the big questions are whether Rich Hill rediscovers his control and returns to the rotation, and whether Kerry Wood can hold up as the team's closer. Barring injuries, I think they'll be OK, and even with those injuries, they have a bit of depth to either cover from within or make a trade to help themselves out.
Andruw: lots of questions about him today. The upside of his injury is that it may explain some of his struggles, it may force him to get back in shape as he rehabs, and it will give Dodger fans a bit of relief when it comes to the daily drama of the outfield lineup. Torre: Furcal being hurt certainly takes a bite out of that lineup. But really, Torre's going to have to get over this Russell Martin-at-3B fetish, even though it's only been a total of 37 innings he's played there. It's fine to give him a breather now and then, but when you're stealing at-bats from DeWitt or LaRoche to give them to Gary Bennett, something is definitely wrong. (Jay Jaffe) |
| 2008-05-05 12:30:00 | With nearly two-third of the season gone, what's your opinion of the compacted schedule? Do you see any teams with advantages or disadvantages in May because of how they built their non-league slate? (BL from Bozeman, MT) | Well, the compacted schedule was sort of inherently flawed in my mind from the beginning. How exactly did a Feb 22 start date help Michigan? If the season had opened three weekends earlier, they might have won a couple more weekends and had a better chance at regionals. It's not as if they were able to play outdoors in Ann Arbor any sooner. However, I do like what this has done to philosophy, and how coaches are being forced to use pitching staffs. One subplot of that I'd point to is USD coach Rich Hill's usage of Kyle Blair and Sammy Solis -- almost mixing and matching them versus different opponents. Of course, four legit starting pitchers gives you options like that. (Bryan Smith) |
| 2008-04-15 13:00:00 | What is going on with Rich Hill, how does this affect his PECOTA?
(tschiera from Brooklyn) | Mechanically, he's pitching uphill and has apparently lost his release point. I have to think there's something more going on there, because that should be relatively easy to correct. Lou has his doghouse and maybe Hill did something to get in there. I'd guess that Hill gets back into the rotation after only a short time. (Will Carroll) |
| 2008-02-25 12:00:00 | Bryan, what in the world happened to Brian Matusz this weekend? (Steve from North Dakota) | A couple questions on this. To me, the most concerning thing from Brian Matusz' start were the four walks he allowed in 4.2 innings. I mean, look, some starts the balls are going to find their holes and you're going to allow 8 hits like that. And even a guy like Nick Romero for SDSU, a very good player, will sometimes hit a home run off an All-American like Matusz. But the walks are a problem that we haven't seen much from the polished southpaw. Big weekend ahead for the Torreros as they host a good tournament, so I might try and get a more thorough answer from Rich Hill before my Thursday article. (Bryan Smith) |
| 2008-01-25 13:30:00 | How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Followup question: Would you rather have Rich Hill for the next four years, or Erik Bedard for the next two? (Rob from Bloomington, IL) | Depends on what else you have and at what part of cycle your team is on, but generally speaking I'd take Hill for 4. (Dan Fox) |
No BP Roundtables have mentioned this guy.
A Collaboration between BrooksBaseball.net and Baseball Prospectus - Pitch classifications provided by Pitch Info LLC
BP Annual Player Comments
The rest of this card is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.
Not a subscriber? Click here for a free card so you can see what's missing.
Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.