CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article The Prospectus Hit Lis... (07/31)
<< Previous Column
Baseball ProGUESTus: T... (07/24)
Next Column >>
Baseball ProGUESTus: T... (08/06)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: ... (07/31)

July 31, 2013

Baseball ProGUESTus

Trade WARP: Evaluating MLB General Managers

by Tim Malone

Most of our writers didn't enter the world sporting an @baseballprospectus.com address; with a few exceptions, they started out somewhere else. In an effort to up your reading pleasure while tipping our caps to some of the most illuminating work being done elsewhere on the internet, we'll be yielding the stage once a week to the best and brightest baseball writers, researchers, and thinkers from outside of the BP umbrella. If you'd like to nominate a guest contributor (including yourself), please drop us a line.

Tim Malone is an ex-engineer/ex-Angeleno with degrees from UCLA and UW in Bioengineering and Biostatistics who lives in the Seattle area with his family. His likes include coconut, peanut butter, tools, and conversations with strangers. His dislikes include runny eggs, bad champagne, mindless repetition, and conversations with strangers. The return of Major League Baseball to Seattle warms his soul.

The emergence of the Wins Above Replacement Player framework as a measure of player performance has greatly facilitated the evaluation of many activities of major-league general managers, including trading. WARP appears to be a stable surrogate for player value, and WARP and its salary cost ($/WARP in millions) serve as a means of evaluating transactions in retrospect.

Some instances of WARP-based trade valuation exist in the MLB blogosphere. In 2008, Dave Cameron of USS Mariner did a prospective analysis of the notorious Erik Bedard for Adam Jones et al. trade implicitly based on WAR/WARP, which proved depressingly prescient. Recently, the trades of Frank Wren were analyzed from a net-WAR perspective. Global evaluation of GMs has been addressed by Baseball Prospectus’ Shawn Hoffman and Rebecca Glass, among others.

WARP via trade (trWARP) used here is defined as the cumulative player WARP accrued by a franchise (or its partner) consequent to the trade, but attributable to the year of the trade. More specifically, trWARP accrues as of the trade date and continues until the player attains free agency, is traded again, or retires/is released. Thus, a GM’s “WARP report card” illustrated here will not be complete until the last player traded under his regime attains one of these states. (WARP accrued in arbitration years subsequent to the trade is included in trWARP. A subsequent analysis might exclude WARP from arbitration years, which would almost certainly yield more extreme $/WARP values.)

Trade WARP is one component of the three-legged GM stool, along with WARP from free agent (faWARP) and draft (drWARP) activities.

  • Unlike the draft or free agent cases, a trade can be directly evaluated by summing up the net WARP exchanged (Received - Given). In a chosen time period, or exclusively within a given cohort, aggregate WARP given equals WARP received. This zero-sum property enables double entry checking and analysis of net WARP exchanged within these closed systems. All else being equal, positive net trWARP is good. Also, trading between MLB GMs is a more “fair” competition than free agency moves, which favor rich franchises, or than drafting, which favors recently unsuccessful ones. Unless otherwise specified, all WARP described in this article is trWARP.
  • Similar to trWARP, faWARP can be evaluated immediately after the transaction, but free agent market efficiencies would certainly yield fewer $/WARP outliers, and faWARP relative to a period standard should be used, as opposed to the implicitly zero-referenced trWARP.
  • Although draft WARP efficiency differentials undoubtedly persist between franchises/GMs, analysis is complicated in that the drWARP report card is delayed by the prospect incubation period.

Data Sources & Assumptions

  • Transaction Data: Retrosheet
  • Annual Player WARP: Baseball Prospectus
  • Annual Player Salary: Baseball-Reference
  • Name Convention Reconciliation: Lahman
  • GM Tenures: Input from public sources (i.e., Wikipedia)
  • Team Payroll Data (since 2000) from Cot’s Contracts

This analysis includes trades between January 1, 1990 and the end of the 2012 season, and focuses on GMs with three or more years with their current teams as of the end of the 2012 season. Although WARP in this period is essentially time-invariant, the salary cost per WARP ($/WARP in millions) is not, and has been increasing about five percent per year over the past 10 years, to its current level of approximately $5M-$5.5M for free agent transactions. In this article, unless otherwise specified, the $/WARP values for each GM have been adjusted to 2012 levels, assuming the five-percent annual increase. Analysis of salary data is further complicated by arbitration-driven contract resets in which free agency is avoided. As previously mentioned, I am unaware of a database containing individual player contract status beyond the past few years (Cot’s has individual MLB player contracts from 2006).

Results and Discussion

Table 1. Active GMs (as of 11/01/2012), sorted by net consequent trWARP/Year (descending)



Tenure (yrs)


WARP/Yr Fran [2]

WARP/Yr Part [3]

WARP/​Yr Net

$/WARP Franchise adj[4]

$/WARP Partner adj[4]

$/WARP Net adj[4]

Avg Payroll $M[5]





























































































































































































































Incomplete (less than 3 years of service)
















































































































[1] As of end of 2012 season

[2] The GM’s Franchise

[3] All of the Franchise GM’s Trading Partners

[4] $Millions/trWARPadjusted to 2012 salary levels

[5] $Millions/Yr over tenureadjusted to 2012 salary levels

Net Trading Economy and Efficiency

Andrew Friedman is alone in the upper-right quadrant, at the top in net $/WARP and near the leader (Dombrowski) in net WARP/yr, who pays out $2.5M more for WARP than his partners. Moore, Cashman, and especially Huntington occupy the opposite quadrant. In particular, Huntington and Moore aren’t doing their respective small-market franchises any favors in losing the $/WARP exchange. The patterns of Anthopoulos and Hill, as net WARP losers but $/WARP winners, however, are consistent with a budget-constrained franchise being unable or unwilling to retain more expensive talent.

Transaction Efficiency and Frequency

There is a weak inverse relationship between transaction frequency and net WARP/yr that is not statistically significant (p=.08) at the p=.05 level. This is consistent with the intuitive notion that skilled traders are more selective deal-makers. This cohort’s average number of transactions is 6.4 per year, with the Rockies’ Dan O’Dowd the most active at 8.9 per year and the Cardinals’ John Mozeliak the least active at 3.2 per year.

In their first years, these GMs average 9.3 transactions, compared to 6.1 in subsequent years. This early roster reconfiguration is even more striking, considering that the beginning of the first year is an acclimatization period in which assessments should precede personnel moves.

Payroll Constraints

Not surprisingly, trading economy is influenced by team payroll, as the more affluent teams are more willing/able to take on more expensive trWARP. The trend is visually indicated in Figure 4 above. For the entire eligible cohort of 20 GMs, the regression’s p-value is .09, but if the “outlier” Huntington is removed, the fit is significant at p<.02. Conversely, Figure 5 indicates that there is no statistical relationship between the cost of outbound WARP and team payroll. On both Figures 4 and 5, the average $/WARP ($3.1M) and average 2012-adjusted payroll ($98M) are shown. The $3.1M per WARP acquired via trade is significantly cheaper than the accepted value of open market faWARP (over $5M).

Active GMs are better traders than the GMs they replaced
The current cohort of GMs (including those with less than three years with their current franchise) netted +75.6 trWARP—calculated as received minus given. By the zero-sum property, all previous cohorts evaluated since 1990 amassed -75.6 trWARP. Perhaps the current cohort is more “saber aware” than its predecessors. Only four of the previous cohort’s 30 GMs (Dipoto, Alderson, Hoyer, and Jocketty) were employed as GMs at the end of 2012, and none has been an exceptional trader. The cohort immediately preceding accrued -42.2 trWARP. This result might be misleading—if Mariners GM Bill Bavasi’s misadventures (-113.5) are excluded, the previous cohort netted +71.3 trWARP. It should also be noted that of the net +75.6 trWARP amassed by the current cohort, 69 percent, or +52.0 trWARP, was attributable to its trades with Bavasi (more later).

trWARP Depletion and Replenishment
How quickly can GMs reasonably expect to accumulate WARP via trade? Of current GMs with more than two years' experience, three are very high performers in terms of trWARP/Year—Dombrowski (DET) +5.3, Amaro (PHI) +5.3. and Friedman (TBA) +4.7. All else being equal, a trade-savvy GM inheriting a mediocre roster can expect a playoff contender no sooner than a two-year time frame via trade activities. Rounding out the bottom of the list: Huntington (PIT) -5.8, Moore (KCA) -5.0, Cashman (NYA) -3.2, Hill (MIA) -2.7, and Anthopoulos (TOR) -2.6.

Individual GM Snapshots

The numbers listed after each GM follow Table 1

  • (trWARP/Yr Franchise:$M/WARP Franchise) vs. (trWARP/Yr Partners: $M/WARP Partners).
  • $M/WARP and payroll values are 2012-adjusted, assuming a 5% annual increase.

The Good

Tigers — Dave Dombrowski (+9.3:$4.3M) vs (+4.0:$1.8M)

No GM has been a more consistent trWARP winner than Detroit’s Dave Dombrowski. Over an 11-year span, he has averaged +5.3 WARP/year, with multiple years of capturing significant +WARP while parting with little in return. In 2004, he was +22.0 WARP (+21.8 Franchise vs -0.2 Partners) courtesy of Carlos Guillen via Bill Bavasi. In 2005, he was +15.2 (+15.3 vs 0.1), largely due to Placido Polanco at +11.1. In 2007, +9.8 (+26.1 vs +16.3), scoring huge on Miguel Cabrera’s +26.6, while parting with Jair Jurrjens’ +10.9. In 2009, his trades yielded +8.8 (+19.2 vs +10.4), netting Austin Jackson (+11.2) and Max Scherzer (+6.6) while parting with Curtis Granderson (+11.3). It is interesting, however, that Dombrowski’s $/WARP differential (-$2.5M) is among the cohort’s worst. His partners have benefited from very inexpensive trWARP ($1.8M)—only Jocketty ($1.5M) and Daniels ($1.7M) have parted with cheaper WARP. The Tigers have made the playoffs three times during Dombrowski’s 11-year stint, and twice over the last five. The average Tigers payroll of $115M exceeds the MLB average of $98M, and allows Dombrowski to pay $2.5M more per win than his trading partners.

Phillies — Ruben Amaro, Jr. (+6.5:$3.5M) vs (+1.2:$4.2M)

Amaro’s trWARP story is dominated by the acquisition of Roy Halladay from Toronto in 2010, yielding +11.6 WARP over three years. Including his injury-truncated 2012, Halladay’s WARP came in around the free agent market cost (2012 dollars) of $58.3M or $5.0M/WARP. In addition, Roy Oswalt contributed +3.9 WARP and Hunter Pence +3.1. Trading partners might think twice before consummating trades with the current Phillies GM, as they acquire a bottom-of-the-cohort +1.2 WARP/yr (at $4.2M) compared to Amaro’s +6.6 WARP/yr (at $3.5M). The Phillies have been a big-payroll organization during Amaro’s four-year tenure, averaging $160M, and a successful one, averaging 93 wins and reaching the playoffs in three of the last four years.

Rays — Andrew Friedman (+8.7:$1.3M) vs (+4.0:$3.7M)

From Figure 1, Friedman stands alone in combining trading efficiency (+4.7 WARP/yr) and economy (+$2.4M net $/WARP). Friedman’s first two active trade years, 2006 and 2007, were outstanding. In 2006 he was +20.1 (+24.7 vs Partners +4.6), due largely to the contributions of Ben Zobrist at +18.5. The following season, 2007, was also productive, yielding +10.7 WARP(+19.1 vs +8.4), netting Jason Bartlett (+9.1) and Matt Garza (+3.7) along with Grant Balfour (+4.5). Friedman’s trading partners haven’t fared well from a $/WARP standpoint, paying $3.7M per win vs Friedman’s $1.3M. Friedman has averaged 92 wins over the last five years of his seven-year reign, making the playoffs in 2010 and 2011, all with a bottom-three MLB payroll averaging only $56M.

Braves — Frank Wren (+8.1:$2.6M) vs (+4.9:$3.3M)

Overall, Frank Wren has been a solid trader over his five-year tenure with the Braves, beginning in 2007. That first year yielded +16.2 WARP (16.7 vs. 0.5), featuring Jair Jurrjens via Dave Dombrowski (+10.1 WARP at $10.5M), and Omar Infante from the Cubs’ Jim Hendry (+4.3 at $6.3M). Since 2007, however, he has only broken even: +24.1 vs +24.4. The Braves have averaged 86 wins and $101M over the last five years, making the playoffs in 2010.

Athletics – Billy Beane (+11.2:$2.6M) vs (+12.8:$3.1M)
Giants – Brian Sabean (+8.1:$2.6M) vs (+5.5:$3.1M)

While Billy Beane is nearly a wash in terms of net trWARP over his 15-year stint, Mr. Moneyball predictably shines on the bang-for-buck side, paying $2.6/WARP while trading away WARP averaging $3.1M in 2012 dollars. Beane’s long-time counterpart across the bay is Brian Sabean, who began his tenure after the 1996 season, a year before Beane. Sabean has the edge in net WARP/year (Beane at -1.6, Sabean +2.5), but in terms of WARP cost, Beane and Sabean are clones, each paying $2.6M per win compared to their $3.1M for partners. Despite different payroll resources, both teams have been successful. The A’s have made the playoffs six times in 15 years, with a well-below-league-average payroll of $72M over that span. The Giants have won two of the last three World Series and made the playoffs four other times in 16 years, averaging $115M in payroll.

The Bad

Pirates — Neal Huntington (+2.9:$5.3M) vs (+8.7:$2.5M)

Huntington is a payroll-constrained, small-market operator; even so, his trade exploits have not helped the franchise. He has overpaid for the Pirates’ 2.9 WARP/yr received at $5.3M/WARP, and parted with 8.7 WARP/Yr costing a below-market $2.5M. He was bad in his first really active year, 2008, (+1.0 vs +29.1) parting with Jose Bautista’s +21.3 and Jason Bay’s +7.2. On the Pirates' side of the ledger, he was done in by the $26.5M 2012 combined salaries of A.J. Burnett and Wandy Rodriguez, resulting from 2011 activity. These two combined for only +4.2 WARP. Pittsburgh’s dead-last $53M payroll has yielded an average of 67 wins over Huntington’s tenure, with predictably playoff-free results (until 2013, perhaps).

Royals — Dayton Moore (+2.0:$4.4M) vs (+7.0:$2.3M)

Under Moore, the small-market Royals, like Huntington’s Pirates, could be doing better on the trading front. Losing 5.0 WARP/year doesn’t help, nor does paying $2.1M more per WARP than your trading partners. To be fair, Moore’s 2012-adjusted average payroll of $69M is 23rd of 30 in his cohort, which both forces and precludes many trades. On the negative side, in 2008, he parted with Jorge de la Rosa’s 6.6 WARP at $8.5M, and more painfully, in 2010, with Alberto Callaspo’s 7.4 WARP costing only $5.2M. In 2010, the Royals couldn’t hold on to Zack Greinke’s 7.6 WARP, which cost the Brewers $27.6M, and in 2011, Melky Cabrera and his 5.4 2012 WARP went to the Giants for only $6M.

The Ugly

Mariners — Bill Bavasi (+0.6.1:$20.0M) vs (+25.3:$2.1M)

Although he's not a member of the class of current GMs, some of you might be curious about how the perceived poster boy/deceased equine for GM ineptitude fares here. The Seattle Times’ Larry Stone evaluated the trades of Bill Bavasi qualitatively and concluded that “…a lot of deals that backfired, and not much quality in return for the Mariners.” No big surprises here—the numbers support his conclusions. I double-checked the WARP and $ numbers above for transposition errors, and yes, Bavasi hemorrhaged a net -24.7 WARP/year, -113.5 WARP total over four-and-a-half years of unchained franchise destruction. Although frustrated Mariners fans tend to focus on the well-chronicled talent basket that Bavasi traded away (Asdrubal Cabrera, Shin-Soo Choo, Matt Thornton, Carlos Guillen, Randy Winn, Adam Jones, et al.), the absolute dearth of WARP received is perhaps more striking. In exchange for 116.5 departed WARP, Bavasi received a negligible 3.0 WARP, the total payroll cost of which was $60M in 2012 dollars. This equates to a preposterous cost of $20.0M/WARP to the Mariners. Compounding the area’s offseason grey gloom, most of this 116.5 WARP willingly transferred to his trading partners was significantly more cost-controlled than the $3.1M average value of the current cohort—$2.1M/WARP in 2012 dollars. In actual numbers, Bavasi’s average payroll over his 2004-2008 stint was $96M—well above the MLB mean of $83M over that period. Despite these financial resources, the M’s averaged 72 wins, leaving Safeco to the seagulls after September.

You knew the job was dangerous when you took it

Mariners — Jack Zduriencik (+5.0:$5.0M) vs (+6.5:$2.3M)

In addition to drafting and free agent misadventures, it is well accepted that Jack Zduriencik was put in a deep talent hole by his predecessor’s trade escapades. In Jack Z’s first four years, his trading hasn’t aided the M’s recovery, having lost 1.5 WARP/year. Like Frank Wren, he started on a very positive note, and like Wren, he hasn’t followed up that initial success. Since the blockbuster three-way deal that landed Franklin Gutierrez, Jason Vargas, et al. (+13.0 WARP) for J.J. Putz, et al. (-1.0 WARP), Zduriencik’s trades have lost nearly 20 WARP (7.1 in, 27.0 out). Compared to Wren, Jack Z pays out $2.4M more per win ($5.0M vs $2.6M) while partners pay $1M less ($2.3M vs $3.3M). It should be noted that Zduriencik has often traded for defensively oriented players, whose contributions are valued differently by the three major WAR(P) variants. In the Zduriencik era the Mariners’ payroll has averaged $99M—essentially league average. In the near term, the Mariners’ recovery hinges on out-trading and out-drafting their competition.

Good and Bad

Marlins — Michael Hill (+5.9:$1.7M) vs (+8.6:$4.6M)

Michael Hill’s tenure with the Marlins has been interesting. Although he has shed 2.7 net WARP/Year, his WARP cost of $1.7M is a fraction of his partners’ $4.6M. The boom-and-bust Marlins are difficult to analyze consistently, with either great teams (World Series wins in 1997 and 2003) or uncompetitive ones (73 win average excluding those two years). Over the last five years, the Marlins have averaged 78 wins with a paltry $62M average payroll. Hill’s performance makes more sense when viewed through the lens of a payroll-constrained organization.

Blue Jays — Alex Anthopoulos (+7.3:$1.9M) vs (+10.0,$4.8M)

Like Michael Hill, Alex Anthopoulos has done well on salary and not so well on talent in his three years. His trades have resulted in a deficit of 2.7 WARP/year, but like Hill, his WARP has been inexpensive—costing only $1.9M, compared to his partners’ $4.8M. A good fraction of Anthopoulos’s action came in the 2009 blockbuster with the Phillies and Mariners, which has so far yielded little and cost the Jays Roy Halladay’s aforementioned +11.6 WARP. A week later, the Jays and M’s swapped Brandons (League for Morrow), a deal in which Toronto came out +8 WARP ahead (+8.1 versus +0.1). Many have speculated that these two trades were in fact a single trade separated by seven days. The Blue Jays haven’t made the playoffs in recent history, and have averaged an $85M payroll and 80 wins over the last five years, which hasn’t allowed them to compete effectively in the AL East, with its rich and/or smart GMs. Their 2013 payroll, however, has spiked, with disappointing results.

In a League of His Own

Yankees — Brian Cashman (+8.3:$4.6M) vs (+11.4:$2.9M)

Cashman has not been a successful trader, losing 3.2 WARP a year over the same 15-year period as Billy Beane. The two began their stints within three months of each other —Beane in November of 1997 and Cashman in February of 1998. Unlike Beane, however, over that lengthy span, Cashman paid an above-market $4.6M for his WARP versus $2.9M paid by his trading partners and $2.6M for Beane. Since 2000, the average MLB payroll has been $104M and the Yankees’ has been $229M, so Cashman can and has made up trading deficits via free agency. It’s nice to be Daddy WARbucks.

WARP via trade is an important determinant of GM performance and subsequent franchise success. By necessity, this article (over)-attributes all trading activities during a GM’s reign to that GM, as opposed to the entire front office/ownership. Also, and obviously, each franchise perceives a unique comparative advantage. Trade WARP in a vacuum is a blunt tool for GM evaluation, as WARP and its dollar cost are valued differently by contenders and rebuilders and rich and poor franchises. At a minimum, I would have confidence in distinguishing the extremely strong traders (Dombrowski, Friedman, Amaro) from the very weak ones (Bavasi, Cashman, Moore, Huntington). Positional valuations and franchise-specific gaps/redundancies are also factors. Additionally and often unfortunately, upper-management directives and the GM’s own contract status can apparently have a significant impact. Some of these factors might provide for fascinating future studies.

Related Content:  Trades,  Trade Deadline,  General Managers,  GMs

12 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links


Fantastic study.

Jul 31, 2013 08:11 AM
rating: 3

This is fascinating stuff, and I hope a similar analysis will be done for the other two legs of your GM stool, talent acquisition via free-agent signings and the draft. I would point out, however, that there's a fourth leg that's much less obvious but nearly as important: the decision NOT to hurt a team by retaining has-beens and never-wases. An analysis of the "value" lost to teams via non-tenders and releases should also be done if one is to get a decently complete GM report card. Like Kenny Rogers said, "know when to walk away, know when to run."

Jul 31, 2013 09:26 AM
rating: 2

Interesting work, but from a Pirates fan's perspective, this isn't an especially meaningful way of evaluating Huntingdon. Trading away Bautista ended poorly, but after he was traded he passed through waivers and was not claimed. It's a bit silly to penalize NH for not seeing Bautista's breakout coming when the other 29 GMs didn't either. That deal alone skews your data tremendously. Also, you seem to be counting Burnett's and Wandy's full salaries for 2012, but the Yanks and Astros are picking up much of those contracts. I can't conceive of an argument stating that the acquisition of Burnett was anything but extremely helpful. And even if regression hits Locke hard, the McLouth for Morton/Locke/Gorkys Hernandez trade is a clear win for NH as well.

NH could have done much better with the Bay trade, and overall his record is not sterling, but with some context there's no way I'm buying that Huntingdon has been the worst trader in MLB. Not by miles.

Jul 31, 2013 09:59 AM
rating: 5

In order to be completely fair to Huntingdon, you need to factor in the contributions of the Yankees (Burnett) and Astros (Rodriguez) to the salaries of the acquired players. But his evaluation is still going to be bad because of the early trades of Bautista and Bay.

Jul 31, 2013 10:08 AM
rating: 1
Eddie Bajek

Good stuff! I've been trying to compile similar data for years. I look forward to digging into what you've done to see where we differ a bit. No surprise to see Dombrowski atop the tWAR list.

Jul 31, 2013 10:53 AM
rating: 0

For the Twins Terry Ryan, I think you should evaluate his first stint as GM given that he had a long track record for you to examine prior to his second go-round as GM.

Jul 31, 2013 13:20 PM
rating: 1
Eddie Bajek

So does tWARP take into effect the value a player gets if he is traded again? It appears as if it doesn't (and the difficulty I have in quantifying that and gathering the requisite data is why my similar study isn't ready yet). If that is the case, a frequent trader, like a Billy Beane, will end up being underrated as it does not take into effect the value that player provides when cashed in. This also could be the reason that Ruben Amaro rates so highly: he tends to lock players up long term and so the full contribution of those players is accounted for, while Oakland's ability to cash in on guys like Dan Haren (which is still providing WARP in the form of Brett Anderson, Eric Sogard

What I do is total the WAR or WARP up of all the players traded and apportion the recieved WAR based on percentage provided to the other team. This is recursive, tedious, and not accurate for recent prospect trades, but it doesn't truncate a player's value when used later as a chip.

Jul 31, 2013 16:31 PM
rating: 0

I love this analysis, and not just because my guy came out on top. The team has been drafting poorly and losing picks to free agency, but he keeps getting other teams to give him the family cow for his magic beans. Of course it does help that the pizza man gives him a blank check, but you'd have to argue that he's made The most of the resources available to him.

DD biggest challenge may be yet to come. The last time the farm was in this bad a shape they fixed it by offering money over slot to talented guys who fell.for signability issues. That road is closed. I also note two years ago he tried and failed to get James shields because he didn't have enough to offer. As bad general managers get replaced with smarter ones, it'll be harder to defend his top trader title. Plus the pizza money is gonna run out sooner rather than later, and there's some scary contracts on the books

Jul 31, 2013 17:15 PM
rating: 0

Good stuff; dense study that's going to take a couple reads. One thing: In Figure 5, the Cashman point is exercising a lot of leverage in the regression. I'd remove that and rerun. Same with Figure 4, though I bet the change would not be so great because Cashman is more in line with the rest of the data points.

Jul 31, 2013 17:33 PM
rating: 0
Paul Clarke

So if you expand the axes in figure 1 by a factor of 4 in the x direction and 5 in the y direction you'll find Bill Bavasi way down in the bottom left-hand corner. Ouch.

Aug 01, 2013 07:54 AM
rating: 0

Thanks for the feedback.

@Bill J – Going forward, I might partition trWARP into pre and post arbitration/extension. Your post-expiration date WARP would be included in one of those.
@jubus, @CraigB – The point about the Yankees and Astros offsetting the salaries is well taken. I used Baseball Reference for salary data, which didn’t provide prorations, assumptions or splits. Until I get a better source, NH and others similarly affected will be distorted.
@Vanasek – Terry Ryan was as brilliant in his first go-round as Bill Smith was feeble. Using the conventions in the article:
Twins- Terry Ryan (+8.4:$2.5M) vs (+3.0:$3.3M)

Twins- Bill Smith (+2.9:$2.8M) vs (+10.6:$3.0M)

At least the right guy is back in the saddle.
@Eddie Bajek – Each trade produces its own trWARP exchanges. For example, Jack Zduriencik acquired Brandon League and his +0.1 cumulative WARP (’10-’12) from TOR in Dec. ‘09, and then traded his +0.5 WARP to LAD in Jul. ’12.
@Sean – No doubt Cashman’s case exerts leverage, but removing it does not affect the significance of the fit.
@Paul Clarke – Bavasi was my original motivation in doing this. I wanted to know how bad he was in absolute and relative terms.

Aug 01, 2013 12:07 PM
rating: 0

@jdubus - Bautista's passing through waivers was not captured in the Retrosheet transaction data, so it appeard to me as a simple trade.

Aug 01, 2013 12:11 PM
rating: 0
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article The Prospectus Hit Lis... (07/31)
<< Previous Column
Baseball ProGUESTus: T... (07/24)
Next Column >>
Baseball ProGUESTus: T... (08/06)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: ... (07/31)

Rubbing Mud: A Solution Does Not Exist
The BP Wayback Machine: Who Will Be MLB’s ...
Fantasy Article TTO Scoresheet Podcast: Talking Keepers and ...
Fantasy Article Player Profile: Neftali Feliz
Fantasy Article Fantasy Players to Avoid: Relief Pitchers
Premium Article Raising Aces: Under the Gun 3.0
Premium Article Some Projection Left: The Severino Enigma

The Great Trade Game
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: The A's Add Callaspo
Premium Article The Prospectus Hit List: Wednesday, July 31
Premium Article What You Need to Know: The First-Place Pirat...
Fantasy Article Sporer Report: The July 31 Hail-Mary Team
Transaction Analysis: The Indians Play Scrab...
Premium Article Daily Roundup: Around the League: July 31, 2...

2013-07-31 - Baseball ProGUESTus: Trade WARP: Evaluating ...

2013-08-20 - Baseball ProGUESTus: Giving Up the PED Guess...
2013-08-13 - Baseball ProGUESTus: The Neuroanatomy of Hit...
2013-08-06 - Baseball ProGUESTus: The Foundation of the F...
2013-07-31 - Baseball ProGUESTus: Trade WARP: Evaluating ...
2013-07-24 - Baseball ProGUESTus: The Living Strike Zone
2013-07-16 - Baseball ProGUESTus: The Secret History of S...
2013-07-09 - Baseball ProGUESTus: How the Twins Can Fulfi...

2013-12-03 - Premium Article Transaction Analysis: Dombrowski's Puzzling ...
2013-07-31 - Premium Article Transaction Analysis: Breaking Down the Thre...