CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Click here to log in

Click here for forgotten password

Click here to subscribe

The First-ever Baseball Prospectus Futures Guide - now just $6.86 at Amazon ( bbp.cx/fg )

<< Previous Article

Rumor Roundup: Friday,... (12/14)

<< Previous Column

Transaction Analysis: ... (12/12)

Next Column >>

Transaction Analysis: ... (12/17)

Next Article >>

Raising Aces: The Good... (12/14)

Printer-friendly

December 14, 2012

Transaction Analysis

Josh Hamilton and the End of Analysis

ANAHEIM ANGELS
Team Audit | Player Cards | Depth Chart

Reportedly agree to a contract with OF-L Josh Hamilton for five years and $125 million, pending a physical. [12/13]

The first time I saw Mike Trout was in Rancho Cucamonga, when he was playing his first few games in High-A. His reactions on fly balls seemed a touch slow, maybe because it was a new park for him or maybe because he was 18. A scout I talked to brushed it aside: “He has the speed to outrun his mistakes.”

That’s what money buys a team: the ability to outrun mistakes. Gary Matthews, Jr.? Junk him, get Torii Hunter. Scott Kazmir tanks? Pfft, Matthews’ contract will be up soon, they can spend that money on Dan Haren. Spent all that money on Vernon Wells? Kazmir’s deal is over, and Torii Hunter’s contract will expire soon, so they can just use that money to get Albert Pujols and C.J. Wilson. Those moves are both back-loaded and will restrict the Angels going forward, except that Wells’ deal expires before you know it. There’s always a bad contract or two on the books, but they’re always just a few years away from expiring. There’s always room to risk another mistake.

The rest of this article is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.
Not a subscriber?
Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get access to the best baseball content on the web.

Cancel anytime.

That's a 33% savings over the monthly price!

That's a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

39 comments have been left for this article.

BP Comment Quick Links

code of conduct

djardine

Short term thinking at the extreme, but if they win a World Series or two over the next three years, I am guessing that most A's fans will take the two or three years of abject humiliation that will almost certainly follow.

Dec 13, 2012 15:09 PM

rating: 0

myshkin

I'm sure you meant to echo Jason Wojciechowski's earlier tweets on the subject. This A's fan will happily take one Hamilton-signing-induced Oakland World Series win. Abject humiliation is probably nearby anyway.

Dec 13, 2012 15:43 PM

rating: 2

Jason Wojciechowski

BP staff

Bless you.

Dec 13, 2012 22:31 PM

BarryR

"It's not my money"

I live in Los Angeles, so it IS my money. My cable TV bill is going up steadily as the rights for sports telecasts goes through the roof. I resent the hell out of it. At least I'm a baseball fan, so I watch these overpriced networks. For non-sports fans, cable pricing is a flat-out ripoff. At some point Congress will get involved, forcing some form of a la carte pricing - which will take more of my money.

End of rant.

Dec 13, 2012 15:27 PM

rating: 6

Richard Bergstrom

I agree with you. My cable bill goes up because of all those darned Laker games.

Dec 13, 2012 16:40 PM

rating: -1

Robotey

Congress? Will do something about a la carte pricing? We are more likely to see the A's win the Series than to see Congress, which can agree on less than nothing, assert itself over the country's dominant monopoly-protected media infrastructure.

Dec 13, 2012 19:43 PM

rating: 3

BarryR

First, this is a great opportunity for grandstanding, and both parties love to do that. They can get the least popular entities in America - cable companies - testifying about their rates.
And don't assume that the cable and satellite companies are opposed to this. The negotiations between TWC and Dish and Direct TV over the Time Warner Sports channel wasn't pleasant. You can bet that they would all like a situation where the assorted sports networks are negotiated on their own, without the rest of the conglomerate programming held hostage. They would love to put sports programming on separate tiers -- all of it.

Dec 14, 2012 12:11 PM

rating: 1

jalee121

Yeah, the republican led congress will be ready to take on the huge cable corporations for the small consumer.

But you're right, cable is a ripoff. The only reason I still subscribe it to watch the White Sox.

Dec 14, 2012 08:46 AM

rating: -1

apbadogs

-1 for not being able to stop the uncontrollable urge to add political commentary.

Dec 14, 2012 11:14 AM

rating: 2

Lou Doench

+1 for being right, which is more important than your perception of good taste.

Dec 15, 2012 15:18 PM

rating: -1

Richard Bergstrom

Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway.

+1 just because it's rare to see CNN board-style commentary on here. I'll also give a +1 to anyone that ties WARP to Romney's Five Point Plan.

Dec 14, 2012 13:05 PM

rating: -8

Richard Bergstrom

Trying to wrap my head around this. David Schoenfield said on his ESPN SweetSpot blog that, based on baseball-reference's WAR, Torii Hunter in 2012 was more valuable than Josh Hamilton (5.5 to 3.4 WAR). FanGraphs at 5.3 to 4.4. BP has the WARP at 3.9 for Hamilton vs 3.3 for Hunter. What am I missing here?

Dec 13, 2012 17:39 PM

rating: -1

SamMiller

BP staff

About a 15-run disagreement about Hunter's defense

Dec 13, 2012 17:51 PM

angelsox

Tori Hunter is 37 years old, and last year was the best of his career WAR wise, mostly due to defense. And I'm sure having Trout/Bourjos in center helped. But I agree, it's not a huge upgrade, although there might be some marginal benefit in adding left handed power to the middle of the order.

Dec 13, 2012 17:54 PM

rating: 0

Dodger300

If Hamilton remains healthy, it is a huge upgrade.

The fact that WAR calculations are all over the place shows how much more work needs to be done before it is both proven valid and reliable.

In the meantime, the chance that a 37 year old will repeat the best season of his career are far less than that a 31 year old will. Conparing the two is not even close.

Dec 14, 2012 06:28 AM

rating: 0

Richard Bergstrom

With WAR calculations all over the place, is there a real reason to be upset that Trout didn't win the MVP?

Dec 14, 2012 10:09 AM

rating: -3

vlock1

Not really. The MVP's kind of silly, anyway.

Dec 14, 2012 15:01 PM

rating: 0

SaxonB

Pretty sure that argument had more to it than just WAR.

Dec 14, 2012 21:40 PM

rating: 0

Richard Bergstrom

Such as...?

Dec 15, 2012 07:33 AM

rating: -1

BurrRutledge

Off the top of my head:

Defense, Baserunning, OBP, OPS+.

Dec 15, 2012 08:33 AM

rating: 1

Richard Bergstrom

As I recall, most of the argument was based on Trout's WAR vs Cabrera's Triple Crown on a playoff team.

Defense and the various components of OBP and OPS such as hits, walks, home runs etc are in WAR and WARP. I think the only thing not in there is baserunning. That's why I say "such as?" since WAR/WARP are already including the offensive and defensive components.

Dec 15, 2012 12:52 PM

rating: 1

gweedoh565

Let's get some easily-lookupable-facts straight:

(a) WAR calculations may differ, but all of them showed Trout as clearly way more valuable than Cabrera:

fWAR: Trout=10.0, Cabrera=7.1
rWAR: Trout=10.7, Cabrera=6.9
WARP: Trout=9.1, Cabrera=6.1

(b) All WAR(P) metrics include defense, OBP, AND baserunning per: http://www.baseball-reference.com/about/war_explained_comparison.shtml

(c) Another common non-WR-related argument was that Cabrera out-"clutched" Trout (big September stats), but there was a nice piece of analysis at FanGraphs that dispelled that: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trout-versus-cabrera-offense-only-context-included/

(d) Given all this, Cabrera won seemingly due to three primary factors: he voluntarily moved to 3B, his team made the playoffs, he own the Triple Crown.

Dec 15, 2012 17:34 PM

rating: 3

Richard Bergstrom

Thanks for the breakdown.

Dec 16, 2012 12:27 PM

rating: 0

BurrRutledge

Leet me get this straight, your asking what the case for his MVP would be if you don't count the individual stats that are actually indicative of performance?

Setting aside the absurdity of that premise... did you hear the narrative about how the rookie was called up and sparked the teams turnaround? And how his team won more games in a tougher division than Cabrera's?

Dec 15, 2012 17:48 PM

rating: 1

Richard Bergstrom

Actually, I was asking what factors there were for Trout to win besides WAR(P). You were the one who listed defense, baserunning, etc which were already included inside of WAR(P).

And btw I do think Trout was the MVP, just asking a rhetorical question about why people should use WAR/WARP as a rationale for MVP voting if the metrics disagree or have a wide variance, especially on some players like Torii Hunter.

Dec 16, 2012 12:26 PM

rating: -1

DetroitDale

In addition to the difference between Hunter and Hamilton, you need to consider the WAR this takes away from their nearest competitor. The CJ Wilson deal had a similar benefit, but the Hamilton deal is bigger because it comes on the heals of Texas losing out on Greinke and Upton, the two things that might have caused them to let Hamilton go, and the traded Mike Young and let Mike Napoli go, two things that they probably wouldn't have done had they known Hamilton wouldn't be there at the end of their "maybe we'll keep you maybe we won't" tour of other options.

Texas will be fine but the Angels have but some distance between them. I'm not confident in the Tigers getting past either team now, even with their "new" signing.

Dec 14, 2012 07:53 AM

rating: 0

kjgilber

I think they would have traded Young either way. He is barely playable at all at this stage.

Dec 14, 2012 12:20 PM

rating: 0

ScottyB

On Clubhouse Confidential, Vince Gennaro reported on a study that showed that Josh hamilton has the biggest split between his numbers against the bottom 1/3 pitchers in the league (who he demolishes like a BarryBondsBabeRuth two-headed monster) and his numbers against the top 1/3 pitchers (against whom he is less than league average against.

Enjoy the next 3 years. The 2018 Angels will be brutal.

Dec 13, 2012 18:01 PM

rating: 3

Dodger300

Is that supposed to imply some detrimental effect on the outcome of a season? If so, please provide some empirical evidence that shows it.

Every win counts equally, no matter who it was against.

Dec 14, 2012 06:31 AM

rating: 0

lmarighi

In terms of the regular season, you are absolutely right.
In terms of the postseason, this could make a difference, assuming that it is an actual effect, and not just random variation.

Dec 14, 2012 10:06 AM

rating: 1

ScottyB

What I take away from this is if he has any decline in bat speed, his performance should drop precipitously. Also, Hamilton's value is largely based on his slg. He is now moving from the #5 ballpark for Lhasa power to the 22nd.

Dec 15, 2012 18:19 PM

rating: 0

champaigncaviar

Is there an added value for spiting you division rival?

Dec 14, 2012 01:24 AM

rating: 0

DetroitDale

probably not, but there's added value in removing a prime performer from your closest competitor for the division, because the WAR your adding is also being subtracted from the other competitor

Dec 16, 2012 14:19 PM

rating: 0

apbadogs

Angel fans, settle down. You are about to witness 2 players go over the talent cliff while on the hook for $300M or so. There are no World Series trophies in the future based on this signing.

Dec 14, 2012 04:55 AM

rating: 0

Richard Bergstrom

Hey, at least the Angels are trying to win unlike some teams...

Dec 14, 2012 10:10 AM

rating: 0

apbadogs

Maybe so, but I don't believe it's money wisely spent.

Dec 14, 2012 11:18 AM

rating: 0

conwell

The interesting thing is that at least on an annual average value basis, the Angels payroll going into 2013 is roughly flat from 2012. They shed the salaries they were paying Hunter, Abreu, Greinke, Haren, Santana, Izturis and Hawkins while adding the costs of Hamilton, Blanton, Madson and Burnett.

Dec 14, 2012 09:19 AM

rating: 2

T. Kiefer

To all Angels (and Dodgers) fans: You have every right to be excited, but here's something to help you get out of your dream-state:
2008 Tigers
Chant that, and you'll remain grounded.

Dec 14, 2012 12:28 PM

rating: 0

Lou Doench

Here's what I wonder. Say this deal breaks just right and the Angels win 102 games. That just gets them in the playoffs, where they get to square off witth lesser teams iin incredibly unpredictable 5 and 7 game series.

The Giants have won 2 titles in the last 3 years with a lineup that Sabean seems to recruit from the island of misfit toys each year. It is harder than ever to buy a championship, because we have so devalued regular season wins.

Dec 15, 2012 15:30 PM

rating: 2

Sorry, fantasy subscribers cannot comment on exclusive premium content.

<< Previous Article

Rumor Roundup: Friday,... (12/14)

<< Previous Column

Transaction Analysis: ... (12/12)

Next Column >>

Transaction Analysis: ... (12/17)

Next Article >>

Raising Aces: The Good... (12/14)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS Fantasy Freestyle: Travis Wood and the Winds... Daily Hit List: Wednesday, May 22 Scouting the Draft: Center Fielders to Know Skewed Left: A Somewhat Happy 40th for the I... The Lineup Card: 7 Baseball Firsts We Expect... What You Need to Know: The No-Name O's Raising Aces: This Justin	MORE FROM DECEMBER 14, 2012 Raising Aces: The Good Old Days: Greg Maddux Rumor Roundup: Friday, December 14 Prospect Push: Personal Favorites: Roberto O... Fantasy Beat: Jeremy Hellickson and Defying ... The Keeper Reaper: Outfielders for 12/14/12 Overthinking It: The Prospects Who Get Trade... The BP Wayback Machine: When Good GMs Go Bad
MORE BY SAM MILLER 2012-12-19 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 1... 2012-12-18 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 1... 2012-12-17 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 1... 2012-12-14 - Transaction Analysis: Josh Hamilton and the ... 2012-12-14 - BP Unfiltered: Which WAR(P) Are You? 2012-12-14 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 1... 2012-12-13 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 1... More...	MORE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS 2012-12-17 - Transaction Analysis: The Mets Deal Dickey t... 2012-12-17 - Transaction Analysis: Putting the 'Pen In Pe... 2012-12-17 - Transaction Analysis: A Number 3, Anibal Sty... 2012-12-14 - Transaction Analysis: Josh Hamilton and the ... 2012-12-12 - Transaction Analysis: The Diamondbacks Deal ... 2012-12-12 - Transaction Analysis: Twins Find Their Ident... 2012-12-10 - Transaction Analysis: The Shields/Myers Bloc... More...