BP Comment Quick Links
![]() |
|
|
The First-ever Baseball Prospectus Futures Guide - now just $6.89 at Amazon ( bbp.cx/fg ) |
|
|
October 15, 2012 Baseball TherapyThe Case for CanoDepending on the day, Robinson Cano is often the third- or fourth-most-talked-about member of the Yankee infield.
But what about the second baseman on the team, Robinson Cano? (Yes, the same one who’s 0-for-his-last 26 in October.) He might be the least famous member of his own infield, but he might just be the second most valuable position player in the 2012 American League. And no, this is not a torch piece on Miguel Cabrera. Friends, Romans, Countrymen, I come here not to bury Miguel Cabrera, but to praise him. Mr. Cabrera was, in my estimation, a close third in the AL Most Valuable Position Player race, and that's not a bad thing to be. My father is fond of saying, "close only counts in horseshoes and atomic weapons," but Cabrera had a really good year, and his parents should be proud of him. It's just that there were a couple of guys who had a better year than he did. There's no shame in that. Instead, I'd rather ask a simple question: What does Robinson Cano have to do to escape the Chase Utley Zone and get some recognition? Cano finished 2012 second in the American League in WARP here at BP and in the analogous value over replacement standings at several other sites. While debates about Mike Trout and Cabrera have spawned a multitude of columns and blog posts and tweets and water-cooler conversations (including the discussion I got into with a guy from Michigan), it's as if the Yankee second-sacker has been invisible in the conversation. Maybe Cano needs to go to a larger market where he would get on national TV more often. I think that the blind spot for Cano's value comes from the fact that he produces value in hidden ways. For one, Cano hit "only" 33 home runs to Cabrera's 44, although Cano hit 48 doubles (and a triple) to Cabrera's 40 doubles. There's a crown for the guy who hits the most home runs, and you know who won it. Without cheating, can you tell me who led each league in doubles this year (answer at the bottom)? It's certainly true that a home run is worth more than a double, although the difference is not as great as one might think, and certainly not in line with the recognition that each hit type receives from the baseball media. Cano also plays an above-average second base and saved some runs defensively. As a general rule of thumb, it's a lot harder to fill up-the-middle positions than corner positions. While Cano's raw counting numbers are a little below “OMG” level, he puts them up while playing a non-embarrassing second base. If there's something that we've learned about baseball over the past 25 years, it's that position matters. The average waiver wire/Triple-A/bench guy who plays second base will put up a lot less value than a similar journeyman who plays on the corners. When it's all summed up, Cano ends up having a value slightly above that of Miguel Cabrera.
|
But shouldn't Miggy get some points for what he contributed during the final month or two, with playoff berths hanging in the balance for all 3 teams?
Miggy had a 1.040 OPS in September/October and 1.092 in August. Cano went .870 and .862, and Trout went .850 and .866 during the final two months (60 games).
Maybe sabrematicians won't allow for this consideration, but I'm sure Tigers fans sure can appreciate what Miggy did down the stretch.
Sure, go ahead and discount his Triple Crown, but don't overlook Miggy's far superior contributions at crunch time.
Cano's September/October OPS was .999. Below that of Cabrera to be sure, but not Neifi Perez-esque either. I wonder what their defensive and baserunning contributions were during those months.
I'm personally willing to entertain the hypothesis that performance in crunch time is harder (and more valuable?). But, I'd also suggest that we need to be careful of recency bias. Part of the reason that September is so salient to the minds of voters (whether official or not) is that it takes place right before the voting and is easier to remember than May. Then there's the flip side of the "crunch time" argument: had one of these guys gone nuts in May, his team could have stored up wins, clinched earlier and coasted through September. It makes for a less interesting story, but an equally effective way to win a division.
Interesting look at the "crunch time" argument. Thanks.
Most Tiger fans do appreciate what they he did down the stretch. However, games still all count for one no matter how big they "feel".
Why do the last games of the year mean more than the second game of the season?