CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Fantasy Article Resident Fantasy Geniu... (10/01)
<< Previous Column
Baseball Therapy: A Sa... (09/28)
Next Column >>
Baseball Therapy: WARP... (10/02)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The Up... (10/01)

October 1, 2012

Baseball Therapy

When Do Players Stop Developing?

by Russell A. Carleton

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

"He just needs another year."

If you cheer for a team that didn't quite perform up to expectations this year (and even if you cheer for a team headed to the playoffs), you've got a guy or two like this on your team. He has so much promise; it's just that he hasn't quite fulfilled it. You rationalize it by saying that he's young—well, young-ish. He just needs time.

Every year, there are a handful of guys who take that big step into stardom that we'd all assumed they would for years. After a few seasons of growing pains, Alex Gordon quietly went from disappointing prospect to a very-good-but-not-great player. It’s the tantalizing prospect of another Alex Gordon that makes some fans (and teams) hold on and hope. And a lot of times, it doesn't happen.

But when should a fan or a team give up hope for further development?

Warning! Gory Mathematical Details Ahead!
One problem with studying player development over time is that baseball presents us with a horribly biased sample. For the most part, we see only the success stories. Players who aren't developing well are often jettisoned, either to the minors or the waiver wire. Some players start with minimal skill but develop to the point where by age 27, they are fringe major leaguers. The problem is that charting their developmental course involves the shady world of "translating" minor-league statistics.

But we will make do. I isolated a group of players who had at least 100 MLB plate appearances in each season from their age 24-season through their age-31 season. I searched between 1993 and 2011, leaving me with a sample of 168 players. This adds another layer of selectivity. We know that players who debut earlier (at age 24, for instance) tend to peak a little later than their peers. This is in addition to the fact that these players were apparently developing well enough to keep a steady job over the years.

I calculated a bunch of basic stats for each player season (K/PA, BB/PA, HR/PA, OBP). Nothing incredibly inventive here. For each stat, I ran correlations from year-to-year. In other words, I ran a correlation between the age-24 seasons in the data set with the age-25 season, age 25 with 26, age 26 with 27, and so on.

There weren't any surprises in terms of stats that we once thought to be reliable suddenly becoming unreliable. What surprised me was the pattern that formed. Here are the year-to-year coefficients for OBP. Everything else that I ran had the same basic pattern.

Ages

Correlation

24-25

.591

25-26

.594

26-27

.647

27-28

.660

28-29

.670

29-30

.586

30-31

.579

Notice that jump from the 25-26 correlation to 26-27? And then the drop in correlation from 28-29 to 29-30. That appeared everywhere. If you have a bad (or good) year at age 24 or 25, there's a better chance that your next season will be different than there is at age 26. At that point, things become a little more set in stone. At 29, it looks like things get a little more unstable again. My guess is that some guys start to drop off at 30, while others hold their value.

It's a simple finding, but I think it has some interesting implications for the issue of peak age. We know that certain types of players peak later and last longer based on when they debut, but I think these analyses point to a slightly different interpretation of the question. Aside from the "everyone's different and some guys are just late bloomers" argument, I think we need a slightly different conceptualization of peak age. I'd argue that instead of expecting a nice steady improvement to age 27 or so, we need to think more about a critical period of development.

To use a real-world (because baseball is a fake world) example, it is widely known that children are much quicker to learn a foreign language than are adults. For example, my wife came to the United States when she was 10. She speaks better English than I do. Her parents speak English just fine, but there are times when they have to stop and talk over a phrase in their native Russian. Developmentally, it seems that the cutoff age is about 12. Before 12, you're more likely to be able to pick up the skill. After 12, not so much.

It looks like a critical period for player development ends around 26. So, if your favorite player hasn't figured it out by then, chances are that he won't.

Russell A. Carleton is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Russell's other articles. You can contact Russell by clicking here

Related Content:  Aging,  Development,  Peak Age,  Aging Curve,  Player Aging

9 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

piraino
Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway.

Really? You guys haven't figured this out yet? Don't your PECOTA projections use age?

Oct 01, 2012 06:14 AM
rating: -9
 
IvanGrushenko

Any findings relating to the hypothesis that RH power batters develop later than LH batters or RH non-power batters?

Oct 01, 2012 06:33 AM
rating: 1
 
apbadogs

I read the headline and thought..."Brandon Moss".

Oct 01, 2012 07:11 AM
rating: 2
 
MGL

This is an interesting way to look at the development curve (correlations from one age to the next). I like it.

At the same time, don't these results mimic the standard aging curve, whereby there is a steep upward curve to around age 26, then a plateau (with a slight downward slope) until age 29 and then a fairly steep downward curve?

If we assume that every player has a similar curve only it shifts right or left, then we would expect the same correlations that you get.

Oct 01, 2012 11:00 AM
rating: 1
 
BP staff member Russell A. Carleton
BP staff

The standard cutoff points seem to fit, but I think interpreting it as a validation of the standard peak model falls short. The last sentence that you write is the one that gives me the most trouble.

A nice, smooth, uniform, upward curve/line would have a high correlation coefficient running through it year-to-year. Straight lines have a correlation of 1.0, after all. These numbers tell me that we need to view 24-26 as more of a chaotic, malleable period. Some will take bigger jumps than others. Some will fall. At 26 though, the chaos stablizes. At 29, some start to decline, while others hold.

I think that we need to get away from the assumption that everyone follows the same curve (up, plateau, down) and embrace player development for the much more chaotic process that it is.

Oct 01, 2012 11:42 AM
 
Pat Folz

It's interesting that you mention Alex Gordon as a breakout player, since his 2012 hitting is almost identical to his 2008. The difference in WARP value is almost entirely in defense. Between those years of course he had two fairly horrible, injury-plagued years, and one excellent one, and those color the perceptions. We don't usually think about it like this, but the weaker correlations for young players could go both ways -- does that mean that large declines in performance (injury-related or otherwise) are more likely for younger players than those at their peaks?

Also, did you try looking at the correlations by year of experience instead of age? I'd guess that there's a similar shape since age+experience overlap to an extent, but differences might be enlightening, especially for players way ahead of or behind the curve.

(If it wasn't obvious, I'm thinking about Justin Upton as I make these inquiries. And at all times in general)

Oct 01, 2012 12:37 PM
rating: 0
 
Pat Folz

Of course I write that then refresh and see your reply to MGL, so I guess that addresses my first question!

Oct 01, 2012 12:46 PM
rating: 0
 
wilsonc

I'd be curious to see how the players' ages and methods of entering pro-ball impact the chart, if at all. If it's indeed a particular age range where a player's most malleable, I wouldn't expect a huge difference between groupings, whereas if it's more a product of a point on a learning curve based on training, I'd expect there to be a more noticeable difference, for example, between players signed as 20+ year-olds out of college and 16 year-olds signed out of Latin America.

Oct 01, 2012 19:46 PM
rating: 1
 
John Carter

Dr. Carleton: I don’t quite see how your 2010 write-up shows that players who debut early "peak a little later". It did show that among players who are still in the Majors after age 31 – the earlier starters of that group tend to have later peaks. However, among those who bow out of the Majors before then – the earlier debuts tended to peak earlier. Don’t those two groups pretty well flatten the aggregate findings among all players?

Oct 02, 2012 10:25 AM
rating: 0
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Fantasy Article Resident Fantasy Geniu... (10/01)
<< Previous Column
Baseball Therapy: A Sa... (09/28)
Next Column >>
Baseball Therapy: WARP... (10/02)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The Up... (10/01)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Premium Article League Preview Series
Every Team's Moneyball: Minnesota Twins: Reb...
Premium Article Skewed Left: History Repeats Itself
Premium Article League Preview Series
Premium Article Pitching Backward: Why Relievers Get A Free ...
Premium Article Spring Training Notebook: Cactus League
Prospectus Feature: How the Astros do Spring...

MORE FROM OCTOBER 1, 2012
Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The Uplifting, Inspirational...
Fantasy Article Resident Fantasy Genius: The 2012 Fantasy Fa...
The Week in Quotes: September 24-30
Premium Article Collateral Damage Daily: Monday, October 1
Premium Article The Prospectus Hit List: Monday, October 1
What You Need to Know: Monday, October 1
Fantasy Article Value Picks: Relievers Review

MORE BY RUSSELL A. CARLETON
2012-10-15 - Premium Article Baseball Therapy: The Case for Cano
2012-10-11 - Premium Article Baseball Therapy: Is Joe Saunders a Double P...
2012-10-02 - Baseball Therapy: WARP for People Who Didn't...
2012-10-01 - Premium Article Baseball Therapy: When Do Players Stop Devel...
2012-09-28 - Baseball Therapy: A Sabermetric Case for Mig...
2012-09-24 - Baseball Therapy: Reading Lolita in Teheran,...
2012-09-21 - Baseball Therapy: Wild-Card Game Theory
More...

MORE BASEBALL THERAPY
2012-10-15 - Premium Article Baseball Therapy: The Case for Cano
2012-10-11 - Premium Article Baseball Therapy: Is Joe Saunders a Double P...
2012-10-02 - Baseball Therapy: WARP for People Who Didn't...
2012-10-01 - Premium Article Baseball Therapy: When Do Players Stop Devel...
2012-09-28 - Baseball Therapy: A Sabermetric Case for Mig...
2012-09-24 - Baseball Therapy: Reading Lolita in Teheran,...
2012-09-21 - Baseball Therapy: Wild-Card Game Theory
More...

INCOMING ARTICLE LINKS
2013-11-11 - Premium Article Baseball Therapy: The Cost of a Cost-Control...