<< Previous Article
Western Front: Portrai... (09/25)
|
<< Previous Column
Overthinking It: No Ac... (09/20)
|
Next Column >>
Overthinking It: The I... (09/27)
|
Next Article >>
Painting the Black: Wh... (09/25)
|
September 25, 2012
Overthinking It
The 2012 All-Fringe-Prospect Team
by Ben Lindbergh
It used to be that BP based its prospect lists largely on statistical performance. Sometimes this approach served us well, when the numbers picked up on something scouts overlooked. Other times—probably most times—we were the ones missing out. Never were the advantages and disadvantages of the stathead approach to prospect rankings made more clear than on our 2005 Top-50 list, when we placed Dustin Pedroia and Mitch Einertson in a 49th-place tie. Baseball America didn’t put Pedroia in its top 100 that year, and he went on to win an MVP award, so score one for us. Baseball America never put Einertson in its top 100, and he followed up the small-sample .303/.406/.688 2004 season that got us all excited by not making the majors, so score one for the scouts. So far, anyway. Einertson is only 26 and still playing in the American Association, so there’s still hope.
These days, of course, we take both stats and scouting into account. While we still make mistakes, we have a better process in place. However, that process can be disappointing. Sometimes, our inner numbers nerds start dreaming on a stat line, only to have our hopes crushed when we find out our new favorite prospect is a poseur who won’t be able to miss bats at the major-league level or hit a big-league breaking ball. This article is a position-by-position tribute to the fringy prospects who wouldn’t be able to back up the eye-catching stats on the back of their baseball cards, if they were good enough to have baseball cards.
A few ground rules:
- The player has to have played in a full-season league (Class A and above). Short-season stats are strange.
- The player has to be under 30. I don’t have to tell you that a 30-year-old minor leaguer is either A) on a rehab assignment or B) not a prospect. Sure, 34-year-old Mike Hessman hit a career-high 35 homers, bringing his minor-league total to 370, but no one would confuse him with a prospect at this point.
- The player has to be rookie eligible. For the most part, anyone whose rookie eligibility is up has already had his chance and blown it. Nobody cares what Jeff Clement hit in Indianapolis this season, except for Bill Bavasi, who’s still hoping that third-overall pick pans out.
Most of these players have already spent some time in the majors or will make the majors eventually, which means they’re more talented than the vast majority of minor leaguers. But contrary to what their 2012 stats might suggest, they likely won’t last long or amount to much.
Catcher
Tim Federowicz, Dodgers
What he did: Federowicz, who went to the Dodgers with Stephen Fife in the Trayvon Robinson trade at the 2011 deadline, hit .294/.371/.461 in 475 plate appearances for Triple-A Albuquerque. He threw out 39 percent of attempted basestealers. He earned a call-up to Los Angeles at the start of September and has received a whopping one plate appearance since. Apparently there’s a pennant race on.
Why what he did doesn’t matter: The first prospect on the list might be the best one—as a former seventh-round pick, he’s practically a blue-chipper compared to some of the players to come. It’s hard to find a catcher who can hit at all and doesn’t have at least a little promise, so we’ll have to settle for a slightly superior player here. However, while Federowicz might be a big leaguer, he’s not nearly as good as his superficial stats. Catchers take time to develop, but at 25, he’s not ahead of the curve. More disturbingly, his numbers were dramatically inflated by the offensive environment at Albuquerque. On the road, Federowicz hit .245/.331/.370. He also did most of his damage against lefties, though he hadn’t shown as severe a platoon split in previous seasons. Federowicz’s raw stats might suggest a starter, but he profiles best as a part-timer who gets some starts against southpaws.
First Base
Darin Ruf, Phillies
What he did: You’ve probably already read about Ruf, the first baseman for Double-A Reading who led the minor leagues with 38 home runs. Ruf hit .317/.408/.620 in 584 plate appearances, striking out a respectable 102 times. The right-handed Ruf murdered opposite-handed pitching, slugging .845 against southpaws before getting a cup of coffee with the big club in September.
Why what he did doesn’t matter: The former 20th-round pick turned 26 years old this season, which he started with only 25 career home runs. His position is listed as “Pinch Hitter” at Baseball-Reference, and there’s a good reason for that: he’s barely passable defensively either at first or the outfield corners. His relative weakness against righties and tendency to go after bad balls should make him an easy target in the majors. That the Phillies have given Ruf only three plate appearances after the minor-league season he had tells you most of what you need to know. That the minor-league home run leaders in three of the past four seasons were Bryan LaHair, Jon Gaston, and Dallas McPherson, respectively, tells you the rest.
<< Previous Article
Western Front: Portrai... (09/25)
|
<< Previous Column
Overthinking It: No Ac... (09/20)
|
Next Column >>
Overthinking It: The I... (09/27)
|
Next Article >>
Painting the Black: Wh... (09/25)
|
I think it is badly mistaken to consider the fact that a player was drafted in the XXth round, where XX is a number much greater than 1, as an indication that "what he did doesn't matter." Scouts miss guys, or misjudge what they see, sometimes. One need look no further than the 402nd selection in the 1999 draft for evidence of that. (We all know what that was, don't we?) Draftees as late as the 48th round (Angels catcher Bobby Wilson) are currently playing in the Show, and quite a few guys from the lower rounds are actually proving useful to their teams. St. Louis currently has no fewer than seven guys (Jason Motte, Jaime Garcia, Adron Chambers, Tony Cruz, Sam Freeman, Trevor Rosenthal, Matt Carpenter) on their roster who were drafted in the 10th round or later, and all of those no-chance guys sure aren't hurting their playoff aspirations any. Turning up one's nose at a prospect just because he was drafted in a late round seems rather silly to me. (Or did you intend that sarcastically? If so, it doesn't come across in the writing.)
I didn't put anyone on the list because of his draft round--they're all on there because of their abilities. But I definitely don't think it's a mistake to consider draft round. It's a data point. Nate used to include draft round as a PECOTA input, because it tells us something. Sure, there are exceptions, and scouts miss sometimes, but on the whole, not a lot of pitchers with great stuff fall to the 35th round. Piazza is the outlier to end all outliers, so I'm not sure how helpful citing him is. And some of the other guys you cite are about as fringy as major leaguers come, so I don't think they really disprove the idea that draft round can be instructive. I'm turning up my nose at these particular prospects because of what they've done since getting drafted, but I don't think it's unreasonable to say that their draft position was a warning.
And Jason Motte is a convert. He was a catcher before moving to pitching so that speaks more to the Cardinals ability to develop a player irrespective of draft position. I think most teams (all else equal including perceived ability at each) would attempt to make a prospect a position player rather than a pitcher.
RE: but on the whole, not a lot of pitchers with great stuff fall to the 35th round
It looks like one fell to the 48th round in C.J. Edwards.
Actually, there is a 50th rounder playing in the majors right now: Jarrod Dyson.