BP Comment Quick Links
![]() |
|
|
The First-ever Baseball Prospectus Futures Guide - now just $7.00 at Amazon ( bbp.cx/fg ) |
|
|
August 1, 2012 Transaction AnalysisTrade Deadline Non-Transaction Analysis
We’ve been inundating you with transaction analysis for the past several days—which makes sense, as transactions have been the biggest generator of excitement over that stretch of time. But now that the trade deadline is over, we have a convenient opportunity to analyze the deals that didn’t happen. Our general criteria for inclusion:
One more thing before we proceed: this is all based on rumors and speculation. We don’t know for sure which players were really up on the block, except for the ones actually traded. And we don’t know what players were offered in return. We’re not trying to second-guess the general managers involved, but to construct a plausible explanation (or explanations) as to why these players didn’t move at the deadline, given what we believe we know from media reporting. Alright, let’s proceed!
|
Moving Soriano wasn't a big deal for the Cubs, right now. He's having a great year (he really is, if he wasn't getting paid so much then people would really notice it) and he provides something that you can't put a pricetag on. He's providing protection in the lineup for Anthony Rizzo. Without Soriano behind Rizzo, right now, teams could pitch around Rizzo and his numbers would drop. With Soriano in the lineup teams have to pitch to Rizzo because Soriano can make them pay. Is he a MVP canidate? Not even close.. but he's still valuable to the Cubs this year..