CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Extra Innings Excerpt (03/16)
<< Previous Column
Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: The Clos... (03/14)
Next Column >>
Fantasy Beat: Tout War... (03/27)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Out of Left Field: On ... (03/19)

March 19, 2012

Fantasy Beat

The Impact of BABIP, LOB%, and Luck

by Jason Collette

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

Last season, one of my favorite baseball reads that became useful fantasy knowledge was this piece by Rich Lederer at Baseball Analysts.  What he laid out is something that I’ve recommended and used in previous years as a quick and dirty way to look for potential targets at the end of drafts. If you believe in simple regression to the mean, it makes sense to target pitchers that were well below their personal and/or league average, since logic dictates they should do better the following season. As Lederer put it:

While strikeouts, walks, and home runs play a large part in determining ERA, the latter is also a function of defensive and bullpen support, as well as performance with bases empty vs. runners in scoring position. As a result, the difference between ERA and FIP is almost entirely accounted by strand rate (LOB%*) and batting average on balls in play (BABIP). Each variable has a coefficient correlation of nearly 80 percent with the delta between ERA and FIP.

When you put the two together (LOB% divided by BABIP), the coefficient correlation jumps to 90 percent. Accordingly, the coefficient of determination or R² is 81 percent. In other words, more than four-fifths of the difference between ERA and FIP is due to LOB% and BABIP. As such, in addition to SO, BB, and HR rates, it makes sense to study LOB% and BABIP to understand why a pitcher's ERA may be better or worse than his FIP.

The graph below shows the 138 pitchers who threw at least 100 innings last season. The red lines represent the league averages for BABIP and LOB% while the slanted line is the line of best fit and represents a correlation coefficient of -0.43.

Quadrant I represent the pitchers who had both a BABIP and a LOB% that were better than league average. The table below shows the most extreme members of this group:

PITCHER

2011 BABIP

2011 LOB%

CAREER BABIP

CAREER LOB%

ERA-FIP

Jered Weaver

.252

83%

.276

77%

-0.83

Jeremy Hellickson

.224

82%

.230

82%

-1.52

Justin Verlander

.237

80%

.285

73%

-0.63

Josh Beckett

.249

80%

.290

72%

-0.72

James Shields

.260

80%

.299

73%

-0.63

Ricky Romero

.245

79%

.285

75%

-1.31

Cole Hamels

.259

78%

.280

77%

-0.23

Johnny Cueto

.254

76%

.283

75%

-1.11

Hellickson’s career numbers mean nothing since his career is nearly entirely comprised of 2011 statistics. That said, he and Weaver are very similar in many ways. Both are mainly fastball/changeup pitchers that induce plenty of swings and misses along with bad contact in the form of infield pop-ups.  Largely as a result, Weaver has had a BABIP below the league average for most of his career, and Hellickson has shown a propensity across one season to do that. Hamels is another pitcher who has been able to out-perform the league average several times, and he has been a Quadrant I pitcher for two straight seasons. Also worth noting is that five of the pitchers above also feature one of the best changeups in baseball, which helps them with both swings and misses as well as inducing weak contact.

The ERA-FIP column shows why many seem to be running from Hellickson in drafts this month and why his BABIP has been quite the talking point in recent weeks.  If you regress Hellickson’s BABIP to league average using the 3700 balls in play figure both Tom Tango and our own Derek Carty found to be correct, his BABIP comes out to .282. However, if you regress it to the Rays’ team BABIP of .266, Hellickson’s BABIP would have been .260. There is no doubt that Hellickson’s BABIP will climb in 2012, but looking at numbers like that should help lessen the worry about it climbing all of the way back up to the league average (especially since, as an extreme flyball pitcher who induces pop-ups, his BABIP should be expected to be lower to begin with).

The largest ERA-FIP differences in Quandrant I were:

When pursuing pitchers in Quadrant I, some will come at a discount because people fear regression, but the bigger names often find their way into that quadrant because they are simply that good. Conversely, Quadrant IV present bargains in the form of pitchers coming off rough seasons thanks to worse-than-average BABIP and LOB%. The table below shows the most extreme cases in that area:

PITCHER

2011 BABIP

2011 LOB%

CAREER BABIP

CAREER LOB%

ERA-FIP

John Lackey

.340

64%

.309

72%

1.67

Derek Lowe

.332

66%

.295

70%

1.38

Ricky Nolasco

.337

66%

.309

68%

1.17

Brian Duensing

.334

66%

.301

73%

0.92

Joel Pineiro

.324

66%

.298

70%

0.67

Jo-Jo Reyes

.326

65%

.317

64%

0.63

Jaime Garcia

.326

65%

.302

71%

0.63

In the case of Reyes, he was essentially pitching to his typical (poor) career averages, but the rest of the pitchers were much worse than their career averages. Lackey is out for the 2011 season, so he is out of consideration, but Lowe changing to a better infield defense, Nolasco moving indoors, and Garcia all present intriguing options to pick up at a discount.

Here are the 12 best ERA-FIP totals in Quadrant IV:

Jason Collette is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Jason's other articles. You can contact Jason by clicking here

Related Content:  Brian Duensing,  Babip

13 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

Mike W
(830)

Need to correct "Lackey" in table - it's Peavy.

Good article.

Mar 19, 2012 09:42 AM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Jason Collette
BP staff

They actually had equal ERA-FIP's. Peavy didn't qualify for the table as he didn't have extremes in both BABIP & LOB while I didn't list Lackey below because he's not usable this season.

Mar 19, 2012 09:45 AM
 
pobothecat

Another nice one, Jason.

And it brings to mind the mini-discussion last week from Jay Jaffe's NL rotation-ratings article --- how projected WARP is based largely on pitcher independent outcomes (Fair Run Avg.) and its limitations.

My question: is there a pitcher-rating based on something like FRA that also incorporates these next-level insights into LOB/BABIP, FIP/ERA disparities?

Since I'm guessing not, isn't this a stat calling out to be invented?

Mar 19, 2012 10:53 AM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Jason Collette
BP staff

There is not one, so the call is on the line

Mar 19, 2012 12:04 PM
 
hessshaun

Good old Nolasco and Morrow. Dual Breakout, Season III.

Also, I must have missed this. Do we have any indication how the Miami Aquarium will rank in parkish factors?

Mar 19, 2012 12:00 PM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Jason Collette
BP staff

Same dimensions as the other yard but without the weather factors. I think it will suppress offense a bit myself.

Mar 19, 2012 12:03 PM
 
Doug Thorburn

Great piece, Jason.

I especially liked the reference to change-ups after Table 1, as I believe that some pitchers do have an exceptional ability to induce weak contact, and had noticed that many of the exceptions were pitchers with plus change-ups.

In fact, I was surprised that Matt Cain missed your first list, given that he is the poster boy for low BABIP's and beating his FIP's, and of course his meanest offering is el cambio. Then I saw that his 70.6% LOB was too low for inclusion, so I understand the omission.

I appreciate research that detect trends in the collective data set, but the power of such studies often breaks down when applied to individual cases. I contend that "regression to the mean" is often mis-applied, either in the context of league-wide vs player-specific regression, or in the underlying assumption that a player's "True Value" is static. It is necessary to look deeper at individual player context, as you have well-exemplified in this article!

I have been writing an article series on the subject of True Value over at BDD, so this topic is right in my zone of thought these days. Thanks for adding more thoughtful analysis to the discussion, and for addressing some of the underlying issues "Between the Numbers."




Mar 19, 2012 12:05 PM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Jason Collette
BP staff

Thanks, Doug. I think team context is being overlooked in a lot of these discussions. People tend to focus on park effects while ignoring team defense effects. After watching all of the articles on Hellickson's BABIP over the last month, only onetook a dive into the team defense.

When you regress Hellickson's BABIP against the team defense, a .270 doesn't look as bad as the .290-.310 range everyone assumes will be the case. I'd like to dive more into the FB/CH combo to see how that helps because I go back and look at a guy like Tom Browning who had BABIPs below .280 in six of his eight full seasons.

Mar 20, 2012 06:32 AM
 
CalledStrike3

Jaime Garcia led the league in unearned runs allowed last year - I dont think he handles adversity as well as he should.

Mar 19, 2012 17:45 PM
rating: 0
 
Behemoth

As a groundball heavy pitcher, pitching in front of a ropy infield defence, he's always going to give up quite a few unearned runs.

Mar 20, 2012 05:55 AM
rating: 0
 
jfranco77

"However, if you regress it to the Rays’ team BABIP of .266, Hellickson’s BABIP would have been .260"

Why don't more people do that? Regress Matt Cain and Jered Weaver's HR/FB to their respective teams instead of to the NL average? Seems to make more sense to me to do it that way.

Mar 20, 2012 09:40 AM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Jason Collette
BP staff

Even with Cain, at this point in his career with his balls in play total, what he is doing it a true talent level now and not just a fluke.

Mar 20, 2012 09:44 AM
 
bartelsjason

Own three of those guys. Hope they were just unlucky last year.

Apr 01, 2012 20:27 PM
rating: 0
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Extra Innings Excerpt (03/16)
<< Previous Column
Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: The Clos... (03/14)
Next Column >>
Fantasy Beat: Tout War... (03/27)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Out of Left Field: On ... (03/19)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Fantasy Rounders: The Slump Buster
Premium Article What Scouts Are Saying: July 1, 2015
Premium Article Going Yard: Futures Game: USA Bats
Premium Article Minor League Update: Games of Tuesday, June ...
Premium Article What You Need to Know: July 1, 2015
Premium Article Notes from the Field: July 1, 2015
Premium Article The Call-Up: Miguel Sano

MORE FROM MARCH 19, 2012
Premium Article Prospectus Hit and Run: AL Rotation Rumble
Premium Article Bizball: From Magic to Cohen and More: Handi...
The Process: Remember Matt Dominguez
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: Pettitte Returns
Premium Article Collateral Damage: Bullpen Blowout
Premium Article Out of Left Field: On Baseball Unretirement
The BP First Take: Monday, March 12

MORE BY JASON COLLETTE
2012-04-02 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Comparing CBS, LABR, and Tout ...
2012-03-30 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Comparing CBS, LABR, and Tout ...
2012-03-27 - Fantasy Beat: Tout Wars and LABR AL Drafts
2012-03-19 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: The Impact of BABIP, LOB%, and...
2012-03-14 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: The Closer Matrix
2012-03-09 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: The Case for B.J. Upton
2012-03-05 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: LABR Draft Fallout
More...

MORE FANTASY BEAT
2012-03-30 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: BP Preseason Fantasy Baseball ...
2012-03-30 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Comparing CBS, LABR, and Tout ...
2012-03-27 - Fantasy Beat: Tout Wars and LABR AL Drafts
2012-03-19 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: The Impact of BABIP, LOB%, and...
2012-03-14 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: The Closer Matrix
2012-03-09 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: The Case for B.J. Upton
2012-03-05 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: LABR Draft Fallout
More...

INCOMING ARTICLE LINKS
2012-05-22 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Examining Felipe Paulino