CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article Overthinking It: A Lit... (02/03)
<< Previous Column
Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: The Cons... (02/02)
Next Column >>
Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Dead to ... (02/04)
Next Article >>
Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Shootin... (02/03)

February 3, 2011

Fantasy Beat

Value Picks in the Bullpen

by Mike Petriello

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

This week in the relief pitcher edition of Value Picks, we’re going to get into three situations where the ninth inning duties may be in doubt thanks to either injury or uncertainty. Since Alex Anthopolous seems to be laying low this week, I suppose we’ll have to acknowledge that there are actually other teams in the league besides the Blue Jays, who had served this column so well for content in recent weeks. Foiled again!

As a reminder, I'm always happy to take requests for players or situations that interest you in the comments. Last week, that generated a good discussion about Aroldis Chapman's future in Cincinnati, so please keep them coming.

David Aardsma and Brandon League, Seattle

Our first stop is in the Pacific Northwest, where closer David Aardsma is coming off not only what was seen as a relatively disappointing season, but also late December surgery to repair a torn labrum in his hip. The fact that he didn't go under the knife until nearly three months into the offseason impacted his return date significantly, and late last week Mariners trainer Rick Griffin confirmed that Aardsma won't be ready to pitch in games until at least the second week of the season. Assuming that he'll then need a few weeks for rehab on the farm, he's probably not going to rejoin the big club until at least early May.

In the interim, that means Brandon League, the only Mariner reliever other than Aardsma with a WXRL over 0.434 last year, is likely in line for some early save opportunities. League briefly became a hot name last summer when the Mariners made it clear that Aardsma was on the trading block, only to see his fantasy value plummet when no deal was made. He managed to vulture a few saves while Aardsma was unavailable with minor injuries and family concerns, and his nine wins counted as a fluky plus, but on the whole he had a perfectly unremarkable season. His WXRL ranked 67th in MLB, and the various wins above replacement systems placed him at just slightly above replacement, which makes him a decent but hardly noteworthy reliever. It's not exactly the kind of record that makes the deal to give up Brandon Morrow to acquire him from the Jays look like a great investment. (I knew I could figure out a way to talk about Toronto somehow.)

Yet, look at the other names from last year's Seattle bullpen. Shawn Kelley is recovering from arm surgery. Mark Lowe went to Texas with Cliff Lee. Sean White signed in Colorado. Jamey Wright's back on a minor-league deal, but suffers from the debilitating flaw of being Jamey Wright. In fact, the only other reliever listed on Seattle's 40-man roster with more than a cup of coffee in the bigs is failed starter Garrett Olson, who gave up more than a hit per inning last year with a terrifying home run rate. So unless you're an immediate family member of Chris Ray (33 saves with Baltimore in 2006, but non-tendered by the Giants this offseason before signing with Seattle), League is the best option of a poor lot. That alone gains him fantasy value, though you'd do well to plan ahead by trading him early if he gets off to a good start.

Don't sleep on Aardsma when he returns, though. At first glance, his 2010 doesn't seem to compare to his productive 2009, but those feelings have been generated by stats which we know don't really apply to relievers, by which I mean his ugly win-loss record (0-6), and an ERA jump of nearly a run over 2009. Beyond that, the Mariners went from 2009 darlings to 2010 disasters, which didn't do much to raise his public profile.

Yet Aardsma was more or less the same pitcher he'd been the year before. His WHIP (1.164 vs. 1.168) was basically identical, he allowed the same hits per nine, and while his strikeouts per nine dropped, it wasn't by an alarming amount. The main problem was that a few rough outings in the early going (two of the five homers he allowed came in one April game), including one in which the Mariners were already behind, caused his ERA to stay artificially high. Since it took until July for the graphics on the television broadcasts to stop showing an ERA over five, his reputation unfairly suffered. From July 1 through the end of the season, Aardsma was excellent (.540 OPS, 2.13 ERA), though with the Mariners out of the race few noticed. Missing the start of 2011 is probably going to allow you to get him on the cheap, which could pay off later in the season.

Joe Nathan & Matt Capps, Minnesota

Before blowing out his elbow and undergoing Tommy John surgery last spring, Joe Nathan was regularly one of the top three or four closers in baseball, dating back to his Twins debut in 2004. Without him, the Twins were forced to patch with guys like Matt Capps, Jon Rauch, and Brian Fuentes, though they generally performed pretty well.

Now, Nathan's on the comeback trail, and we're hearing all of the right reports about his health, with the fact that he got hurt so early last year aiding in his 2011 timeline. He was cleared to begin throwing off a mound back in December, and that went so well that he was recently allowed to start throwing breaking balls. Nathan's apparently feeling so good that he threw a bullpen session for Twins coaches recently and had no qualms about coming inside to Twins manager Ron Gardenhire.

Because of the early date of the injury, Nathan will have had nearly a full year to recover before Opening Day, and it's not unheard of for even an older reliever to come back within that timefame; as Nathan himself notes, Billy Wagner came back eleven months after his own procedure and continued his dominating ways. That doesn't guarantee anything for Nathan, of course, but it does mean he wouldn’t be the first, and all signs are pointing in the right direction here.

So no, we're not breaking out any fancy stats to back up the fact that while Capps was fine last year, Nathan—if healthy—is better. If he's available, he's going to be the closer. This doesn't put Capps' value completely down to zero—there is no guarantee Nathan holds together, and regardless he'll probably be on a limited workload at first—but you know someone in your league is going to see Capps' gaudy 42 saves from last year and jump on him far too early. Don't let it be you, because unless something changes with his comeback, an undervalued Nathan is probably the better play here.

Joel Hanrahan and Evan Meek, Pittsburgh

One of the longest running fantasy subplots last year was, "who takes over the Pirates closer job once Octavio Dotel inevitably gets traded at the deadline?" Dotel did indeed end up being traded to the Dodgers on July 31, yet six months later, we still don't know the answer to that question. Neither Joel Hanrahan or Evan Meek claimed the job for himself after Dotel's departure, and even as recently as late last week GM Neil Huntington refused to provide any clues on who the winner might be.

So we're left with the stats, and here it's ever more important to filter out the pieces which we know are completely irrelevant. Once again, that would be ERA (where Meek's 2.14 is a lot shinier than Hanrahan's 3.62) and particularly Meek's All-Star appearance, which not only should have gone to Andrew McCutchen but was the result of a totally flawed system. The more advanced statistics generally preferred Hanrahan, including WXRL (2.553 to 2.030) and fWAR (1.4 to 0.8). It's not hard to see why: while Meek and Hanrahan each walked roughly 3.5/9, Hanrahan's strikeout rate was far superior, as he whiffed 12.9/9 to Meek's 7.9/9.

Throwing another wrench into the mix, however, is that the Pirates are starting their first season under new manager Clint Hurdle. Hanrahan seemed to slowly be moving into the role late in the season—10 of his 14 September appearances were to finish games, compared to just four of Meek's 12—but it's difficult to know how much carryover there would be under new leadership. 

With the facts on the table, it's probably no surprise that I recommend Hanrahan as the superior pitcher to Meek. One would hope that the Pirates make the same call.

Mike Petriello is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Mike's other articles. You can contact Mike by clicking here

14 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

grandslam28

Wow this is the first article I have ever seen talk up Aardsma. Al most every other thing I read talks about is luckiness and that 2009 was a complete fluke, not 2010.

Feb 03, 2011 11:06 AM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Mike Petriello
BP staff

For relievers, with their small sample sizes, I do think luck always plays something of a role, but whether you think that in 2009 he was lucky good, or in 2010 he was unlucky bad, the peripheral stats show that he was more or less the same guy.

I really do think the fact that he had rough outings sooner rather than later hurt his perception. What if he'd had the exact same year overall, but his lousy outings were in September rather than April and May? People would have seen a "1.50 ERA" (or whatever) all year before it ballooned, and he'd have been thought of better for months.

Feb 03, 2011 11:55 AM
 
grandslam28

What I read on HQ has him with an unlucky fly ball to HR ratio which is what I believe you are talking about him being unlucky. But also over the past two years he has had a very lucky H% (Hits allowed per balls in play) of 27% in 09 and 24% in 10. And given that he is not a dominant pitcher like Mo I would assume these would go way up to where they were the previous two years at around 35%. Now he probably is a better pitcher than he was, but I wouldn't ever say he has dominant stuff.


Another stat HQ generates is called BPV, base performance value, has him at 69 & 52.

Below is from Baseball HQ on how BPV is derived.

Pitching BPV: ((Dominance Rate - 5.0) x 18) + ((4.0 - Walk rate) x 27) + (Ground ball rate as whole number - 40)

This formula combines the individual raw skills of dominance, control and the ability to keep the ball on the ground, all characteristics that are unaffected by most external team factors. In tandem with a pitcher's strand rate, it provides a complete picture of the elements that contribute to a pitcher's ERA, and therefore serves as an accurate tool to project likely changes in ERA. BENCHMARKS: A BPV of 50 is the minimum level required for long-term success. The elite of the bullpen aces will have BPV's in excess of 100 and it is rare for these stoppers to enjoy long term success with consistent levels under 75.

Feb 03, 2011 12:17 PM
rating: 0
 
grandslam28

I'd also like to know what people's opinion are on who will be the closer for the Angels & Orioles. I think Downs bc he is the best reliever in the bullpen and they have shown to willing to use a lefty to close.

Feb 03, 2011 11:10 AM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Mike Petriello
BP staff

Thanks for the comments. I've talked about each of them in recent weeks.

ANGELS: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=12591

I agree with you that I do think it'll likely be Downs to start the season, though I really like Jordan Walden there.

ORIOLES: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=12687

They paid Gregg the big money, so I expect him to close, but I do like Uehara there as well.

Feb 03, 2011 11:53 AM
 
grandslam28

Also is Frank Francisco the clear favorite to be the closer in Toronto?

Feb 03, 2011 12:03 PM
rating: 0
 
R.A.Wagman

No. It is truly open season out here. Based on everything so far reported, I would hazard that Francisco/Rauch each have a 35% chance to be the 9th-inning designate, while Frasor/Dotel come in with approximately 15% chances each.
Of course, in sports, everyone has to give 110%, so I'll give David Purcey the bonus 10%.

Feb 03, 2011 12:12 PM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Mike Petriello
BP staff

I think R.A's pretty close here, though I'd probably give Dotel more of a chance than Frasor.

Feb 03, 2011 12:23 PM
 
R.A.Wagman

Dotel did get more press when he signed ("we'll give him every chance to win the role...") but AA and John Farrell are no dummies and they know his splits as well (better, really) than we do.

Feb 03, 2011 12:33 PM
rating: 0
 
matty24

Any word if Broxton has the green light as the closer, or will Kuo split with him early on?

Feb 03, 2011 12:35 PM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Mike Petriello
BP staff

As a Dodger blogger, that's a topic which is near and dear to my heart, and I'll probably look at in more depth next week. The early word, however, is Broxton, though the leash will not be long.

Feb 03, 2011 13:13 PM
 
grandslam28

How close is Kenley Jansen to being the closer if Broxton falters?

Feb 03, 2011 14:48 PM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Mike Petriello
BP staff

He's in the mix, and I'll get into it deeper next week. He's so raw that it's hard to count on him just yet, though very talented. Don't forget Vicente Padilla, too.

Feb 03, 2011 15:43 PM
 
Andrew
(38)

Not following the two Pirates' charts - How is Hanrahan recommended (just because of more points?), yet Meek has the better dollar-value and positional ranking?

Regardless of the charts, I agree with the analysis, I just wanted to see if/how they correlate.

Feb 03, 2011 16:27 PM
rating: 0
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article Overthinking It: A Lit... (02/03)
<< Previous Column
Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: The Cons... (02/02)
Next Column >>
Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Dead to ... (02/04)
Next Article >>
Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Shootin... (02/03)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Premium Article League Preview Series
Every Team's Moneyball: Minnesota Twins: Reb...
Premium Article Skewed Left: History Repeats Itself
Premium Article League Preview Series
Premium Article Pitching Backward: Why Relievers Get A Free ...
Premium Article Spring Training Notebook: Cactus League
Prospectus Feature: How the Astros do Spring...

MORE FROM FEBRUARY 3, 2011
The BP Broadside: In Which Mr. Brown Does No...
Purpose Pitches: The Sorry State of Platooni...
Premium Article Prospectus Hit and Run: Five Moves the AL Ea...
The BP Wayback Machine: Baseball's Y2K1 Bugs
Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Shooting Blanks
Premium Article Overthinking It: A Little Bit Softer Now
Premium Article Prospectus Q&A: Prospect Edition

MORE BY MIKE PETRIELLO
2011-02-16 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Value Picks in the Outfield
2011-02-10 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Value Picks in the Bullpen
2011-02-09 - Fantasy Beat: Donnybrook - Jimmy Rollins
2011-02-03 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Value Picks in the Bullpen
2011-01-27 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Hot Spots: Relief Pitchers
2011-01-20 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Hot Spots: Relief Pitchers
2011-01-13 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Hot Spots: Relief Pitchers
More...

MORE FANTASY BEAT
2011-02-07 - Fantasy Beat: BP Scoresheet Early Draft Prep
2011-02-04 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Value Picks in the Rotation
2011-02-04 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Dead to Me
2011-02-03 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Value Picks in the Bullpen
2011-02-02 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: The Constant Gardner
2011-02-02 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Value Picks at First Base, Thi...
2011-02-01 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Value Picks at Catcher, Second...
More...

INCOMING ARTICLE LINKS
2011-03-10 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Value Picks in the Bullpen
2011-02-21 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Closer Rankings
2011-02-17 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Beat: Value Picks in the Bullpen