BP Comment Quick Links
| Home | Unfiltered | Articles | Newsletter | Statistics | Fantasy | Events | Radio | Glossary | Search |
![]() |
|
|
|
November 25, 2009 So You NeedFiremen
As an understanding of advanced metrics has taken hold in major-league front offices, the market for free-agent relievers has shrunk considerably, even allowing for the harsh economic climate of the past two winters. Teams that were once willing to shell out multi-year contracts for closers and top set-up men are increasingly shying away from such deals, realizing that reliever performances are fairly volatile from year to year due to sample sizes (to say nothing of injuries), that free-agent compensation rules disproportionately penalize teams for signing relievers, and that they can do just about as well by hunting for bargains or giving opportunities to their own youngsters. Consider this data from the past three winters compiled via ESPN's Free Agent Tracker: Year Guar Years Avg $ per Avg Years 1 2 3 4 2007 36 55 $3.34 mil 1.53 24 6 5 1 2008 28 43 $5.12 mil 1.54 19 5 2 2 2009 32 44 $3.83 mil 1.38 22 8 2 0 All years refer to the seasons for which the contracts took effect, which differs from the Tracker's view of attaching the numbers to the season just past; this makes more sense, I think. The number of relievers who were guaranteed contracts (Guar) rose slightly from 2008 to 2009, but the average length declined by 10 percent and the average guaranteed salary fell by 25 percent. Furthermore, where 15 percent of reliever contracts in 2007 and 2008 were for more than two years, just six percent of the ones signed for 2009 were. Among the current crop of free-agent firemen, there's a considerable chasm between the top six and the rest of the field, as injuries, platoon issues, and lower strikeout rates make it much harder to distinguish which pitchers are worthy investments. Given the volatility of single-season sample sizes, all data presented in the table below is for 2007 through 2009, all bases on balls rates have been adjusted to exclude intentional walks, and all batted ball rates both in the table and elsewhere in the piece refer to the MLB Advanced Media data we use for our sortables; you'll see different numbers on FanGraphs, Hardball Times, and elsewhere. Asterisks denote left-handers: Rk Pitcher IP ERA K/9 BB/9 HR/9 K/BB GB% QERA FRA_r WXRL 1 Billy Wagner* 131.0 2.40 10.9 2.5 0.8 4.4 38.7% 2.94 3.28 5.5 2 Rafael Betancourt 206.1 3.05 8.9 1.8 0.8 5.0 30.7% 3.58 3.12 9.3 3 Rafael Soriano 161.2 2.95 10.5 2.4 1.1 4.4 32.5% 3.22 3.07 7.8 4 Jose Valverde 190.1 2.84 10.3 2.9 1.0 3.5 38.9% 3.39 2.94 10.0 5 Darren Oliver* 209.1 3.10 7.1 2.1 0.6 3.4 47.6% 4.01 3.47 6.2 6 Mike Gonzalez* 125.0 2.81 10.6 3.2 0.9 3.3 38.5% 3.61 3.56 4.8 7 Brandon Lyon 212.0 3.31 6.0 2.3 0.7 2.6 44.5% 4.92 3.67 7.6 8 LaTroy Hawkins 180.2 3.14 6.1 2.3 0.8 2.6 52.2% 4.28 3.19 3.2 10 Brian Shouse* 127.0 3.26 5.8 1.6 0.7 3.6 60.4% 4.10 3.57 2.7 Chan Ho Park 182.2 4.14 7.7 3.0 0.9 2.6 49.1% 4.18 3.49 3.0 Octavio Dotel 160.0 3.66 11.7 3.9 1.3 3.0 36.8% 3.48 4.52 3.3 Fernando Rodney 166.2 4.48 8.9 4.5 0.9 2.0 52.2% 4.33 4.74 4.8 J.J. Putz 147.1 2.93 9.6 3.3 0.7 2.9 43.4% 3.63 2.91 7.3 Russ Springer 173.1 2.86 8.8 2.6 0.8 3.4 28.3% 3.97 3.09 2.4
1. Billy Wagner: Even at 37 years old and coming off Tommy John surgery, and pitching primarily in a lower-leverage role (0.98 LEV) in the AL East, Billy Wags blew hitters away during his late-season return. He struck out 26 in 15
|
Is Billy Wagner no longer left handed or did he not get an asterisk because he's not a LOOGY type?
He didn't get an asterisk because I'm a dolt who doesn't proofread his own work carefully enough. He is indeed left-handed.
Sorry to nitpick you there, Jay. Good article!
Thanks, and no worries. In my book, it's a perfectly appropriate nitpick if it's the first guy on the damn list.
Fixed.
Interestingly enough, while Billy Wagner might be a left-handed pitcher, he is in fact a right-handed human.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Wagner