BP Comment Quick Links
| Home | Unfiltered | Articles | Newsletter | Statistics | Fantasy | Events | Radio | Glossary | Search |
![]() |
|
|
|
October 18, 2009 Prospectus TodayAbsent Without Leaveby Joe Sheehan
I get accused of bias quite often, so I'm going to cop to one here. When I wrote : For the sake of everyone involved—by which I mean 50,000-odd baseball fans currently chugging Theraflu prophylatically—let's hope MLB makes a call on this game early. … If it's going to rain all night—and it's going to rain all night—call it at 4 p.m. and show that you give a darn about the fans. …it wasn't entirely a neutral position. I've been pretty sick since Thursday, and because of that and the brutal forecast, I gave up a ticket to last night's game. It just seemed like a bad decision, during the busiest month of my year, to spend four hours with a whole bunch of strangers in the rain and cold when I'm already fighting off something that's affecting my ability to work. It was the mature, professional thing to do. Maybe I should have resigned, because not only did it not rain for most of the night, but as you all know, Game Two of the ALCS was a classic contest that will be remembered for years. In what has become one of those Octobers, one of those months that leaves you breathless until Thanksgiving, last night's game may be the signature game. We got five hours and ten minutes of baseball that, fittingly, wasn't always clean, wasn't always well-umpired, wasn't always played in the best of conditions, but nonetheless left us even more in love with the game than ever before. It ended, appropriately, with a series of mistakes. With first and second and one out in the 13th, Maicer Izturis ranged to his left to play a ground ball by Melky Cabrera. Instead of taking the out at first base, a sure play, he tried to wheel and get the runner at second. His poor throw was what allowed Jerry Hairston Jr. to round third and score the winning run, but it was the decision that was the real problem. There was no chance at all at a double play, given how far Izturis had to range and that Cabrera started from the left-hand batter's box. The value of the runner going to second was zero; the only runner who mattered was Hairston, who was going to third in all cases. Even nominally "keeping the force alive" wasn't in play, as Cabrera would have likely taken an unoccupied second base via defensive indifference on the next pitch. Izturis chased a play with no chance of success and a high risk of catastrophic failure—the spin throw to second is a tough play under the best of circumstances—for absolutely no benefit. The decision was the first mistake, the throw the second. Perhaps lost in the chaos is that if Chone Figgins takes his time and makes a clean play on the errant throw, he would have had a great shot at gunning down Hairston at home plate; I would go so far as to say Hairston was a dead duck. Perhaps understandably, Figgins wasn't able to get a handle on the ball, and his bobble was the final mistake that ended the game. Physical errors happen, but the mental error, losing sight of the importance, or lack thereof, of a baserunner, was the real cause of the game-winning run.
BP Comment Quick Links RayDiPerna (49549) "Saunders turned, located his middle infielders, paused and fired a clean strike to first that made the double play possible." RayDiPerna (49549) "He'll never get an apology. That's not how it works, of course. Whether you base your evaluations on careful analysis of performance or on pop psychology, you never have to apologize." kradec (175) Sorry, Joe, I can't agree on the neighborhood play. First of all, it's a stupid habit the umpires have gotten into. Secondly, the FOX truck guys checked -- on every other DP in the game, Aybar actually touched the bag. On that one, he didn't even come close, he straddled it. Richard Bergstrom (36532) I'd never heard of a "neighborhood play". Sure the strike zone can get a bit amorphous, but if there is no point in the fielder actually touching the bag or tagging the runner, then why should I, as a fan, get excited about close plays? Richard Bergstrom (36532) I set this up as a reply intended for Joe when I use the words "You". I agree with kradec and applaud umpires for following the rulebook. thenamestsam (47018) I agree that following the rulebook is ideal, but consistency is more important than correctness, and regardless of what happened on the other double plays in that game, that's just not a call that umpires make. The most important thing is that the players know what rules they're playing by, not what the actual rule is, and that principle was violated. buddaley (26251) I want to reiterate what I say below. The umpire was being consistent. When there is no imminent collision, umpires routinely call runners safe if the pivot man does not make a stab at the base. Aybar made a bad play, or at least an awkward one, and the penalty was perfectly consistent with how calls are made. Dr. Dave (1652) In other words, Aybar misread the unwritten rule, and was penalized for it? That seems to reinforce the idea that it's most important that the players know what rules are going to be enforced. It's not intuitively obvious, even to someone who's been watching MLB for a long time, that the rule is "you have to make a sham attempt". vgalloro (13767) I disagree with your last sentence. The first thing that I thought when I watched the replay was that Aybar didn't drag his foot or make any other attempt to even get in the neighborhood of the bag, so to speak. Richard Bergstrom (36532) Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway. How can you get more consistent than "Was his foot on the bag when he had the ball?" Anything less than that, no matter _how_ you slice it, is a judgment call and inconsistent. Dr. Dave (1652) You're conflating 2 separate issues: Richard Bergstrom (36532) Then I'm now firmly in the "replace umpires with computers" camp. If umpires are lacking consistent judgment on what rules are enforced when, can't properly call a fair or foul ball, and at their most egregious, hold grudges or preferences for certain players, then they lost the integrity that should be mandatory for their job. I mean, this goes way beyond a veteran pitcher who "earned" the outside corner. This is to the point where an umpire affects the course of the game when, if an umpire is doing his job correctly, shouldn't even be noticed. Should something like a baseball game, especially a playoff game, be affected by something like umpire bias? WaldoInSC (26415) Why did the ball caroming off Molina and into the stands save the Yankees? Can someone explain that rule, if in fact it exists? It seems to me that, like an errant throw that goes into the stands, the wild pitch allows each runner to advance one base. Since the runners achieved first, second and third by dint of the walk, why didn't the run score on the wild pitch? Joe D. (3692) Explanation and rule reference located here: WaldoInSC (26415) Thanks Joe. My interpretation of that rule is that the runners get one base, which would bring Aybar home and set up second and third. At the moment that the ball went into the stands, Aybar had already earned third, Figgins second and Hunter first. I think the umps blew it and cost the Angels a run -- and the game. ScottyB (23917) Runner gets one base from where they are when the ball leaves the field of play. The ump *could* have given Aybar home plate if he felt he had already gotten to 3rd (which may have been the case). Umps can also give the baserunner on 1st 3 bases on a ground-rule double, too, but you never see it called. WaldoInSC (26415) Where Aybar was physically located was irrelevant. He could have fallen on his face at second base and never gotten up; he was still awarded third the moment Hunter earned the walk. The umps -- and Fox -- blew it. I'm surprised that no one else is picking up on it since it was determinative. BP staff (17) The pitch occurs before the umpire's call, is how I would look at it. Aybar didn't advance to third on the walk, and then get a base on the WP. He advanced on the WP, and then wasn't forced on the subsequent walk. Oct 19, 2009 10:19 AM Dan (14055) Joe, I'm surprised you didn't mention Girardi's usage of Joba. I thought he pulled him from the game unnecessarily after only 1/3 of an inning, in a 2-2 game, and the only reason I could think of that he'd do it is that "Phil Hughes has to work the 8th" and "Rivera has to work the 9th." Kampfer (46660) Joba was not pitching well. Sliders were all over the place. I think that's why Girardi pulled him BP staff (17) I agree, and will add that I'm not sure they wanted Joba getting up and down. Hughes is better than he is by a fair amount, and that's the guy you want pitching the eighth in a tied game. Oct 18, 2009 13:38 PM Flynnbot (11291) So, in a game that it was easy to see going extras (perhaps many extras), using your two best setup men for a total of 21 pitches (not to mention Marte for one batter) makes sense? Joe D. (3692) Absolutely. Playing several innings ahead is a great way to potentially lose now, and thus never get to "later". Flynnbot (11291) How is throwing in Hughes for Joba---hyped all week as a possible 8th inning option---after 10 pitches "playing several innings ahead"? If not, then why was Hughes not brought in the 7th to take over for Burnett? Because he's an 8th inning guy? That's a little rigid, no? Joe D. (3692) I'm arguing *against* playing several innings ahead. Flynnbot (11291) It's not worrying about the 15th inning...it's about putting your best pitchers on the mound to give your chance to win. thenamestsam (47018) It seems to me that what Girardi did was the best for keeping the Angels scoreless through 9 and through 10. He got his best pitchers in the game. It was worse for keeping them scoreless in the 11th and beyond if it came to that. How to balance those priorities requires looking at how likely the game was to get to the 11th and beyond. With the two best offenses in baseball, I'd venture to say fairly unlikely, but I don't know the exact number, it's an interesting question to take a look at. buddaley (26251) I agree with everything you say, Joe, except for one comment where I think you are dead wrong. The umpire made exactly the right call on Aybar. strupp (6603) Thanks... I was trying to imply this same argument last night and failed to put it in words as proper as this. I agree 100%, the basis for the neighborhood play has been to aid the middle infielder in avoiding contact and potential injury. It was not necessary in this specific instance. Richard Bergstrom (36532) Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway. So umpires make calls now to protect fielders against injury? So do catchers get automatic outs at home plate as long as they receive the ball before the runner gets there? Does that also mean that a runner attempting to break up a double play is against the spirit of the game too? Yes it's a slippery slope argument, but it shouldn't be an argument in the first place. These guys make millions of dollars because they are the top athletes in the country, if not the world, in baseball. PaulieNeu (32327) If you paid $50 to see that, considering it was at Yankee Stadium...you were sitting outside my friend. Richard Bergstrom (36532) Nah Coors Field. Once incident in particular from this year comes to mind where the Cubs were playing the Rockies and a ball was hit to Tulowitzki, who threw it to Barmes at 2B. Barmes was at least a foot off the bag but the runner was still called out. Lou came out to argue and was thrown out. ottosboys (20502) Actually the secondary market was soft for this game - my brother and I got grandstand (upper deck) seats for $52 apiece on stubhub less than 48 hrs before game time. Dr. Dave (1652) Actually, the most common phantom DP comes when the pivot man crosses the bag (and leaves it) before he receives the ball. This is essentially always called an out, despite the obvious advantage it gives the defense. (The pivot man doesn't have to worry about foot and ball simultaneously, he can get well out of the way of the oncoming runner, and he's closer to the player throwing him the ball, allowing a faster pivot.) jtrichey (6611) I also think the ump made the right call on the so called nieghborhood play in this instance. The majority of the time on that call, the middle infielder is at least on the bag at some point. Aybar never touched the bag at any point in the play, and frankly never came that close to touching the bag. To call him out there would be taking the neighborhood play to far over the extreme, and THAT would have truly been the farce. Alex Nixon (31305) "One of the dozen best players in baseball history was demoted to the eighth spot because his own manager couldn't see past a week's worth of failure. That will always be the low point of Joe Torre's tenure in New York." amazin_mess (9525) Joe - amazin_mess (9525) "In what has become one of those Octobers, one of those months that leaves you breathless until Thanksgiving, last night's game may be the signature game." hyprvypr (11082) Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway. Good series, but awful hard to feel good about the richest team in baseball winning. No one should like the favorite, but it seems plenty of bonehead, selfish fans do exactly that. ScottyB (23917) Well, one generally roots for the team they grow up geographically closest too, unless their dad is a big fan of some other team, so it is not Yankke fan's fault they are Yankees fans Joe D. (3692) "No one should like the favorite, but it seems plenty of bonehead, selfish fans do exactly that." R.A.Wagman (32721) Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway. What if what baseball needed to do to be more popular was not connected with the cap, but with the game itself? What if baseball used a ball more similar to a basketball? Or stretched it out to resemble a football? Would more people watch? Would you? amazin_mess (9525) Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway. It'll get worse before it gets better. MLB needs a floor and a cap - and until they do, the NFL will keep kicking its ass. OldBean (24939) Better at what exactly? Making the owners rich(er)? Because yeah, the NFL probably does kick MLB's ass at that... not on competitive balance, though. Adam Hobson (29493) I don't get why every sports league needs to operate the exact same way... Do MLB players need to wear shoulder pads and girdles because NFL players do as well? Should baseball switch to a 16 games schedule with only a single game a week? TADontAsk (2173) I believe the NFL may operate next season without a cap. I'm sure they won't lose any fans. hyprvypr (11082) Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway. The NFL crushes MLB when it comes to marketing, popularity and competetive balance. Joe D. (3692) Re: "Your stats about the playoffs naturally ignores the fact that the NFL has 50% more playoff teams every year so obviously more teams can make the playoffs at a higher frequency." TADontAsk (2173) Joe D. - also for your argument is the fact that the NFL schedules are unbalanced every year. No explanation of NFL team year-to-year performance is complete without considering that. A first place team gets a "first place schedule", and ditto for a last place team. That makes season-to-season variation much more likely. A bad team can play a weak division and 2 other last place teams. So if teams can constantly be near the top despite these more competitive schedules, I'd think that can factor into an argument of competitive balance. hyprvypr (11082) Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway. Also, in the NFL, plenty of teams that were great one year are bad the next, or visa versa. This very rarely happens in baseball. Teams that are bad generally stay bad and teams that win generally continue to win. The playoff droughts and world series wins droughts back this up as well. Joe D. (3692) Re: "Also, in the NFL, plenty of teams that were great one year are bad the next, or visa versa. This very rarely happens in baseball." greg26 (34365) The problem with MLB is not that some teams make the playoffs a lot. It's that many teams start the season with very little chance of making the playoffs. Instead of citing that 10 WS have had 15 teams, look at the teams that have made the playoffs with stunning infrequency in the last 20 years. That's what is unfortunate about MLB. R.A.Wagman (32721) Part of that is due to their being so few teams in the playoffs. There aren't too many people out there who are even arguing for anything more than a second wildcard team per league with a 1- or 3-game playoff between wildcards to kick the playoffs off. BP staff (17) I'm not wading into too much of this, but 16-game seasons and 12/32 teams reaching the postseason drive the perception gap when it comes to competitive balance. It's a math problem--you can't get very much separation over 16 games, and a couple of "lucky" events can have a huge effect on your season. Oct 19, 2009 10:14 AM ElAngelo (942) Joe: I agree that it was good that Saunders made the pause to set himself up to try to turn the double play, but the fact is that Jeter should have been called safe. Arguably, this pause should have cost the team the double play. Mountainhawk (37208) It's hard to believe their are people that still argue that MLB is as balanced as the NFL. It's not even close people. Richard Bergstrom (36532) Just as an addendum, I would bet that getting to the playoffs in MLB benefits MLB teams more, financially, than getting to the NFL playoffs as an NFL team. If a MLB team gets to the playoffs, that team is guaranteed at least one additional home game and as many as eleven where in the NFL, you get maybe two additional games (and then a Super Bowl featured at a neutral site). Mountainhawk (37208) I believe profits from the NFL playoffs are mostly, if not completely, distributed equally among the 32 teams. yankee (5611) Great column. Best analysis I've seen, far superior to the public prints. I often read/hear comments made during and after ball games that I know are wrong , but I'm unable to articulate what the problem is. To quote a British historian:It's like knitting without a guillotine".One can't beat good writing and good analysis. dzahniser (47008) Joe, I don't know how old you are but I'm 44. I can tell you the Denlinger call is the single worst moment in baseball for me. I'm inspired to do a blogpost about instant replay. hyprvypr (11082) More on the ridiculously unbalanced MLB structure compared to the NFL... amazin_mess (9525) I totally agree. And there are a lot of idiots out there.
|




71 comments have been left for this article.
Great analysis, as always. Regarding Damon--because Girardi had pinch run Gardner for Swisher in the 7th, he didn't have anyone other than Hairston to put in LF. It would've helped had they had Hinske on the roster, but they felt the need for three catchers...Girardi's overmanaging made that run possible.