I want to share a very personal fantasy with you, something I think about only late at night when no one else is awake. My fantasy is that in this year’s annual, under Rod Barajas it will say, “See Miguel Olivo,” and under Miguel Olivo it will say, “See Rod Barajas.”
See, one of them is a .239/.284/.409 career hitter with 91 home runs in 2484 career at-bats. The other is a .243/.278/.424 hitter with 96 home runs in 2471 at-bats. Baseball-Reference.com lists Olivo and Barajas as each other’s most similar players. One key difference is that at least this year Olivo is worth playing (3.9 WARP3) and Barajas (2.6 WARP3) is probably not. In truth, neither is really all that ideal, not if you accept the idea that on-base percentage is king. Of course, it’s very easy to say that, and another thing to go out and fetch yourself up even an average offensive catcher. This year, the average major league catcher is hitting only .254/.321/.396. It’s a tough position to fill, and the emphasis on defense seems to require the sacrifice of offense, even at the cost of a drop all the way to the offensive replacement level… Or does it?
Jorge Posada has made five All-Star teams, won five Silver Slugger Awards, and twice finished in the top ten in the MVP voting, but he’s never won a Gold Glove Award, and he never will-and that’s the best thing about him. He’s never been a very good defensive catcher, one of the reasons that then-Yankees manager Joe Torre elected to have Joe Girardi “tutor” him from 1997 to 1999 (sacrificing large chunks of Posada’s age-25 through age-27 seasons) despite minor league numbers that suggested that Posada should at the very least be able to top the meager .261/.303/.354 with obscene double-play rates that Girardi posted during that time.
One imagines the reason that Posada has rarely posted great caught-stealing numbers (his career rate is 29 percent), his approach to balls in the dirt is to hunt for them with the dugout dust-vac (he leads active players in passed balls), and that for the first half of his career he blocked the plate from the safety of the dugout is that he is not a natural-born catcher. When he was selected by the Yankees in the 24th round of the 1990 draft, Posada entered their system as a shortstop. The Yankees didn’t think he had the quickness to play short, but they liked his bat. They gave him a try at second base his first year, and though Posada led the New York-Penn League in turning double plays, the Yankees had the prescience to see that Posada would slow up too dramatically to play the keystone in the bigs. Given that he had just hit .235 with four home runs in 71 games (albeit with 51 walks) first base wasn’t a likely destination. So, after the season, they sent him to their instructional league to have him give catching a try, and he’s been behind the plate ever since.
In recent years, teams have made a cottage industry of trying catchers with strong arms but limited offensive abilities at pitcher, and have dug up the odd hard-throwing relievers that way; the most famous example is Troy Percival, though he no longer throws all that hard a couple of decades later. However, it isn’t often that players who would have the bat to be an offensive asset behind the plate but are subpar hitters for first base or right field-thus dooming them to Quad-A careers-get tried as catchers. The reasons for this are usually defensive-minded in nature: catchers have several skills to learn, among them pitch-calling, plate blocking (both in the sense of fielding balls in the dirt and collision survival), and throwing. This is a big course-load for a player to pick up in just a few years of minor league training, all done under the pressure of trying to win actual ballgames. No team wants to create the next Mackey Sasser, which is to say that although in taking a player who had spent the first two seasons of his minor league career at first base, third base, and the outfield and putting him behind the plate, the Giants organization did succeed in taking a bat which would have been inadequate at any of those positions and moved it to a position where it was an asset but he was so stressed by the effort to play his new position that his career fell apart. Then again, what is the loss of a potential minor league journeyman compared to the creation of a weapon off the bench or a player who, in a moment of desperation, may save you from Olivo or Barajas starting, or worse, Kevin Cash, Corky Miller, or Eli Whiteside?
There have been successful cases besides Posada, and their transformations came later in their minor league careers. John Wockenfuss, who came reached the majors in 1974, didn’t become a catcher until his fifth year in the minors. A 42nd-round pick in the 1967 draft, he would grow up to be a .262/.349/.432 hitter who was at his best as the short end of a platoon, hitting .273/.364/.488 against southpaws (against .244/.324/.338 against righties), was. When he hit under .200 in his first minor league season, it might have been somewhat surprising that he was not released given that he was selected at the rump end of the draft. However, the Senators/Rangers gave him time to mature, promoting him up to Double-A after a few seasons, and found that they had a hitter with a .250 bat in a good year, 10-15 home-run power in a full season, and an excellent batting eye. Wockenfuss would never make it as an outfielder, not with that kind of production, so in 1972, in his age-23 season, he was moved behind the dish. His bat came to life as he was learning his new position, so when he hit a combined .280/.397/.477 in 127 games in parts of two American Association seasons for the Tigers organization (he had arrived there after a couple of trades), they brought him up as a backup to the aging Bill Freehan. Wockenfuss not only caught, but also filled in at first base, the outfield corners, and designated hitter. He could have been a career minor leaguer, and given that it took him seven years to get to the majors, he nearly was one, but what the Tigers (and subsequently the Phillies) got was a player more versatile and far more dangerous than the typical reserve catcher.
Gene Tenace, mainstay on the dynastic Oakland A’s, didn’t catch a game in the minors until his third season, previously playing mostly in the outfield, and he had an apprenticeship behind the plate of only 168 games. He was one of the most productive catchers of all time due to his power and excellent eye at the plate and played on six post-season teams, including four champions. He caught nearly 900 games in the big leagues, and also played over 600 games at first base and made cameos every else on the field except shortstop. Tenace was an everyday starting catcher in just one season, 1975, though he was a regular from 1973 on, the A’s and his subsequent employers preferring to move him around the field. Again, lack of defensive excellence was transformed into versatility.
Bob Brenly was drafted at 22, but he was 25 before he caught a game in the minors. A career .247/.330/.403 hitter in the majors, he wouldn’t have been able to play anywhere but where he did play. The future winning manager of the 2001 World Series could hit a little for a third baseman, at least in the low minors, but it was clear that he was going to have problems fielding .900 in the majors. The Giants brought him along slowly, not really committing to him as a catcher, so that by the time he went up to Candlestick Park he had caught only 117 games. In the majors the Giants spotted him at third base from time to time against their better judgment, but mostly he caught. With his third baseman’s arm he was able to nail 35 percent of attempted basestealers. His catching skills were sufficient for him to participate on one postseason team, the 1987 Giants.
These are just a few success stories, and there are others. Doubtless there have been more than a few failures or near-misses, players who have washed out at the low levels of the minors before we even became more than peripherally aware of them. Still, there are likely far more than haven’t been tried. Just name a minor league journeyman at random; Albuquerque’s Mitch Jones, now 31, comes to find. He’s hit .255/.341/.512 in 1069 minor league games while trying to make it as a left fielder, right fielder, first baseman, and third baseman. Mitch’s low-average, high-strikeout swing was never going to work on a regular basis in the majors, nor was his lack of position, but would a platoon catcher with a big swing be more valuable than, say, Dane Sardinha? Maybe, maybe not, and perhaps probably not, but we can’t know for certain, because it was never tried. You can play this game with countless other Quad-A or even solid Triple-A players like Jones.
In conclusion, though the odds are daunting, though the defensive burden is high, I make this plea, an Iron Eyes Cody tear trickling down my cheek: keep your catchers beautiful, America, and don’t throw away underpowered corner players-recycle!
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.
Subscribe now
Pitchers aren't good hitters because they don't need to be to make the team - few players have a pitcher's skill set, and can survive the physical stress. Same thing goes for Catchers.
1) Catchers don't see from the same angle as hitters, either. It's a different enough perspective on the ball that there is zero ancillary benefit to your eye at the plate, although there might be some small benefit from gauging the strike zone of that particular game's umpire.
2) Round up all the guys in the world who can OPS > .750 against major league pitching. Now hold tryouts to see how many can play acceptable defense at catcher. It's a handful. In the entire world. Now see how many can play 1B. There are tons. Way more than enough for every team in the league. That's why it's the worst hitting position on the field.
If you can hit, it's fine if you are a so-so catcher.
And overall, it's much harder to find a catcher that can hit than a third baseman that can hit... so there's little reason to move Martinez to third.
Russell Martin started as a 3B/2B who didn't have the quickness for the middle infield, or the power for a corner, but has turned into a quality defender.
Carlos Santana started out as a non-prospect at OF/INF, now as a catcher he's a top-50 prospect.
Lucas May spent several years as a SS/OF, but was converted to catcher, he's in AA now, but injuries have held him back. He did hit .306/.388/.468 this year, though.
Anthony Delmonico was drafted as a 2B, but moved catcher in A ball and hit .285/.383/.430 this season.
They've tried some guys that haven't worked so well and even threw around the idea of Blake Dewitt behind the dish. Also, going back to the 90's, the Dodgers turned two 1B, Mike Piazza and Paul LoDuca, into all-stars.
Another idea that's occured to me - Can moving behind the plate actually help a player's hitting? Obviously the physical demands can and will take their toll. But for some players, sitting behind the plate on every pitch, learning exaclty how pitchers attack hitters and how umpires call balls and strikes might be helpful when they're at the plate. Just a thought.
I'm actually a Reds fan... and I'd love to see them do ANYTHING remotely this clever. The Reds strike me as one of the most conservative, risk-averse teams anywhere. They have slightly inferior talent, do everything painfully "by the book" (and with Dusty at the helm, the "book" comes from about 1973), and take their 75 wins and go home...
I think Pedroza had an excellent season in one of the independent leagues this year, but I doubt it was at catcher. McCormick was pushed up to A+ ball during 2009, but failed to hit either at low A or A+.
One reason you don't find as many good hitters at catcher has nothing to do with how difficult it is to play - it's that it is generally bad for your hitting... or, at least, shortening to your career.
Most organizations would not want their franchise hitting prospect playing there unless he had incredible catching skills.
After both teams gave up on him San Diego put him back as a corner guy and would up hitting 295/373/556 with 97 homers over the next three years.
I realize it's anecdotal but an interesting case where it didn't work out for a slugger behind the plate.
One of my Strat-O-Matic league-mates still laments that Carlos Delgado didn't stay a catcher, and I feel the same way about Brandon Inge, Daric Barton, and, apparently, Pablo Sandoval (though he has played 3 games at catcher this year, so should qualify there, and I'll play even his likely c-4 with that offense over Carlos Ruiz).
Why would Seattle (or more recently, the Pirates) not try Jeff Clement at catcher, for the offense, consistent with the Posada story? Is he that truly abysmal?