CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article Under The Knife: Warni... (09/09)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Checking the Numbers: ... (09/07)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Checking the Numbers: ... (09/18)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Future Shock: Minor Le... (09/09)

September 9, 2009

Checking the Numbers

A Giant Run-Scoring Problem

by Eric Seidman

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

In what may amount to a playoff matchup come October, the San Francisco Giants beat the Philadelphia Phillies last week by a score of 5-3. A good ballgame by the sound of it, right? Wrong, because that 5-3 score constituted the run-scoring of the entire three-game series, two of which the Giants lost. The Giants are no strangers to run prevention, with a starting staff that ranks amongst the best in baseball. While some of their pitchers' peripherals portend less success moving forward, that does not mean we can simply write off data to date as fraudulent or nonexistent. This season, their starting rotation has for the most part been able to make do with two or three runs of support in a game, a range that has unfortunately become the norm for an anemic offense largely comprised of over-the-hill veterans and young players without much upside. Outside of Pablo Sandoval, the lineup appears to be allergic to league-average production, scoring an awful aggregate 3.95 runs per game. Yet somehow and some way, they are no further than two games back in the National League's Wild Card standings, and have a realistic shot of qualifying for post-season play. With this in mind, where does this Giants team rank relative to other no-hit/all-pitch teams? And, more to the point: how have teams in similar composition generally fared, especially relative to their potential playoff prospects?

The investigative process began by pooling together team data from 1954-2008, determining the record for each club, calculating the RS/G for each team in every season, and comparing that figure to their respective league's averages. From there, we subtract the league average from the individual team RS/G to find the RS/G Delta, because the ultimate goal does not involve discovering comparable teams based on a static number like 3.95 RS/G or a range along the lines of 3.90-4.00 RS/G; rather, the goal involves a comparison of team-wide offensive production relative to a league-average offense.

The 2009 Giants, for instance, are averaging 3.95 RS/G in a circuit averaging 4.44 RS/G, a -0.49 delta. The same process was then repeated for pitchers, but in order to make the comparisons more accurate I chose to compile the data solely for pitchers with 15 or more starts in a season; the Giants bullpen may have talent, but nobody really has any misconceptions that the bulk of this team's success comes from anywhere but its starting rotation. As of Monday evening, the Giants' starting staff had produced a solid 3.51 RA/9 in a league populated by qualifying starters averaging a 4.34 RA/9. The resulting delta of 0.83 runs per nine innings ranks as approximately the 30th best across the 1,330 teams in the sample. Overall, 295 of the 1,330 teams boasted an RA/9 among their starting pitchers lower than the league average while also fielding a below-average offense. Of those 295 teams, 43 made the playoffs in one way or another, and of those, nine went onto win the World Series. Most recently, the 2005 White Sox reached that pinnacle of success, as did the 1997 Marlins, the 1996 Yankees, and the 1995 Braves.

Of course, the aforementioned filter was quite broad, ignoring the extent to which the offenses or pitching staffs strayed from the respective averages. The 1996 Yanks and 1997 Marlins, for instance, were ever so slightly below average on offense, making them poor comparables for a Giants team that is supremely better than average in its starting rotation, but hampered by an offense that is a half-run per game off the pace of the league.

Since 1954, only two teams have ever finished the season with an RS/G Delta of -0.40 or fewer runs that also employed a starting staff 0.80 runs per nine innings better than the league: the 2003 Dodgers (85-77), and the 1996 Marlins (80-82), neither of whom made the playoffs. The Giants, however, have an advantage in that their RA/9 Delta would top the list of all teams with an RS/G delta of -0.40 or fewer runs. The table below outlines teams with the same constraints, ordered by their RA/9 deltas:


                 RS/G      RA/9
Year  Team       Delta     Delta      W-L
2003  Dodgers    -1.07      0.83     85-77
1979  Astros     -0.63      0.78     89-73
1987  Royals     -0.49      0.77     83-79
2008  Athletics  -0.77      0.76     75-86
1996  Royals     -0.76      0.75     76-86
1997  Blue Jays  -0.89      0.74     82-80
1964  Angels     -0.72      0.69     77-85
1983  Rangers    -0.57      0.63     73-89
1987  Dodgers    -0.59      0.60     77-83
1989  Dodgers    -0.49      0.57     81-81

None of these ten teams made the playoffs even though a few finished with winning percentages north of the .500 mark. How about a slight variation on that table, where we instead rank the worst offenses amongst teams with an RA/9 delta of 0.45 or better? That gives us this ranking:


                 RS/G      RA/9
Year  Team       Delta     Delta      W-L
2003  Dodgers    -1.07      0.83     85-77
1997  Blue Jays  -0.89      0.74     76-86
1977  Mets       -0.78      0.54     64-98
2008  Athletics  -0.77      0.76     75-86
1996  Royals     -0.76      0.75     75-86
1964  Angels     -0.72      0.69     82-80
1979  Astros     -0.63      0.78     89-73
1999  Padres     -0.62      0.54     74-88
1987  Dodgers    -0.59      0.60     73-89
1983  Rangers    -0.57      0.63     77-85

Some similar faces surface, but again, nobody earned a playoff berth. Since the Giants are still vying for post-season honors, though, what are the worst RS/G Deltas for eventual playoff teams?


                 RS/G     RA/9
Year  Team       Delta    Delta
1973  Mets       -0.38     0.73
1966  Dodgers    -0.36     0.99
1981  Astros     -0.35     0.89
1996  Dodgers    -0.34     0.59
1985  Royals     -0.32     0.71

Just five playoff teams over the last 55 years have fallen below the league average in offensive run production by 0.30 or more runs per game. Each of these teams boasted superb starting pitching that surpassed the league average, much like the Lincecum-led legion. Unfortunately, none of the aforementioned teams disgraced the batter's box as badly as Bochy's bunch. Teams can clearly find their way into playoff baseball with poor offenses and tremendous rotations, but no team has done so with an awful offense even remotely comparable to the one fielded by the 2009 Giants since the Dodgers made the playoffs in the 1996 campaign, and the difference between -0.34 and -0.49 runs per game could range anywhere from 24 to 30 runs or so, a gap of two or three wins.

Should the Giants actually win the wild-card race, they may be a very dangerous team in a short series, but history does not favor their odds given the level of putridity routinely on display in their starting lineup. That's not to say that there isn't precedent, but it's a longshot, and if the Giants make the playoffs while sustaining their current diffident pace on offense, we will be able to brag about witnessing the worst offense of a playoff team in the Wild Card Era, and perhaps even the worst offense fielded by any playoff team in the Retrosheet era. It isn't exactly an accomplishment to proudly proclaim, but it highlights how dynamite their starting rotation has been this season.

A version of this story originally appeared on ESPN Insider Insider.

Eric Seidman is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Eric's other articles. You can contact Eric by clicking here

11 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

oira61

Free Buster Posey! The guy's just sitting on the bench, even during a 12-inning game. And in the one article the San Francisco Chronicle wrote about it, columnist Bruce Jenkins said there is no place for Posey to play, no way for him to even get an at-bat.

Sep 09, 2009 11:45 AM
rating: 2
 
BP staff member Eric Seidman
BP staff

I agree. Let him play. Like now. Right now.

Sep 09, 2009 11:48 AM
 
sbussmann

The fascinating thing to me about the Giants this season isn't just that the team is a collection of studs and duds, but how wildly underpaid the studs are, and conversely how wildy overpaid the duds are. Randy Winn is making $8.25M this year, sheesh!

Sep 09, 2009 12:38 PM
rating: 0
 
obrien
(766)

But Randy Winn is a big part of the reason the pitching staff has been so good. He has great defensive numbers in the metrics I've looked at this year.

In fact, most of the Giants' regulars are above average defenders. It's a big factor a lot of people ignore when talking about how they should have signed players like Adam Dunn or Bobby Abreu. Yes, it would have made the team better, but not by as much as people think. The difference between Winn and Ishikawa on defense and Abreu and Dunn on defense is pretty large.

Sep 09, 2009 13:15 PM
rating: 0
 
WaldoInSC
Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway.

...an anemic offense largely comprised of over-the-hill veterans...

Goode writers know that "comprised" is not a synonym for "composed." Individuals comprise a group; a group is composed of individuals.

I enjoy your articles. Here's your chance to improve as a writer.

Sep 09, 2009 19:09 PM
rating: -7
 
WaldoInSC

An ironic little typo on "good," eh?

Sep 09, 2009 19:13 PM
rating: 3
 
BP staff member Eric Seidman
BP staff

I appreciate the tip as I am always looking to improve as a writer, but maybe send me an e-mail next time and leave the comments thread for an actual discussion of the article.

Sep 09, 2009 19:17 PM
 
Bill N

I think we can stop referring to teams as "dangerous in a short series". That's true of the Royals.

Sep 10, 2009 09:25 AM
rating: -1
 
ScottyB

This article rocked!

Sep 10, 2009 21:12 PM
rating: 0
 
schneidler

I'm an M's fan, and I can attest to the total lack of offense coming out of the defense-first Mariners. Seattle has scored 555 runs in 141 games. SF has 556 runs in 140 games. In addition, the average NL team has 620 runs so far, and average AL team has 673. So SF has 89.7% of the average NL team run total. Seattle has 82.5%. Or to use your methodology, the M's score 3.9 runs a game in a league that averages 4.8, a gap about twice as large as the Giants have. AND they're over .500 and until fairly recently were on the periphery of the postseason picture. Jack Z deserves a lot of credit - like, more than he has received thus far.

And with Branyan on the shelf, it will probably get worse. With the M's its Ichiro, Gutierrez...uh...Lopez...um...shoot. Cincinatti and San Diego are terrible too, but the latter can probably at least blame their park for some of it. I know your article wasn't about "who has the worst offense in baseball," but I wanted to point out that there is another decent team in MLB this year that is likely even worse at scoring.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/team/_/stat/batting/year/2009/seasontype/2

Sep 11, 2009 16:03 PM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Eric Seidman
BP staff

Yeah and if the article was about bad offenses with good records, they would certainly be atop the list. This was more of the worst offenses to potentially make the playoffs. Of course the Giants are terribly unlikely since publication but at the time they were 2 back.

Sep 11, 2009 18:38 PM
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article Under The Knife: Warni... (09/09)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Checking the Numbers: ... (09/07)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Checking the Numbers: ... (09/18)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Future Shock: Minor Le... (09/09)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Premium Article Rubbing Mud: The Quarter-Season Odds Report
West Coast By Us: Day 2: Taco the Town
Going Yard: The Near Perfection of Pederson
West Coast By Us: Day 3: Nice
BP Boston
West Coast By Us: Day 4: There Are Two L's I...
BP Bronx

MORE FROM SEPTEMBER 9, 2009
Premium Article On the Beat: Midweek Update
Prospectus Today: Getting Serious
Premium Article Transaction Action: NL Noodlings
Premium Article Future Shock: Minor League Hitting Leaders T...
Premium Article Under The Knife: Warning Indicators

MORE BY ERIC SEIDMAN
2009-10-05 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Location and Perceptio...
2009-09-22 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Perceived Velocity
2009-09-18 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Whiffing the Pitcher, ...
2009-09-09 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: A Giant Run-Scoring Pr...
2009-09-07 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Pujols and the Simulat...
2009-09-03 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Lidge and the Matter o...
2009-09-02 - Checking the Numbers: Off the Lidge
More...

MORE CHECKING THE NUMBERS
2009-10-05 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Location and Perceptio...
2009-09-22 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Perceived Velocity
2009-09-18 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Whiffing the Pitcher, ...
2009-09-09 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: A Giant Run-Scoring Pr...
2009-09-07 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Pujols and the Simulat...
2009-09-03 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Lidge and the Matter o...
2009-09-02 - Checking the Numbers: Off the Lidge
More...

INCOMING ARTICLE LINKS
2010-09-07 - Checking the Numbers: Freaky Concerns