CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Future Shock: Dream Cr... (07/01)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Prospectus Roundtable:... (06/15)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Prospectus Roundtable:... (08/14)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Transaction of the Day... (07/01)

July 1, 2009

Prospectus Roundtable

Fluke or No Fluke?

by Baseball Prospectus

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.

a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

Matt Meyers, ESPN Insider: Welcome to the latest ESPN Insider Roundtable, and thanks in advance for participating. This week's topic: "Is he for real?" Or, as I like to call it, "how I learned to stop worrying and love Fernando Nieve."

For this exercise, we'll be discussing a few of this season's surprise performers, and I'd like to get your take on whether or not you think they are real or a mirage. Spirited debate is encouraged.

The player I'd like to start with is Red Sox shortstop Nick Green. This guy was a career .240 hitter entering this season (.263 in the minors), and suddenly he's hitting .284, and what's more impressive is that he is slugging 438. We just ran a piece in the magazine that talks about how Green has incorporated a toe-tap into his swing that he picked up from working with Chipper Jones. I normally don't read too much into that sort of thing, but that same toe-tap is what turned Mark DeRosa (the original Nick Green) into a viable big-leaguer. So I ask, Nick Green, is he for real?

Buster Olney: Green may not be a .290 kind of hitter, but guys, I'd say he's not a fluke: he's a decent player who is taking advantage of his surroundings. He is playing as part of a deep lineup, in Fenway Park, and hitting .310 at home. One scout mentioned this week that Fenway has a knack for making average hitters into above-average hitters. He has always been able to hit a high fastball, and he's playing in a park where there's some payoff for that (12 extra-base hits in 87 at-bats).

John Perrotto: Green has always been a guy with some tools, decent pop, and a strong arm, so I don't think it's totally unexpected that he has put together a pretty good stretch for the Red Sox. He was always the kind of guy who was awfully hard on himself, and perhaps now that he is getting older he has learned to relax. Like Buster said, he is in the right ballpark with the right lineup to succeed. He is a one-year wonder? Perhaps. At the very least, he is a viable major league player.

Jay Jaffe: Coming into the year, Green had done nothing to distinguish himself from among dozens of Quadruple-A futility infielder types. He was a 30-year-old who owned a career line of .240/.309/.347 in nearly 800 PA, he'd gotten just seven at-bats in the majors since 2006, and his 2008 minor league numbers at Scranton were horrible, with a .191 EqA. On that basis alone, for him to be where he is right now is a total fluke.

Which isn't to say he hasn't learned a trick or two (the Chipper Jones tip) or gotten some breaks in his favor (a starting job in a great hitters' park? Yes, please!), but I'm not terribly optimistic it can continue. Would you be, if you were Theo Epstein or Terry Francona?

Green's numbers look to be the product of Fenway, where he's hitting .310/.348/.517 in 92 PA, compared to .256/.326/.354 in 92 PA on the road, which is the Nick Green we know and love. His overall line is being driven by a .344 batting average on balls in play, and his batted-ball types say he should be around .290. That 5-to-1 strikeout-to-walk ratio doesn't suggest he's got the control of the strike zone for all of this to continue, and that pitchers will figure out how to exploit him.

Matt Meyers: Some dissension, I like it! But even conceding some "realness" to Green's performance, wouldn't it be foolish for the Red Sox to have any faith in him beyond this year? Didn't we just see this last year with Mike Aviles? I am not sure Jed Lowrie is any sort of long-term answer, so the Sox might actually have a hole at short. Is there a world in which Green is more than just a stopgap for them?

Jay Jaffe: In the context of Lowrie's slated return in July, Green's a perfectly suitable stopgap. I just don't think the Sox should let themselves get overly attached to the guy based on a park-driven 92 PA sample that's well out of context of the other ~900 PA for his career.

Kevin Goldstein: Mike Aviles is a really good comp on a performance level. I'm all for toe-tapping your way to greatness and all that, but this guy has never been anything more than a grinder who can play of the middle and have decent power for the position. He hit .233/.285/.373 last year at Triple-A; toe taps don't turn that guy into a good big leaguer when he's almost 30. I think this is lightning in a bottle, nothing more, not that I wouldn't want to have him around as a utility guy.

John Perrotto: I certainly don't think Nick Green is the Red Sox's starting shortstop on Opening Day in 2010, and I certainly don't think he's the starting shortstop when Jed Lowrie comes back. However, he's proven to be a good fill-in and I think he has reached the point where he is certainly in the major leagues to stay as a utility man.

Buster Olney: If Green were my only shortstop, I'd be fretting. But they've got Lowrie coming back, they're still paying Lugo and hoping to get just a little return, and as we know, they've been monitoring the shortstop market. He's pretty good depth for a guy who is essentially a third-stringer in their organization (or at least that was the plan).

Matt Meyers: And while they have made their mistakes (the Lugo contract, for example), I think the Red Sox have earned the benefit of the doubt that they will handle the situation well. As for an organization that might not have the benefit of the doubt, let's move on to our next "is he for real" candidate: Mets righty Fernando Nieve. Yes, he's looked good in starts against three good teams (the Yankees, Rays, and Cardinals), but this guy was killed the last two years in the minors. I guess if you squint you can still see the guy who was well regarded as a prospect a few years ago, and he does throw hard, but this can't be real, right?

Jay Jaffe: I'll let Kevin speak to what he once was as a prospect, and concede that I've only seen him throw a few innings this year. From a numbers perspective, he's not missing a tremendous number of bats (5.6 K/9) and he's gotten outstanding luck in balls in play (.181 BABIP). His FIP based on his strikeout, walk and homer rates is 3.88, which is certainly respectable, though as an extreme fly-baller (with a ~40 percent ground-ball rate) there's no way he'll avoid the long ball forever. Then again, Citi Field is where home runs go to die, so he's not a horrible fit for that park.

What stands out to me the most when I look at his numbers isn't any of the above. It's that he's relying a lot more on his changeup, which he's throwing about 15 percent of the time, compared to about 4-5 percent in years past. We've seen lots of pitchers take big steps forward when they integrate the change effectively with their 90-something heat; that tells me he's really figured something out. I don't expect him to be the second-best pitcher in the Mets' rotation after Santana, but he certainly seems poised to give the Mets some innings and settle in as the fifth starter.

John Perrotto: This guy has always had a pretty good arm, and it seems as though he has figured a few things out this year, primarily that he needs to throw his changeup more often and pitch inside with greater frequency. That being said, I'm not about to project him as a 15-game winner, but he certainly has the ability to be a solid No. 4 or No. 5 starter. I will make this prediction: Nieve will end up having a better season than Oliver Perez-just what was Omar Minaya thinking when he re-signed Perez for three years and $36 million in a buyers' market?-when all is said and done.

Kevin Goldstein: Nieve has always been a live arm, but it's important to note that his performance never really went downhill until he was moved to the bullpen. On some levels (smallish guy who throws with some effort) it made sense, but as a guy who never really had an effective breaking ball, it really hurt him. He seems to be more effective with his changeup these days, but more importantly, he came up with a second fastball, more of a cutter than anything else, which gives hitters a bit of a different look, as the four-seamer is awfully straight. I'm with the mob here, and I could see him lasting another five or six years as a fourth or fifth starter.

Matt Meyers: Wow. For Nieve's sake, I hope his agent is an Insider subscriber. Moving on: Ben Zobrist. Seriously, what gives here? The guy is third in MLB in OPS. He profiled as a decent utilityman, and suddenly he's one of the most potent bats in the league.

Buster Olney: He reminds me a little bit of Mark DeRosa in how he's improved-look at the pitches per plate appearance, the improved on-base percentage, the ability to put himself into better counts. I remember seeing him play in an Opening Day game a few years ago, and it looked like you could knock the bat out of his hands. Now he looks much stronger, in person-an angular strength-and he controls the at-bats in a way that he didn't a few years ago.

Jay Jaffe: In a more cynical time-as if some people have really left that cynicism behind-somebody would be asking what Zobrist is taking. In his first four years of pro ball (2004-07), he'd never topped eight homers, though he hit for average and collected enough doubles to reach the high .400s in slugging a few times. Still, the prospect reports were damning in this department; in BP2K7 we noted, "He doesn't have much power to speak of... ." He had a breakthrough last year, hitting .253/.339/.505 with 10 homers in 227 PA, and now he's second in the AL with a a .622 slugging percentage, and tied with Evan Longoria for the second-most homers on the Rays.

In 2006-07, when he hit a horrendous .200/.234 /.275 in about 300 PA, 12 percent of his fly balls were infield popups. Now that number's down below four percent. Meanwhile, his HR/FB rate has gone from four percent in those first two years to above 20 percent since, including 24.2 percent this year, the second-highest mark in the league behind Jim Thome. It's a nice run that's done great things to help the Rays, but even with the advances in his approach that Buster noted, it seemingly came from nowhere, and I don't believe he'll sustain the .404 OBP or the high slugging percentage for very long.

John Perrotto: There is no way in the world that Ben Zobrist is going to be among the AL OPS leaders when the season ends. That being said, I do think that he isn't a complete fluke. Zobrist has always had solid tools across the board and won high marks for his intelligence and baseball aptitude. He has started to figure out what he is capable of doing in the major leagues, and his confidence has grown with that. Zobrist was a smaller kid growing up, and had to learn to more of a slap hitter. He has just figured in recent years that it is OK for a fully-grown 6-foot-3 man to turn on some balls. Any manager would love to have this guy because he brings so much to the table, including his ability to play all over the field. I know Joe Maddon adores the guy he calls the "Zo-rilla."

Kevin Goldstein: I'm a mild believer here. The guy always walked a ton in the minors, and it took him some time to bring that kind of approach to the big leagues-that kind of thing happens quite a bit. The power might be a bit fluky, but the guy blasted 12 home runs in last then 200 ABs last year. There's definitely something real here, just not this real.

A version of this story originally appeared on ESPN Insider Insider.

28 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links


Wow. Analysis from Buster Olney. Was Joe Morgan not available?

Jul 01, 2009 10:25 AM
rating: 5

...or Steve Phillips?

Jul 01, 2009 10:37 AM
rating: 4

I like the different perspectives...I'd love to see other "mainstream" analysts team up and do articles with the BP guys. The comparisons/contrasts are pretty interesting.

Jul 01, 2009 10:56 AM
rating: 4
Matt Kory

I have to respectfully disagree, Ameer. It isn't hard to find 'mainstream' analysis; fortunately this isn't one of the places that offers it. I come to BP to hear intelligent analysis, and yes, I believe the two are different.

I appreciate the content, don't get me wrong, but I'd rather read media criticism from BP than hear Buster Olney say stupid things like this: One scout mentioned this week that Fenway has a knack for making average hitters into above-average hitters. I mean, really, what is that? 'I talked to a guy who said something that I didn't fact-check and now I'm parroting it.'

I understand some people will probably say, 'well, just don't read it.' To that, I say I come to BP for quality not quantity.

Jul 01, 2009 11:19 AM
rating: 8

"I appreciate the content, don't get me wrong, but I'd rather read media criticism from BP than hear Buster Olney say stupid things like this: One scout mentioned this week that Fenway has a knack for making average hitters into above-average hitters."

Well yanno... He can hit high fastballs. And one analyst once told me that there's some payoff for that. Provided you play in Fenway park, of course.

Honestly, this is such garbage. It's at the point where half the things I read on here are of the "why should I believe anything you say" variety? Pitch F/x exists. Show me that hitters that are apt at hitting high fastballs are rewarded better at Fenway than they are elsewhere.

"Well, he ties his cleats with a double knot. And on Tuesdays, this is a huge benefit playing in night games. Trust Me. I'm Buster F-ing Olney."

Jul 01, 2009 11:39 AM
rating: 7
Richard Bergstrom
Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway.

Aw, don't diss my favorite agreeable sock puppet. He's kinda cute in a Pets.com way...

Jul 01, 2009 12:36 PM
rating: -5

I'm with Kevin on Zobrist. He's probably getting a little bit lucky with a 23.9 HR/FB% (although last year he posted 17.4% so it isn't _that_ big an outlier) and the absurdly low 1.5% Infield Fly Ball percentage, but the rest of it seems very reasonable. His BABIP is in line with his LD%, his walk rate is right in line with his AAA numbers for the last 3 years, and he's in his prime (28 this past May) so the power spike isn't that crazy. He's not really a SS, but he's a very good 2B or Super Utility guy and should be for the next couple of years even if he ends up as 'only' an .850 OPS instead of 1.033.

Jul 01, 2009 10:56 AM
rating: 3
Dr. Dave

I'm surprised that Nick Green's Chipper-induced toe tap got so many words, but not a peep about all of the work that Ben Zobrist put in with swing mechanics consultant Jaime Cevallos over the offseason. My understanding was that Cevallos pretty much rebuilt Zorilla's swing.

(How is Drew Sutton doing in the Reds' organization this year? He was also a Cevallos student, IIRC...)

Jul 01, 2009 10:57 AM
rating: 2

I'm at the end of my rope with these espn articles. I want to quit you, BP, but I just can't...

Jul 01, 2009 11:28 AM
rating: 6

I love this. People here may not be Buster's biggest fan, but he's an important voice of baseball analysis out there today. Much better to ackowledge him than to pretend he doesn't exist. I'd love to see articles incorporating other baseball voices, from around the spectrum.

It'll be pretty funny when someday, BP throws all this back in my face by giving Joe Morgan a column.

Jul 01, 2009 12:01 PM
rating: 1

...I meant to add: Although, as much as we like to denigrate him, Morgan is actually good at a few things, like defensive alignments, pitch selection, baserunning, other minutiae of the game. If he's given the proper platform--and he isn't at ESPN--he's not such an idiot, and I wouldn't be opposed to seeing his voice on BP.

Jul 01, 2009 13:10 PM
rating: 0
Matt Kory

Actually, he's a tremendous idiot, and a massive blowhard. He's insufferable, and I'd cancel my subscription if he was ever published here, not that he'd ever be.

Jul 01, 2009 13:13 PM
rating: 1
Richard Bergstrom

There was an interview with him published here, as I recall.

Joe says a lot of weird/bad things but every so often he does have a really good insight... just hard to withstand the interim fire-and-brimstone noise.

Jul 01, 2009 14:13 PM
rating: 2
Matt Kory

A broken clock is correct twice a day.

Jul 01, 2009 14:15 PM
rating: 2

I don't think Zobrist, as big a surprise as he's been, is even the best guy on the Rays to be asking this question about. Jason Bartlett, anyone?

Jul 01, 2009 12:08 PM
rating: 2

I would like to see a special tag on the home page title of all ESPN articles similar to the F for fantasy. This way I could choose not to read them beforehand, instead of realizing as I scroll down, ... oh this is one of those crappy espn articles... They really are extremely watered down/simplified versions of what I come here to read and I get very little value from them.

Jul 01, 2009 12:09 PM
rating: 4

In all seriousness, this seems to mark another step in the decline of a once-fantastic website. It seems to be increasingly populated with content widely available elsewhere (the rightly-derided ESPN cross-over stuff) from less-than-original thinkers, political polemics from Goldman et al, an increasingly hideous interface (the noisy front-page/banner ads everywhere), and trailing statistical thinking (the folks at Fangraphs have made remarkable strides, and now have better quality stuff available for free).

I realize that this is just sound and fury as I remain a paying subscriber - so for the time being I am voting that it's still a worthwhile cost/benefit trade-off - but for the first time in years I am wondering if I'll bother to renew next time. I feel like the proprietors are taking their customers for granted here ...

Jul 01, 2009 12:34 PM
rating: 0
Matt Kory

"I feel like the proprietors are taking their customers for granted here ...

"I don't like the ESPN content, but I would never say that. I respectfully disagree wholeheartedly.

Jul 01, 2009 12:46 PM
rating: 3
Adam Madison

I fully agree, as I didn't renew my BP subscription for a good five or six weeks -- in the past it would be instantaneous. I had to think long and hard about it.

Jul 01, 2009 19:23 PM
rating: 0
John Carter

FanGraphs has moved way up in the world, but getting Carroll's injury reports, Goldstein's prospect perspectives, Kahrl's transaction quips, and the historical gold from Goldman blows away any other site. Perrotto's scouting quotes is a cool new feature. Sheehan is always a fun read. Laurila's interviews are always interesting if I make time for them. All that for $40? The team tracker is a very nice bonus. The statitical stuff can be useful. They could use some improvement in helping us search for old articles by keywords or subjects, but the archives are at least there. BP Idol has been a hoot. Baseball Prospectus is alive and sucking up my time like a vampire. I don't see how anyone can leave.

Jul 01, 2009 20:35 PM
rating: 4
Richard Bergstrom

Don't forget the kicker of the discount on the BP Annual.

This year I renewed my BP membership and cancelled my ESPN membership and haven't thought twice about that decision. With ESPN, it got to the point that the only person I enjoyed reading was Stark, with an occasional Neyer or Caple thrown in.

Jul 02, 2009 00:13 AM
rating: 1

I chortle every time I read you stathead snobs. BP is a business, trying to survive, and to do that they HAVE to reach out to embrace the masses, most of whom could care less that the Pitch F/x exists and would never concern themselves with what it means. The "masses" LIKE the Joe Morgans and Buster Olneys, because they can understand them. Sure, you can avoid re-newing your BP subscription, and look for some more obscure shirtsleeve newsletter writers that you can have vehement disagreements with, but what for? BP still gives you most of what you want, and if you get a little straw mixed with the strawberries, so what? Your pointless letters trying to prove that you really only read the super stat-head content of BP are somewhat amusing, but ultimately annoying ... kind of like Buster Olney.

Jul 01, 2009 20:37 PM
rating: -3

I know the Cubs are totally worth ignoring this year, but has anyone noticed that Randy Wells has come out of nowhere to post what seems like a neverending string of quality starts as their fifth starter? He's been so good that Sean Marshall has gotten stuck in the 'pen (although Neil Cotts' ineptitude could be blamed for that, as well). Wells, if I recall, seemed to always be that guy in the minors who would strike out a man an inning, but nevertheless walk too many and give up roughly a hit an inning at AAA - not exactly a recipe for success.

Jul 01, 2009 21:51 PM
rating: 0

Just wanted to parrot hotstatrat above. BP is sucking up my time like no other, and I'll be back tomorrow and the year after that. If Buster Olney shows up, it's a mild amusement, a harmless diversion that keeps the Disney overlords happy with carrying BP on their brands. And that's good -- the BP perspective is blowing up in mainstream baseball. Blurring the line between the two means "we" are winning.

Jul 01, 2009 23:52 PM
rating: 3

The BP Perspective is also being softened by mainstream baseball.

One thing BP has started doing recently, that they hadn't been doing before, is citing the trememdous sabremetric work being done outside BP, like at Fangraphs or THT or by Tom Tango. That, combined with integrating into the mainstream, leads to good things.

Let's wait and see where this all leads.

Jul 02, 2009 10:20 AM
rating: 3
Richard Bergstrom

One thing I have noticed is the established BP writers seem to have changed their own styles based on the feedback they've seen us give the finalists in BP Idol, specifically to cite more sources and include more statistical analysis. I think that reflects well on BP.

Jul 04, 2009 10:54 AM
rating: -1

You guys complain about BP catering to ESPN, but you guys are fueling the fire. What are all the comments on ESPN like? Blowhards and comaplainers. Look at all these comments, blowhards and complainers. Coincidence?

Did anyone want to discuss the article? Or bash Morgan, Phillips, and Onley? We get it. firejoemorgan.com even found the act old. Time to retire.

Jul 02, 2009 18:46 PM
rating: 6

Zobrist rebuilt his swing after working with Jaime "the swing mechanic" Cevallos who also worked with Drew Sutton, who just got called up to the Reds. Expect big things from both of those guys. Cevallos claims he's found the secret to the swing.

Jul 04, 2009 19:22 PM
rating: 0
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Future Shock: Dream Cr... (07/01)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Prospectus Roundtable:... (06/15)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Prospectus Roundtable:... (08/14)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Transaction of the Day... (07/01)

The BP Wayback Machine: The Futures Game Vie...
Fantasy Freestyle: How We Got Here
Fantasy Article Deep League Report: Week 13
Premium Article Field Generals: Under Pressure
Premium Article What Scouts Are Saying: July 1, 2015
Premium Article Minor League Update: Games of Tuesday, June ...
Premium Article Notes from the Field: July 1, 2015

Premium Article On the Beat: Run-hunting in Wrigleyville
Premium Article Transaction of the Day: Rebooting the Pirate...
Future Shock: Dream Crushing
Premium Article The Biz Beat: The Hundred Years War

2009-07-22 - Premium Article Transaction Retrospectus
2009-07-16 - Premium Article Second-Half Prescriptions
2009-07-15 - Premium Article Second-Half Prescriptions
2009-07-01 - Premium Article Prospectus Roundtable: Fluke or No Fluke?
2009-06-22 - Premium Article Struggling Superstar
2009-06-16 - Premium Article Player Profile: Raul Ibanez
2009-06-15 - Premium Article Prospectus Roundtable: Windy City Showdown E...

2010-01-25 - Prospectus Roundtable: Analyzing RoboPitcher
2010-01-10 - Prospectus Roundtable: BABIP and Line Drives
2009-08-14 - Premium Article Prospectus Roundtable: The Problem with Youn...
2009-07-01 - Premium Article Prospectus Roundtable: Fluke or No Fluke?
2009-06-15 - Premium Article Prospectus Roundtable: Windy City Showdown E...
2009-06-08 - Premium Article Prospectus Roundtable: Fixing the Mets
2005-02-24 - Premium Article Prospectus Roundtable: Kendry Morales

2009-07-02 - Under The Knife: Tweaks and Updates