<< Previous Article
Future Shock: White So... (02/02)
|
<< Previous Column
Transaction Analysis: ... (01/30)
|
Next Column >>
Transaction Analysis: ... (02/10)
|
Next Article >>
You Could Look It Up: ... (02/03)
|
February 3, 2009
Transaction Analysis
Roster Oddments
by Christina Kahrl
| American League | National League |
Acquired LHP Rich Hill from the Cubs for a PTBNL; designated LHP Brian Burres for assignment. [2/2]
Signed 4C-R Ty Wigginton to a two-year, $6 million deal. [2/3]
Raiding the Cubs' larder after picking Bill Bavasi's pocket last winter seems to be the play in the MacPhail playbook, but it's not a bad one. Even if Hill is damaged goods in terms of where he's at with his fight with Blassitis, and even if there are people in the industry questioning his commitment, we're still talking about a player who's shown electric stuff and the capacity to dominate. There hasn't been a major arm injury to contribute to his setbacks, and the classic "change of scenery" deal might perfectly suit the man, even if it involves coming into the DH league's toughest division. There's not a lot to say as far as what the Orioles can or should expect—Hill's out of options, and even if he's got his head on straight, he's probably going to be too wild to use in any other role but starting. Happily, the Orioles don't have a rotation worthy of the name that might complicate matters, so they can afford to just clear out one slot behind Jeremy Guthrie, schedule out Hill's first couple of months in it, and see how things turn out with some hands-on work with pitching coach Rick Kranitz, a fellow former Cub. There's obvious, tremendous up-side potential here—the Orioles might just have landed their best starting pitcher. They might also have added a guy they'll cut by June. Given their circumstance, however, it's exactly the sort of chance MacPhail should be taking.
<< Previous Article
Future Shock: White So... (02/02)
|
<< Previous Column
Transaction Analysis: ... (01/30)
|
Next Column >>
Transaction Analysis: ... (02/10)
|
Next Article >>
You Could Look It Up: ... (02/03)
|
Christina- Comparing the Lowe and Perez contracts and saying it's only a $2m a year difference is a bit of spin, isn't it?
The Bravos are paying Lowe $15m a year for four years (his age 36-39 seasons)
The Mets are paying Perez $12m a year for three years (his age 27-29 seasons)
Thus, the difference can be more reasonably depicted as $24 for Lowe's age 39 season.
I admit that Perez is "overpaid". but I'd rather get what is likely to be his best three seasons at $12m than the decline of Lowe for $15m (and a year longer contract).