BP Comment Quick Links
| Home | Unfiltered | Articles | Newsletter | Statistics | Fantasy | Events | Radio | Glossary | Search |
![]() |
|
|
|
September 18, 2008 Prospectus Hit and RunThe Underachievers
It lacked the fanfare of a division-clinching victory, or the exuberance of Francisco Rodrigurez's record-setting 58th save, but around the time that the Angels popped the champagne corks last week, they surpassed another record. Roughly two weeks since I pointed out their impending date with history, they inched past the 2004 Yankees' all-time mark of 12.7 wins above their third-order Pythagenpat projection—that is, their projected won-loss record after adjusting for run elements, park, league, and quality of competition. Since then, they've just kept going; through Wednesday, the Halos held a 92-59 record, the best in the major leagues despite their having outscored their opponents by just 63 runs. After adjusting for everything under the sun to get a truer bead on the quality of their offense, the Adjusted Standings show them as 14.2 games above their third-order projection of 77.8-73.2. While it's possible they could backslide a bit before the season ends, right now they have a solid claim as the most overachieving club of all time. Here's the updated all-time top 10: Rnk Year Team W-L Pct R RA AEQR AEQRA D3 Won 1 2008 Angels 92-59 .612 698 635 689 667 14.2 Division + ??? 2 2004 Yankees 101-61 .623 897 808 911 831 12.7 Division 3 1970 Reds 102-60 .630 775 681 757 676 12.6 Pennant 4 2007 D'backs 90-72 .556 712 732 708 739 12.2 Division 5T 1954 Dodgers 92-62 .597 778 740 782 749 12.1 5T 2005 ChiSox 99-63 .611 741 645 740 684 12.1 World Series 7 1905 Tigers 79-74 .516 512 604 524 601 11.9 8T 1924 Dodgers 92-62 .597 717 679 717 684 11.7 8T 2002 Twins 94-67 .584 768 712 759 741 11.7 Division 10 1954 Indians 111-43 .721 746 504 717 511 11.4 Pennant To put the Angels' performance this year into a bit more context, consider that the team with the second-best record in the majors, the Cubs (91-59, half a game behind the Halos), has a raw differential of 184 runs, just shy of three times the Angels' mark. Meanwhile, the team with the most similar third-order projection to the Angels is the Indians, with a projected record of 78.7-73.3. Despite outscoring opponents by 36 runs, their actual record stands at 75-77 at this writing. This bears repeating: the Angels have a record better than the Cubs, but considering their run differential and strength of schedule, they're closer to the Indians in terms of quality. When I covered the Angels and their fellow overachievers in this space a few weeks ago, I promised to follow up with a look at history's great underachievers. There's no team chasing the pot of fool's gold at the other end of the projected record rainbow this year; the most underachieving team is just 7.3 games below their third-order projection, a total that wouldn't crack the bottom 100. More on the identity of that team in a moment; for now here is the list of historical underachievers: Rnk Year Team W-L Pct R RA AEQR AEQRA D3 1 1993 Mets 59-103 .364 672 744 672 736 -15.1 2 1935 Braves 38-115 .248 575 852 593 835 -14.6 3 1986 Pirates 64-98 .395 663 700 666 697 -13.6 4 1946 A's 49-105 .318 529 680 529 662 -12.8 5 1905 Browns 54-99 .353 512 608 521 601 -12.7 6 1937 Reds 56-98 .364 612 706 620 700 -12.4 7 1939 Browns 43-111 .279 733 1035 752 1003 -12.2 8 1962 Mets 40-120 .250 617 948 631 924 -12.1 9 1917 Pirates 51-103 .331 464 595 468 579 -11.9 10T 1984 Pirates 75-87 .463 615 567 612 564 -11.8 10T 1975 Astros 64-97 .398 664 711 668 711 -11.8 12 2001 Rockies 73-89 .451 923 906 910 870 -11.5 13 1993 Padres 61-101 .377 679 772 681 764 -11.4 14T 1961 Phillies 47-107 .305 584 796 599 782 -11.1 14T 1924 Cardinals 65-89 .422 740 750 745 752 -11.1 16T 1967 Orioles 76-85 .472 654 592 657 602 -11.0 16T 1907 Reds 66-87 .431 526 519 527 522 -11.0 18 1936 Phillies 54-100 .351 726 874 739 869 -10.9 19 2006 Indians 78-84 .481 870 782 882 800 -10.7 20T 1912 Dodgers 58-95 .379 651 744 665 742 -10.4 20T 1952 Tigers 50-104 .325 557 738 563 716 -10.4 Topping this ignominious list is the 1993 Mets, a team best remembered for Bobby Bonilla's infamous threat to New York Daily News writer Bob Klapisch: "I'll show you the Bronx!" Klapisch had just co-authored a book about the 1992 Mets—a team that finished 72-90 despite having the majors' top payroll—called The Worst Team Money Could Buy, but the irony is that their successors were so much worse. The 1993 Mets were a 74-win team that somehow found a way to lose an extra 15 games, thus claiming primacy not only on this list, but also setting a record for marginal payroll dollars per marginal win according to a lengthy study by the late, great Doug Pappas. At $3.394 million per marginal win, a record that stood until the 1996 Tigers came along, they richly deserved their sobriquet.
|
The under performing teams won 37.02% of their games. The over performing teams won 60.44% of their games. So far so good.
The under performing teams "should" have won 44.62% of their games. The over performing teams "should" have won 52.66% of their games. Um, anyone else see a problem with this?
There is no reason for their to be covariance between being "lucky" and being good. A team that "should" go 162-0 cannot get lucky and a team that should go 0-162 cannot get unlucky. I am not sure if the effect in baseball is large enough to matter so I would think that the 20 luckiest and 20 unluckiest teams each "should" have won 50% of their games. Maybe the luckiest teams should have won 49.9% of their games and the unluckiest "should" have won 50.1% of their games due to the amount of opportunity for luck.
The covariance suggests that the win 3 rate in not quite what it is cracked up to be. I can think of a variety of reasons why this might be the case but I simply don't have the data to test these theories.