CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article Under The Knife: Windy... (09/04)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Player Profile: Mike G... (06/28)
Next Column >>
Player Profile: Cliff ... (09/11)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Prospectus Today: Look... (09/04)

September 4, 2008

Player Profile

Ryan Ludwick

by Marc Normandin, Eric Seidman, Will Carroll and Kevin Goldstein

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

When you hear Ryan Ludwick's name nowadays, you think about a player who skipped from organization to organization and came seemingly out of nowhere to earn an All-Star appearance this season with the St. Louis Cardinals. What many people forget is that during the early part of the decade, Ludwick was a highly-touted prospect as a center fielder in the Athletics organization, but between a hip injury that threw his minor league career off track and his moving from team to team, he got a bit lost in the mix. Now the question on everyone's mind is whether or not the Ludwick we see today—the one hitting .303/.379/.599 on the season through Tuesday—is something we can expect to see in the future, or if this production is a mirage.

Ryan Andrew Ludwick, brother of former big-league pitcher Eric Ludwick, was drafted by the A's in the second round of the 1999 amateur draft out of UNLV. He fell to the second round because he failed to show the power that was expected out of him during his last year in college ball, but once the A's had him in their system, his power reappeared. Ludwick hit just .275/.348/.444 during his first (partial) post-draft season at High-A Modesto, a nice debut for a 20-year-old with college experience, and during his second year there he built on that by hitting .264/.359/.505 with 29 homers and 58 total extra-base hits.

On the basis of that production, Baseball America rated Ludwick as the third-best prospect in the A's organization heading into the 2001 season, though expectations based on what he could accomplish with more seasoning played a part in that rating. Ludwick had issues with off-speed stuff, due to his limited experience in the pros, and though he was at that time lauded for his defensive skills in center, scouts felt that right field would be his eventual home. Ludwick did not disappoint during his first year at Double-A Midland, hitting .269/.356/.503; though he was not showing the batting average people expected based on his college numbers, he had plenty of power, with 25 homers and 51 extra-base hits this time around. Ludwick wrapped up the year struggling during a 57 at-bat stint with Triple-A Sacramento.

That would be the end of his career as an Athletic. He was a piece in the deal between the A's and divisional rival Texas Rangers that brought Carlos Pena and Mike Venafro to Oakland, while Ludwick, Gerald Laird, Jason Hart, and Mario Ramos all ended up in the Lone Star state. Baseball America initially rated him the fifth-best prospect in the Ranger organization, but made sure to mention that Ludwick had been slow to make adjustments. That wasn't an issue opening the year in the high-offense PCL, where Ludwick would hit .285/.370/.548, but that success wouldn't translate to the majors, as he hit a poor .235/.295/.346 while striking out nearly 30 percent of the time. His season would end early when a stress fracture in his left hip needed to be treated.

Though Ludwick was then rated the seventh-best prospect in the Rangers organization, Baseball America had plenty of words of caution: he had holes in his swing, didn't use his lower half to generate power, and he needed to work on his two-strike approach. His injury raised questions about whether or not he would be able to fix those issues, or if he was a lost cause; as Baseball Prospectus 2003 put it, "Now the guy who looked like a fair bet to solve the Rangers’ long-standing center field problem may never be heard from again. Or he could be OK. This kind of injury is unusual enough that no one will have much idea until spring." Ludwick would come back, would eventually be traded to the Indians after a solid showing in Triple-A again, and he would hit .265/.306/.485; he obviously needed to work on his plate discipline still, but he had shown some quality power despite the low batting average.

This is where the issues began to set in for Ludwick: between the hip injury and a knee injury he battled for most of the 2004 season, he lost much of the time he should have spent refining his game in Triple-A or working on sticking in the majors. Instead, he tried to stay healthy, and produced poorly when he did make it to the majors for brief stints. In 2004 and 2005 combined, Ludwick had 91 big-league at-bats, and then would spend the entirety of the 2006 campaign playing for Triple-A Toledo at age 27. The .266/.342/.506 line that was impressive back at the beginning of the decade was far from it now, given Ludwick's advancing age for a prospect. Baseball Prospectus 2007 felt that Ludwick's season had gone well, but that he was slated to be a fourth outfielder with some pop in the majors.

Let go by the Tigers, Ludwick was invited to spring training by the Cardinals for the 2007 campaign. Though he didn't make the team out of camp, a .340/.380/.642 showing at Memphis—the kind of thing you can expect from a 28-year-old in the high minors—earned him a spot on the team when Preston Wilson went on the DL. Though his production dropped significantly after his promotion, he had a generally solid campaign, hitting .267/.339/.479 for the Cards with an EqA that was a tick above both the right and left field averages.

Then came this season, which has been the best of Ludwick's career, and it isn't close. He was projected for a useful .256/.331/.475 weighted mean, and he's instead hitting .303/.379/.599 into September, higher than even his most optimistic PECOTA forecast of .287/.364/.544. Although it looked like Ludwick was falling back to earth in June (.228/.298/.406 in 114 plate appearances) after a blistering first two months of the season, his bat came to life yet again in July, and he's hit .325/.400/.631 since. Part of the reason for this transformation in performance is due to Ludwick's power combined with his lack of ground-balls; his G/F ratio is 0.6, not far off from his career rate of 0.7, but instead of hitting lazy fly balls and popups, Ludwick hits fly balls with authority (20.5 percent of flies have been homers) and he hits tons of liners to boot. His 28 percent liner rate is much higher than what's normal for a big-league hitter, and he leads the league by more than two percentage points among players with 450 plate appearances, roughly the distance between second place (Bobby Abreu) and 14th (Garrett Atkins). Though there are always a few players who reach that level with their line-drive percentages, very rarely do you see the same names dominating the peaks of the list. Since 2005, there have been 12 instances of players with liner rates of 25 percent or more (min. 450 PA), and not one of those has been a player performing the feat a second time.

Based on this, chances are good that we will see Ludwick taper off some next year. The good news for the Cards' outfielder is that his .349 BABIP is below the expectations set by his soaring line-drive percentage, so if we took away a chunk of that to bring him closer to the league average of 20 percent, he would be around a .310-.320 BABIP. Also, those missing liners have to go somewhere, and as a grounder or a fly ball, they are more likely to become outs; this will also take away from his production somewhat in the future. Moving his rate to the 20 percent mark is a compromise between his recent liner-friendly ways and his previous numbers, which tended to hover a bit below average, between 17-18 percent. Between his strikeout rate (26.1 percent this year, 26.4 for his career) and the liner rate that will eventually drop off, we'll most likely see Ludwick's average drop back down next year. That's not the same thing as saying we're going to see the old, league-average hitter again; his 90th percentile PECOTA forecast was already optimistic, and if you adjust his current line for a 30-point drop in BABIP, that puts him back down there. There is certainly nothing wrong with a corner outfielder who can slug well over the .500 mark.—Marc Normandin

Performance Evaluation

Josh Hamilton may hog the media spotlight in the "great story" department this season, but Ludwick deserves his own fair share of it. After issues with injuries kept him a Quad-A player for several years, the Cardinals outfielder is in the midst of a career year. He finds himself among the best in the senior circuit in several offensive categories, even earning his first All-Star bid this year. As Bill James said in a recent roundtable, it's surprising Ludwick even had a starting job this year, let alone an All-Star berth.

How has he done it? Well, while we might expect a righty to perform better against the opposite-handed lefties, Ludwick has actually hit like-handed righties much better, repeating something he did last season. Against southpaws, he has put together a .264/.351/.556 line, nothing at all to feel bad about, but against righties—and why doesn't anyone ever call them northpaws?—he's hit .324/.395/.621, in just about twice the amount of plate appearances. What gives?

vs. RHP: 344 PA, .321/.392/.616, 1008 OPS
vs. LHP: 181 PA, .266/.350/.565, 915 OPS

Ludwick has seen an equal amount of fastballs from both lefties and righties, but there are significant discrepancies in his rates of off-speed pitches seen. Lefties favor changeups as their secondary pitch, with the rate sums of curveballs and sliders falling short of the cambios. Righties are much more prone to throw sliders as their chief secondary option, limiting their curveballs and changeups. Despite the discrepancies, it appears that Ludwick, like most power hitters, loves pitches middle or middle-in. Based on the amount of called strikes, swinging strikes, and fouls in this area, he seems to struggle most with pitches down or down-and-away.

Fastballs from lefties have been put in play the most, with changeups from righties finding their way to the field off of Ludwick's bat the least. He has handled fastballs quite well, and happily (from his perspective) he sees them very often. It will be very interesting to see what happens if/when pitchers begin to mix their offerings a bit more. We do not really have an extremely large sample to say that a pitch here or there will benefit or hurt Ludwick, but the patterns this year seem to follow those of most other power hitters: stay away from pitching him down the middle or middle-in, and attack the down-and-away zone with off-speed pitches.—Eric Seidman

Health Report

Ludwick could always hit; he just couldn't stay healthy earlier in his career. While the Cardinals deserve some credit for taking a chance on him and recognizing that he was a MLB-caliber hitter, several other teams took the same shot and came away with a lost season. Ludwick's history includes a fractured hip, right knee surgery, and a litany of muscle strains, usually in the legs; simply put, Ludwick was an injury-prone player with upside. Since 2005, when Ludwick lost much of the season to a fractured wrist, he's been relatively healthy. By the time the Tigers took a chance on him in 2006, he was finally ready at 27, the prime of his career, and he spent much of 2006 coming back from that wrist injury, rediscovering his former power and adjusting his swing. What the Cardinals recognized is that the worst of Ludwick's injury history was past.

What you'll notice is that all of his injuries (save for the muscular ones) are traumatic. Absent a trauma or some reason that he was having these kinds of traumatic injuries time and again, the way you'll see with so-called "all-out" players, there's the chance that he could stay healthy. It's like crossing a road with light traffic: you're likely to be able to walk across without getting hit most days, but it only takes one car at the right time to ruin your whole year.

The Cardinals have Sig Mejdal, one of the top injury analysts in the game, in their front office, and theirs is precisely the type of team that can understand and adjust for this kind of risk. Ludwick was brought in with an opportunity to show that he could stay healthy at Triple-A and hit his way up to the big club, which is exactly what he did. The idea that Ludwick is still injury-prone is open to debate. Yes, he'll be more risky as he ages and as he's more exposed by full-time play, but again, it appears that early in his career, Ludwick's luck worked against him more than his body. On a health level, there's no reason to think he can't do it again, at least for one more season.—Will Carroll

Scouting Report

Ludwick's phenomenal season has generated plenty of attention, and with good reason. Unfortunately, plenty of time has been wasted trying to figure out where other teams failed in their evaluation of him, or in looking for patterns in the sand in order to follow and find "the next Ryan Ludwick." However, Ludwick is not proof that there are a number of players putting up big numbers at Triple-A who could do the same in the big leagues, he's simply proof that players are capable of late-career adjustments, and that sometimes, consistent health and therefore playing time is what a player needs to achieve his potential.

There's one thing about Ludwick that I always remember—the potential was always there, and that is one thing that separates him from most Triple-A mashers. Ludwick was a second-round pick in 1999, and that's only because he had a disappointing junior year at UNLV; he entered the spring as arguably the top power prospect in college baseball. So scouts saw star potential in him a decade ago, and it just took time (and health) to develop. The other difference between Ludwick and your standard Quad-A masher is athleticism. He's hardly a one-dimensional slugger, because Ludwick has always been a well-toned athlete who even had above-average speed early in his career. Those are certainly two building blocks for stardom, but finding every guy in Triple-A two years ago with those things going for them will still only result in one Ryan Ludwick. These things happen, and not being able to predict them is not a cop-out, it's a matter of admitting that there are tons of factors in a player's development that no amount of study can define.—Kevin Goldstein

Eric Seidman is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Eric's other articles. You can contact Eric by clicking here
Kevin Goldstein is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Kevin's other articles. You can contact Kevin by clicking here

Related Content:  Ryan Ludwick,  The Who,  Triple-A,  Time,  Year Of The Injury,  Quad-a

21 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

ephinz

Nice feature. I was asked the same thing by Jeff Erickson on Fantasy Focus. With high Ks and mediocre walks, I wonder if a breakout 30-year-old will continue to produce at the same level next year.

Is there anything to the meme floating around baseball punditry that ball players will age like 30+ years-old again as opposed to the fountain of youth that had existed, coincidentally, during the '90s and first half of the first decade of the 21st century?

Sep 04, 2008 11:21 AM
rating: 0
 
rogeranderson

I'd like to hear more about the "meme" around the steroid impact on performance by age during the late 90's, 2000. I have asked this question several times and have never seen a response. Seems like this wouldn't be too hard to quantify with all the data available and incredibly talented people at BP.

I would expect to see a graph where peak performance years rises throughout the late 90's and 2000, and then begins to drop down 2004 or so. Please?

Sep 05, 2008 09:50 AM
rating: 0
 
BillJohnson

You wonder if batting behind (or right in front of) Albert Pujols has anything to do with Lud's emergence this year. I am reminded of Matt Williams, who was a pretty good player before Barry Bonds joined him on the Giants, a VERY good player while paired with Bonds, and back to "pretty good" once they went their separate ways. Of course there is the difference that Bonds' 1993 arrival coincided with Williams' age-27 season, while Ludwick is 3 years older, but still.

Sep 04, 2008 11:34 AM
rating: 1
 
Brian Oakchunas

Would love to see a study on how much difference it makes when a good hitter is in front of/behind you.

Sep 04, 2008 18:28 PM
rating: 0
 
digmyearth

Big thumps up to the tag team article. Well done BP.

Sep 04, 2008 12:47 PM
rating: 0
 
buffum
(458)

Agreed, this sort of "multiple camera angles" collaboration is a real treat.

Sep 04, 2008 12:50 PM
rating: 0
 
mars2001

Great article.

If there is a pattern to be found, maybe it's that St. Louis's medical department should be paired with Oakland's scouting department (at least for OFs). An interesting test case would be for the Cardinals to acquire Javier Herrera & Travis Buck...

Sep 04, 2008 12:54 PM
rating: 0
 
bdoublegeez

Eric Seidman doesn't get a byline?

Sep 04, 2008 13:55 PM
rating: 0
 
bdoublegeez

A thousand apologies for the double-post. I'm head over heels for this type of player profile. Excellent work.

May I suggest Derrek Lee be profiled? It seems like his groundball rate is twice what it was last year. Where did the power go? Could it be that he hasn't returned to level from his wrist injury? Or is this the Derrek Lee that Chicago forgot about after the events of 2005? Or is he simply declining somewhat as he sniffs his mid-thirties?

Sep 04, 2008 14:04 PM
rating: 0
 
Eric Seidman

No :-(

Sep 04, 2008 14:29 PM
rating: 0
 
Jamey
(208)

I'll add to the accolades here. I'm a life time Cardinals fan and I've been wondering how much to expect from Ludwick going forward. I learned a lot about Ludwick that I didn't know.

Sep 04, 2008 14:37 PM
rating: 0
 
Eric Seidman

mars2001, the fusion of St. Louis medical with Oakland scouting would be... well, it would be like a mega-front office!

Derrek Lee is an interesting case, bdoublegeez... from 2005-2007, his LD/GB/FB were virtually identical, but his decline in power had to do with a gradual dropoff in HR/FB... 24% in 05, 15% in 06, 13% last year.

Then, this year, it is down to 11.8%, yet his FB% has dropped from 38% to 33%; he's hitting less home runs per fly ball, and hitting a much lower percentage of flyballs, a combo that can't be positive.

His BB rate is the lowest it has been since 2004, but his K-rate is the lowest it has been, well, ever. He is also swinging more than the last few years, increasing his contact on pitches out of the zone, which would explain the dropoff in his walk rate.

I'm not sure where the power went, but it has gone somewhere. He is still effective, but his .824 OPS is lower than Casey Blake and equal to Cody Ross, two players you'll likely never hear mentioned alongside Lee.

Sep 04, 2008 14:41 PM
rating: 1
 
leez34

Why aren't there more of these? I think a weekly feature is in order!

Sep 04, 2008 15:05 PM
rating: 0
 
mswain784

I second.

Sep 04, 2008 16:57 PM
rating: 0
 
Eric Seidman

Ohh, just you wait fellers...

Sep 04, 2008 17:32 PM
rating: 0
 
Scott
(296)

This feature simply rocks, folks. The "tag-team" approach results in a lot of different POV, and they combine for a really interesting perspective on a player.

Now, being a Cards fan, and having liked Ludwick a lot before this season, I certainly was predisposed to like this effort. But it went well beyond what I would have expected. This is a really top-notch way to get to know things about a player that you a) thought you might have heard once before, b) had heard but not really digested, and c) just plain didn't know.

Please sirs, may we have some more?

Sep 04, 2008 18:28 PM
rating: 0
 
akcolonial

May I suggest, the up and down career Pat "The Bat" Burrell? Especially his solid year at the end of a long contract.

Sep 04, 2008 22:39 PM
rating: 0
 
Eric Seidman

Alexei, it actually hasn't been up and down. He has been extremely solid from 2004-2008, and had good years prior to 2002. His 2002 season was terrible, though, and his 2003 was injury-plagued. He doesn't hit for a high batting average, but look at his slash line and OPS from 2004-2007 and this year as well, and tell me it isn't consistent.

Sep 05, 2008 11:28 AM
rating: 0
 
Eric Seidman

Oops, off by one year. His 2000-2002 was very solid, as are his 2005-2008. In 2003 he stunk, plain and simple. In 2004, he was muc better than 2003, but injuries played a big part in keeping his numbers down.

Sep 05, 2008 11:31 AM
rating: 0
 
Brian Cartwright

"the kind of thing you can expect from a 28-year-old in the high minors"

I would think that an MLE is an MLE, regardless of the age. How many times does an over age player put up a 340/380/602 line is the high minors?

The difference between 24 and 28 in AAA is that the 24 year old is expected to get better next year, while the 28 year old is at or past his peak, and can reasonably be expected to decline.

All 24 year olds in AAA in my database (not yet complete) hit 292/362/469, while 28 year olds in AAA hit 283/352/452. Not a great difference in performance, and most of it is upward attrition bias, as the better players are promoted before reaching 28.

Without age adjustment, I'll project Ludwick right now at 270/333/512

Sep 11, 2008 17:46 PM
rating: 0
 
eusital

Would Somebody like Nelson Cruz (27 year old, athletic, good numbers at AAA) qualify as a "next Ryan Ludwick" type?

Oct 09, 2008 10:18 AM
rating: 0
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article Under The Knife: Windy... (09/04)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Player Profile: Mike G... (06/28)
Next Column >>
Player Profile: Cliff ... (09/11)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Prospectus Today: Look... (09/04)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Fantasy Article Closer Report: Fifth Edition, 2015
Expert FAAB Review: Week Four
Premium Article Minor League Update: Games of Monday, April ...
Premium Article The Call-Up: A.J. Cole
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: Hamilton Returns
Premium Article Baseball Therapy: Death of the Renaissance M...
Premium Article Prospect Debate: Greg Bird: Patient or Passi...

MORE FROM SEPTEMBER 4, 2008
Premium Article Prospectus Preview: Thursday's Games to Watc...
Premium Article Prospectus Today: Looking for an Advantage
Premium Article Under The Knife: Windy City Panic Attack

MORE BY MARC NORMANDIN
2008-09-27 - Premium Article Player Profile: Ricky Nolasco
2008-09-08 - Premium Article Under The Knife: Bunches, and a Brady?
2008-09-05 - UTK Wrap: September Song
2008-09-04 - Premium Article Player Profile: Ryan Ludwick
2008-09-04 - Premium Article Under The Knife: Windy City Panic Attack
2008-08-31 - Premium Article Prospectus Preview: Sunday's Games to Watch
2008-08-27 - Fantasy Beat: Rookie Contributions
More...

MORE PLAYER PROFILE
2008-09-27 - Premium Article Player Profile: Ricky Nolasco
2008-09-23 - Premium Article Player Profile: Ryan Howard
2008-09-11 - Player Profile: Cliff Lee
2008-09-04 - Premium Article Player Profile: Ryan Ludwick
2008-06-28 - Premium Article Player Profile: Mike Gonzalez
2008-01-30 - Player Profile: James Shields
2008-01-09 - Premium Article Player Profile: Corey Patterson
More...

INCOMING ARTICLE LINKS
2008-09-11 - Player Profile: Cliff Lee