Notice: Trying to get property 'display_name' of non-object in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/generators/schema/article.php on line 52
keyboard_arrow_uptop

With last night’s 5-4 loss to the Blue Jays, the Twins fell out of a first-place tie with the White Sox in the AL Central, leaving them a game behind with 24 to play. That one-game edge doesn’t seem like much, but when you look at the various playoff predictors, you see that the systems don’t give the Twins much chance to make it up, and virtually no chance to catch the Red Sox for the AL wild-card slot.


                     Division   Wild Card
Playoff Odds           32.0%       0.6%
PECOTA Playoff Odds    32.1%       0.5%
ELO Playoff Odds       51.9%       1.2%

Why does a one-game edge with about three weeks left translate to a nearly 2:1 advantage for the White Sox in two of the three methodologies? Well, for one thing, the White Sox have been the better team to date. Their 78-61 record is an accurate reflection of their performance in 2008; the Adjusted Standings show that their third-order record, factoring in run differential, underlying performance, and opposition, is 77-62-just one game off-largely because they’ve allowed about 13 fewer runs that expected.

The Twins, on the other hand, have a third-order record of 71-68, a mark that places them behind the Indians within their own division. The Twins have a whopping +70 run differential, in line with their actual record, but that differential is almost entirely driven by the fantastic job they’ve done hitting with runners in scoring position. Based on their statistics, the Twins project to have scored 646 runs; they’re 61 runs ahead of that pace, the biggest positive gap in baseball. A team that has batted .279/.339/.410 overall has jacked that to .311/.386/.456 with runners in scoring position. The improvement shows across the board: a higher BABIP, higher isolated power, and higher unintentional walk rate.

Most research has shown that hitting in the clutch is not a skill, for individuals or for teams, over and above hitting in all situations. So while the runs and the wins created by the Twins’ performance with runners in scoring position have been banked, the most likely scenario for the last 24 games is that the Twins will hit with RISP what they hit as a whole, and therefore play more like a .500 team, rather than a .550 one. Last year’s team, with largely the same personnel, hit .276/.347/.412 with runners in scoring position, a slight improvement on its .264/.330/.391 performance overall. Despite the persistent idea that the Twins have a skill in this area, the most likely reason for the split is variance.

The White Sox have no such statistical gremlins in their record-they are what we think they are. The success that the fly-ball tossing starting rotation had suppressing home runs in the season’s first two months has largely corrected itself. After allowing 33 long balls in April and May combined, the Sox gave up 35, 30, and 27 in the next three months. This was expected, but again, the wins banked by the results early on are theirs to keep, like the first-level prize on a game show. Offensively, the White Sox have improved on last year’s disastrous, and no doubt anomalous, performance on balls in play, with a middle of the pack batting average (.265) and excellent power: second in the AL in slugging, first in homers and isolated power. Just as was the case with the Ozzieball team of ’05, there’s no actual sheen of smallball here, either; the Sox are 13th in the AL in steals and have laid down just 23 sac bunts all year long.

I originally thought that the schedules might be the issue, but if anything, the Twins have it easier down the stretch. Just looking at the series that the teams don’t have in common or the one against each other, the Sox play the Angels, Jays, and Yankees, while the Twins get the Orioles, Rays, and Royals. Even if you figure that the Sox playing the Twins calculates as a bit easier than the Twins playing the Sox does, that’s a pretty big edge for the Twins.

The ELO method of calculating the odds, developed by Nate Silver, gives the Twins the best chance of taking the division, and actually makes them a slight favorite. ELO is designed to assess a team’s skill level at a given moment in time, so it may be seeing the Twins as they are at the moment, which is an improved team thanks to the sloughing off of dead weight such as Livan Hernandez, the emergence of Denard Span as an OBP guy, and a healthy Alex Casilla at second base. It may also be catching that the Sox record is still showing vestiges of a hot start driven by the low home-run rate. ELO assigns more weight to recent results, and since the end of April, both teams have identical 64-48 marks.

I tend to think ELO has it right here, not for the reasons stated above, but for this one: team performance over 24 games is largely unpredictable. The error bars on any projection for either teams’ performance down the stretch swallow up any pretense of knowing what will happen, and when you consider the three head-to-head games in there, the only conclusion that can be reached is that this is a toss-up. That the White Sox have been the better team informs the discussion, but everything we know about baseball shows us that being the better team matters less in direct proportion to the number of games we want to evaluate. The White Sox could go anything from 17-7 to 10-14 over the next few weeks, and the Twins, from 16-8 through 9-15. I’m not smart enough to pick two records from those pools and tell you who will win the Central. I can say that these look to be the key factors:

  • Bullpens: Both teams have struggled to get quality relief innings outside of their closer. This is unusual for both managers, who have had a lot of success assembling no-name, low-cost bullpens over the years. The division could be decided by which set of relievers goes 2007 Phillies on the league.
  • Top two spots: Neither team has gotten enough men on base in front of its power core. This is critical for any team, but especially so for the Twins, who get so much of their offense from Joe Mauer and Justin Morneau. Give the Twins, who have locked Span and Casilla into the top spots since Casilla’s return, giving them an edge here. Their lineup is as functional now as it has been all season long.
  • Defense: Both below-average squads, the Twins have had one of their worst defensive seasons in some time this year. Jay Jaffe pegged them as the second-worst defensive team in the AL a few weeks ago. The combination of a low-strikeout staff-even with Francisco Liriano replacing Hernandez-and a mediocre defense can be a deadly one. The Twins have to do a better job turning balls in play into outs down the stretch in back of their rotation, or they’ll give up too many runs to make it work.

Regardless of how this turns out, it’s going to be a great ride. Credit both of these organizations-mostly picked third and fourth in the division-for assembling teams that could step into the void created by the failures of the Tigers and Indians and contend. The White Sox, and specifically Kenny Williams, continue to defy expectations, while the Twins are seeing the fruits of a development system that churns out pitchers like the Valley pumps out porn.

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
ssimon
9/04
Substitute \"pitcher strikeouts\" for \"top two spots\" in those deciding factors, and you get the Secret Sauce formula. If we consider these last 23 games to be an extra-long playoff series, it\'s not surprising those factors would matter the most.
newsense
9/04
and 162 games is an EXTRA EXTRA long playoff series.

secret sauce isn\'t about the length of the series - it\'s about the quality of the two teams playing each other. When the teams are good, the Secret sauvce items matter more because good teams tend to neutralize other routes to winning.
sbnirish77
9/04
The problem is that the entire playoff probablitiy odds calculation is more dependant upon past performance than indicative of future results.

There were probality greater odds of Armageddon occuring than what than what the Rockies did last year according to this calculator.
llewdor
9/04
That doesn\'t mean the calculator\'s wrong. That just means the Rockies did something unexpected. That happens.

That\'s how statistics work.
bsolow
9/05
Can you think of a better way to project what will happen over the immediate future than what has happened over the recent past? Assuming that a team\'s performance over the first 140-ish games of the season is a reasonable estimate of the team\'s talent level, that\'s probably the best way to estimate how the team will perform over the last 20-ish games. In statistical terms, I\'d guess that the BP guys have an unbiased and consistent estimator of playoff probabilities.

Unless there\'s evidence that the playoff odds report has a bias towards a certain type of team, saying that the Rockies did something historically unique (according to BP\'s model) isn\'t an indictment of the model. The fact that it was such an incredible comeback indicates that the model is probably doing a pretty good job.

The only counterargument to using past results to project future results would be that the BP models might not account for changes in personnel that have changed the true talent level of the team. One, It seems to me that Joe is suggesting that the ELO model already accounts for that, and two, I don\'t think either of these teams has had a change in personnel sufficient to make a huge difference in their talent level in a recent enough timeframe for the models to ignore it completely.
Richie
9/04
Is ELO just a theory, or has it been results-tested? E.g., going back to (say) the last 30 Labor Days, has ELO predicted the outcome of pennant races better than the other 2 systems?
wcarroll
9/04
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=5271
mafrth77
9/05
I still think the white Sox take it, The Twins have been singles lucky all year, on offense and defense. 23 games is a long time to stay lucky.
jsheehan
9/05
So is 139.

The Twins\' record is probably a bit better than they\'ve played, whereas the Sox\' isn\'t. It really doesn\'t matter at this point, because whatever we know about the teams, there\'s just not any real reliable way to look at two relatively even teams--and in baseball terms, these teams are relatively even--and discern which will have the better record over 23 games. Variance, luck, randomness...choose your term, but it swamps whatever prediction you can make about these teams.

If you\'re a BBRAA guy, you\'ll write that the team that \"wanted it more\" or something won; me, I just acknowledge that they\'re both good baseball teams, and one is likely going to play better than the other over three weeks--probably a mix of performance and \"luck\"--and standing here, point to some factors that may be critical.

I wouldn\'t call 23 games an \"extra-long playoff series,\" but there\'s an underlying point there: the fewer games, the less reliable our models...and to some extent, the more fun it is to watch.


wick98
9/05
Yay, the Twins in a Sheehan article!

I\'m glad to hear that better minds than mine are pegging the Twins at even chances to take the division. As a life long fan, they\'ve been very exciting to watch this year, what with defying expectations and all, but the BP reader in me has had the \"ridiculous stats for RISP\" hanging over my head raining on my parade all year. I fully expect them to totally tank with RISP this month. But who knows?