Notice: Trying to get property 'display_name' of non-object in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/generators/schema/article.php on line 52
keyboard_arrow_uptop

Olympic Prospectus series

A look ahead at the rest of the qualifying round for the US team and some
wild predictions for the medal round, along with some reader email and a
merchandise update.

Friday, September 22, Italy

Italy will be losing. Rick Krivda, mop-up starter, was likely to
take this one, but he won’t (see below), and as a result Italy will be
facing one of Team USA’s young, gas-throwing phenoms, probably Ben
Sheets
, and be reduced to leaning into pitches Mo Vaughn-style
in the hopes of advancing to first base.

Saturday, September 23, Cuba

Faced with a wobbling Cuban team that’s been characterized widely as sloppy
and not really trying, the U.S. has decided to concede the match and give
the nod to their worst starter, 30-year-old Rick Krivda. They feel
that a left-handed veteran is the right matchup against Cuba.

Krivda’s stats this year are not bad: a 3.12 ERA at the time I wrote the
pitcher preview, but he’d allowed 132 hits and walked 57, while striking
out 92, for a KWH of 1.12. Only Todd Williams has worse ratios on
this team. Krivda doesn’t have any good pitches, but has decent control.
Tommy Lasorda could well have started Jon Rauch on four days’ rest.
Rauch is a huge guy, throws low-90s heat and doesn’t walk anybody. His KWH
was 3.95 after his mid-season promotion to Double-A.

I think this choice was made because the Dutch beat the Cubans using a
starter without great stuff who hit his spots all day. Team USA, seeing
this, figured that if that was how you beat the Cubans, well, they’ve got a
pitcher just like that! The truth of the matter is that Cuba has looked bad
this tournament, and this is when you want to pile it on and make them beat
your best, rather than hope to lull them to sleep with veteran hypnotism.
Of course, if this works and the U.S. somehow comes out of this with a
victory, Lasorda will be hailed as a genius.

Sunday, September 24, Australia

I’m looking forward to this game after the pain of the loss to Cuba.
Kurt Ainsworth faces Chris Snelling. Dave Nilsson gets
a chance to throw out lumbering Ernie Young as he tries to steal
second base. Unfortunately for the Aussies, they don’t have a lot in the
way of pitching, certainly not in the class of Ainsworth, so they’ll be
looking for a strong performance from Mark Hutton, who struggled
against Japan, or Brad Thomas, who struggled against Korea.

So who will make the medal round? Most likely the U.S. at 6-1, followed by
Cuba and Japan at 5-2 and Australia squeaking in at 4-3. That would give us
an excellent Cuba/Japan semifinal game, second in the medal competition to
the probable U.S./Cuba game, which will be colossal.

Reader Mail

Thanks first to everyone who’s sent me e-mail. I’d like to take a minute to
respond to some of the highlights:

John Perkins wrote:


Not only do the Dodgers stink in Olympic dealings (though give them some
slack on Adrian Burnside who I believe is legitimately injured), but
look at the Orioles. The O's drop Mike Kinkade from their ML roster
so that he could participate in the Olympics and replace him with Eugene
Kingsale
, depriving The Netherlands of an Olympian.

I hadn’t thought of that at all. The Orioles did make a big deal about
letting Kinkade head to Sydney, and called Kingsale up for their pennant
run. The Mariners, I should mention, let their international players like
Chris Snelling go freely, with the organization’s blessings.

And on the subject of my derision for the run-and-gun baseball they’ve been
playing down under, KB writes:


...[Tommy Lasorda] took a couple of good catch-and-throw guys in Marcus
Jensen
and Pat Borders because he saw early on that in
international competition you can shut the other guy's running game down,
but they can't stop yours. He can run his boys wild on the bases because
the best that they'll face are Dave Nilsson and Ariel Pestano
or Fred Manrique (how old is he, 40?). He might get a runner or two
thrown out, but generally he'll be able to snag better than 80%, so it'll
pay off in the long run. Unless he has trying to steal
second with two outs in the bottom of the ninth in the final game down one
run (see World Series, 1926), he'll get away with it.

I’m sort of skeptical that Lasorda has given the subject that much thought,
but this is an excellent point. He’s gotten away with it so far: the team
is six of seven on stolen-base attempts, and an 85% rate is a productive
rate in any offensive era, in any park.

I had thought that the much-talked-about small baseball that supposedly
ruled in international baseball would have led to the development of
sophisticated anti-baserunning tactics, but this is apparently not the
case. Reading through the box scores (on the amazingly slow IBM site, which
features lovely colored line scores), I see that teams are running wild
everwhere–except against the U.S. Teams are 0-for-1 in stealing against
Borders and Jensen, unless I’m reading the boxscores wrong, while there
appears to be an average of three stolen bases a game in your average
Olympic matchup so far.

So I think this is a very good point, and something I’ve neglected to give
Lasorda credit for: somehow, between the selection of pitchers and
catchers, he’s scared other teams into not running on Team USA at all, and
at the same time been able to make the stolen base a productive tool for a
roster that hardly stole any bases in the States this year.

A brief plea: if anyone can get me a Chris Snelling Australian jersey,
they’ll earn my eternal gratitude. Or just point me in the right direction
for some thanks with an expiration date.

Derek Zumsteg can be reached at dzumsteg@baseballprospectus.com.

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe