CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe
No Previous Article
<< Previous Column
The Daily Prospectus: ... (04/13)
Next Column >>
The Daily Prospectus: ... (04/17)
No Next Article

April 14, 2000

The Daily Prospectus

Pacific Bell Park

by Steven Rubio

The new Pacific Bell Park in San Francisco is a lovely place to watch a baseball game, interesting and quirky, if lacking in the history that only time will help it accumulate.

In all the media coverage of the new ballyard, though, what doesn't come across is just how goofy the park is. Pac Bell Park is being touted as a blend of the old and the new, but its nods to the past are more theme park than Fenway Park. And it's hard to get that nostalgic, old-fashioned Base Ball feeling when there's a gigantic Coke bottle beyond the left-field bleachers.

The park is like one in a video game, colorful, with ads everywhere you look. Given Pac Bell's nominal status as the first ballpark built with private funds in almost 40 years, it is understandable the team has to make up that money somewhere, and some of the ads are almost appealing. But, to note one negative example, the giant scoreboard in center field has too much advertising and not enough space devoted to game-related information.

The Positives

As it turns out, the Coke bottle, which I confess I dreaded in advance, actually looks fun. It's functional, too, with slides inside the bottle for kids of all ages to enjoy. But the spirit of the park is clear to anyone who looks out into that "Coca Cola Fan Lot" and sees the Coke bottle alongside a huge, old-school, four-fingered baseball mitt replicated with astonishing accuracy. Because what you notice is that the mitt next to the Coke bottle looks odd, even though the opposite should be true. The Coke bottle is closer to the spirit of the place than the mitt.

My apologies to fans who live in cities where this is the norm, but the single most remarkable thing about the place--to a Bay Area resident--is that you can walk to it. There hasn't been anything like this around here since Seals Stadium in the late 1950s. It's a real joy to be walking down a street in downtown San Francisco knowing there is a baseball game at the end of the trail. Of course, there's also the sneaky-good feeling of going to a ballgame while others are at work, a feeling which is magnified when you are walking right by those very people.

I didn't really believe the hype on this, but remarkably, they've managed to keep the wind out. It was pretty windy walking around outside the park, but when I went to my seat, there was hardly any wind at all. Of course, it is still cool at night, but it was always the wind that made Candlestick so bitter, and this is an enormous improvement. The first night game at the new park, on Wednesday, ended with a suspended outcome after April showers blew in. It featured an occasional gust, but even during the storm it was more of a breeze than a blast.

Meanwhile, there are places in the outer areas where you see folks just standing around chatting and taking in the view of the city skyline. There wasn't a single place at Candlestick where you'd want to do that, and there isn't a place like that at the Oakland Coliseum, either. Here, you could step out for a beer or a hot dog and find yourself forgetting to go back to the game. From a purist's standpoint, the idea that someone would miss two innings taking in the view is appalling, but, as with so much about this park, the contrast with life at Candlestick is so stark that you can't blame folks for their giddiness.

Before the first night game, I found myself behind the centerfield scoreboard, sitting on a comfy bench, eating a tri-tip sandwich from Orlando's Caribbean BBQ, watching Hall-of-Famer Cha-Cha Cepeda himself hanging out behind the counter. I could have sat there forever.

Sitting in the upper deck, looking out at the boats on the bay, the game going on lazily below, it was pretty easy to just mellow out. Which is probably good news for fans of visiting teams like the Dodgers. The local fans were a happy bunch and while there was plenty of "Beat LA" yelling, overall it was alarmingly good-natured. I even apologized for bumping into a guy with a Dodger jacket on. I think the Giants are going to have a "family" crowd now; I didn't see a single fight in the stands, a first for a Giant/Dodger game.

The Negatives

The place isn't perfect, of course. There's a mechanical ballplayer named Rusty who comes out of the right-field wall on occasion, and he is so colossally stupid you can't believe anyone thought he would be a good idea. In the upper deck, seats are kind of snug. Leg room is at a premium, and one person in our vicinity with real long legs didn't like it. Health codes apparently preclude the installation of trough-style urinals in the men's room, which means men's bathroom lines are as long as the women's. I suppose women will find this to be poetic justice, but I would have preferred everyone having short lines to everyone having long ones.

On the Field

How does the park play? It's far too early for conclusive remarks, but there are plenty of first impressions to go around. Center field looks huge; Marvin Benard doesn't stand a chance out there. The Giants need to revive Dwayne Murphy or something equally drastic. Hey, it worked for the Dodgers and Kevin Elster.

Also, despite the excellent job the builders have done in keeping the wind out, this is still San Francisco, and it looks like high-hit balls especially are going to get caught up in the wind. This will be an adventure for the fielders, and a boon to or bane of pitchers depending on the wind's direction.

Probably the most characteristic play on Opening Day was a triple by Giants' catcher Doug Mirabelli. It was his first major-league triple, and it might not be his last, given that it's 421 feet to right-center. In fact, as easy as it was for Mirabelli to leg out the triple, you have to imagine there'll be more than the usual number of inside-the-park home runs as well.

Ultimately, the Pacific Bell Park experience is as unique as the home-run balls that will land in the waters of McCovey Cove outside the right-field fence. The question remains: how many people will want to come out on a cold Tuesday night in August 2003 to watch the Giants and Expos? Ownership is counting on 81 sellouts a year, and they've got a lot of loan payments to worry about thanks to their admirable attempt at private financing; the future of the team is far more tenuous than the hype would suggest. But for now at least, Pac Bell Park offers so many different amusements that even a lackluster game on the field won't detract from a good time.

Steven Rubio can be reached at srubio@baseballprospectus.com.

Related Content:  The Who,  Inside The Park,  AT&T Park

0 comments have been left for this article.

No Previous Article
<< Previous Column
The Daily Prospectus: ... (04/13)
Next Column >>
The Daily Prospectus: ... (04/17)
No Next Article

What You Need to Know: Engel in the Outfield
Short Relief: Underappreciated Player Week: ...
Premium Article Weekly Wrap: August 18, 2017
Premium Article Guarding The Lines: Here The Fastball Are No...
Cold Takes: Doomed and Determined
Circle Change: The Best Failure in Baseball
Banjo Hitter: The First 162: Alex Bregman

2000-04-24 - Prospectus Q&A: Mark Wolfson
2000-04-14 - The Daily Prospectus: Pacific Bell Park
2000-04-10 - Prospectus Q&A: Ray Ratto
2000-03-28 - The Daily Prospectus: Manager Tendencies
1999-09-10 - NL West Notebook

2000-04-19 - The Daily Prospectus: Start Spreading the Ne...
2000-04-18 - The Daily Prospectus: It's Just a Fantasy
2000-04-17 - The Daily Prospectus: The Wild Weekend
2000-04-14 - The Daily Prospectus: Pacific Bell Park
2000-04-13 - The Daily Prospectus: The Cards Are Stacked
2000-04-12 - The Daily Prospectus: Introducing...The DiSa...
2000-04-11 - The Daily Prospectus: Warming Things Up