BP Comment Quick Links
![]() |
|
|
The First-ever Baseball Prospectus Futures Guide - now just $6.86 at Amazon ( bbp.cx/fg ) |
|
|
June 2, 2006 Prospectus MatchupsAll-Star Voting and Rookie Factoids
Brandon Webb ascendant The following is not a paid endorsement. When you think about it, $180 isn't a whole lot of money to pay for the MLB Extra Innings Package. If you break it down to a per-game basis, that's quite a bargain-not that you can watch every game in its entirety. Having it gives you the chance to hit targets of opportunity like Wednesday night's Brandon Webb vs. Pedro Martinez showdown. It's rare enough that two of the top-ten VORP pitchers lock horns, and rarer still when they actually perform as advertised, breezing through their respective lineups in literally short order. Martinez posted his highest Game Score of the season (80), and Webb his third-highest (73). Webb has had only one bad start this year, his May 15 effort against San Diego in which he surrendered five runs in six innings. He has allowed nine or ten hits on four occasions, but has pitched around the trouble. In fact, of the top ten VORP pitchers, he has the highest BABIP: BABIP: Pitcher (rank in VORP) .296: Webb (1st) .270: Bronson Arroyo (7th) .266: Tom Glavine (9th) .263: Roy Halladay (6th) .255: Justin Verlander (8th) .247: Mike Mussina (2nd) .243: Barry Zito (10th) .237: Jason Schmidt (4th) .211: Pedro Martinez (5th) .198: Jose Contreras (3rd) This has been Webb's general BABIP neighborhood for the past three seasons. He was at .310 last year and .294 in 2004. In 2003, he came in at .269. None of these are extreme figures overall, but it's interesting to note the company he's keeping relative to their numbers in this category. Scott Kazmir (11th in VORP) is working with a high BAPIP (.332), as are the next two in line, Johan Santana and Roy Oswalt (.313 and .318 respectively). Nobody outside of Derek Lowe has a groundball-to-flyball ratio quite like Webb's. If a few more of those grounders found leather, his already impressive traditional stats would really have people taking notice. Two things have really allowed him to move from a well-kept secret to someone people want to invite to dinner parties. The first is something over which he has no control, but that's always nice to have. For the first time in his career, Webb is getting decent run support:
2006: 6.12 runs per start 2005: 4.24 2004: 4.24 2003: 4.48 The second is the improvement he's made in his control. Walks-per-nine, hit batsmen and wild pitches have all been drastically reduced, not only from his unfortunate 2004 sophomore year, but even from last season's improvement over that year. All-Star voting MLB sent an email beseeching me to vote for the All-Star Game starters. For inspiration, they have included a listing of the early leaders. (I love how they make use of the old ward boss joke, "Vote early and often." They really mean it, though.) Let's see how the voice of the people is stacking up against 2006 performance so far based on VORP. Defensive strengths and shortcomings won't especially enter into this discussion. Catcher
First Base
Second Base
Shortstop
Third Base
Outfield
Dusty Baker: friend of youth If this keeps up, Dusty Baker is going to end up replacing Captain Kangaroo as the favorite personality of the young. Listed below are the percentage of at bats and innings given over to rookies so far in 2006. We all knew the Marlins were on a youth kick. To actually see that almost two out of three at bats have been given over to newbies, though, is pretty startling. The Cubs rank third among position players and second among pitchers. Obviously, Baker's hand has been forced by injuries and, to be honest, a good percentage of the at bats have gone to Ronny Cedeno. (Note: our database does not always identify when a rookie passes his service time requirement. Suffice it to say then, that these lists, if nothing else, show time given to players with little major league experience.)
Team PA Rookie PA Pct. FLO 1900 1200 .632 PIT 1971 334 .169 CHN 1844 295 .160 SDN 1974 277 .140 LAN 2027 282 .139 WAS 1989 274 .138 BAL 1959 234 .119 MIL 1965 227 .116 KCA 1816 204 .112 ANA 1928 200 .104 SEA 1984 204 .103 ARI 1953 169 .087 PHI 1951 159 .081 NYA 1951 127 .065 CHA 1962 127 .065 ATL 2000 104 .052 SFN 1952 84 .043 COL 1955 80 .041 TEX 1976 74 .037 SLN 1962 64 .033 NYN 2010 54 .027 DET 1926 48 .025 HOU 2041 38 .019 MIN 1900 32 .017 CIN 2004 30 .015 BOS 1963 22 .011 CLE 1980 19 .010 TOR 1936 6 .003 Team IP Rookie IP Pct. FLO 431.2 170.1 .394 CHN 438.2 100.1 .229 DET 453.1 103.1 .228 HOU 469.2 100.1 .214 TEX 451.1 93.2 .208 LAN 455.1 91.2 .201 TOR 440.0 78.0 .177 MIL 448.2 63.2 .142 BAL 446.1 61.0 .137 WAS 461.1 63.0 .137 MIN 437.0 59.1 .136 ATL 454.2 57.2 .127 CLE 439.2 54.2 .124 CIN 453.2 54.2 .121 TBA 444.0 51.0 .115 KCA 420.0 47.1 .113 SDN 464.1 47.2 .103 SFN 452.1 44.1 .098 SLN 450.1 42.1 .094 CHA 445.0 41.1 .093 BOS 430.2 39.1 .091 SEA 471.1 41.2 .088 NYN 462.1 37.0 .080 PIT 454.0 24.2 .054 ARI 442.1 24.0 .054 COL 451.0 21.2 .048 PHI 449.2 11.1 .025 OAK 449.0 10.1 .023 ANA 452.0 9.0 .020 NYA 435.2 4.1 .010 Thanks to William Burke for contributing data research to this column.
|