Prospectus Game of the Week: Arizona Diamondbacks @ Colorado Rockies, 9/11/05

Five things I learned watching Sunday’s Diamondbacks/Rockies game:

1. Aaron Cook is one of the most interesting stories in
   baseball.

   On August 1, 2004, Cook pitched a complete game to beat the Diamondbacks,
   his fastball topping out at 95 mph. The start continued a stretch in
   which the big righty looked to be coming into his own. Though it was
   clear he’d never ring up enough strikeouts to be a dominant pitcher, it
   looked like he’d be able to get batters out and forge a successful career.
   In the third inning of his next start, though, Cook left the game complaining of
   dizziness. The diagnosis? Blood clots in his lungs, requiring blood
   thinners and at least six months away from the game.

   This season, Cook has made it all the way back, with great results. In nine
   starts he’s put up a 5-1 record and a 3.23 ERA. On Sunday he threw another
   complete game for the Rockies, again against the D’backs, for a 7-2 win.
   Jason Giambi and others have done a lot more
   statistically to merit Comeback Player of the Year consideration. But few
   carry a better backstory than Cook.

   Here’s his line through nine starts, including Sunday’s game:

   
   IP       H    HR   BB   K   BABIP  GB/F
   55.2    65     2    9   18   .309  3.32
   
   

   Cook’s overall line looked even more outrageous before Sunday’s game. That
   contest saw Cook strike out five and yield two homers to Troy
   Glaus–the only two he’d ceded all year. His groundball/flyball
   rate ranks
   7th among all MLB starters with at least five starts.

   Can a pitcher survive–even thrive–striking out three batters a game,
   even with pinpoint control and a microscopic home-run rate? In the
   short-term, the answer is obviously yes. In addition to Cook’s nine-start
   success, Kirk Saarloos also ranks among MLB’s best in
   GB/FB ratio, while also striking out less than three batters per
   nine innings (45 in 143 2/3 after fanning five in six frames last night;
   after last night his ERA stood at 3.89, and he
   ranked among the 30 best pitchers in the AL according to VORP).

   The Rockies announcers kept raving about Cook’s ability to get hitters to
   put the ball in play–he’s thrown less than three pitches per batter this
   season, one of the lowest figures in the majors. But that approach forces
   your defense to catch a ton of balls, a tough proposition in a park with
   an outfield as spacious as Coors Field. On the other hand, Cook’s sinker
   is for real. Hitters rolled over on it all day for groundouts, and yes,
   several swung over it and whiffed too.

   Limiting baserunners by keeping walks down, cutting down on big innings by
   keeping the ball in the park, and keeping pitch counts in check with a
   ball-in-play approach are all traits that serve a pitcher well in the most
   nightmarish pitching environment of our generation. In acquiring
   low-strikeout, low-walk, high-groundball-rate pitcher Zach
   Day earlier this year from the Nationals, Dan O’Dowd and company
   could find themselves with a set of twins at the top of their rotation
   next year. If the Rockies aren’t going to land a Roger
   Clemens through free agency and have trouble developing
   conventional pitchers through their system, The Cook Convention could be
   an interesting Mile High experiment.

2. Sunday’s lineup showed that the Diamondbacks are going to have a numbers
   crunch on their hands in the outfield and first base.

   • At age 25, Chad Tracy‘s had the power spike he needed to
     be a viable hitter at a corner spot, putting up a .291/.343/.515 line
     through Monday that even in offense-friendly Arizona helps his club. A
     year away from arbitration eligibility, he’s a valuable asset for near
     the league minimum. Will the club keep him in right, move him to another
     position, or have to make a tough choice given the talent in the pipeline?

   • Shawn Green‘s .297/.364/.504 line has also given the
     D’backs a boost. Like Tracy in right, Green has also fared better than
     expected defensively to date, playing a month of surprisingly fluid center
     field. He’s under contract for $8 million in 2006, $9.5 million in 2007,
     with a $10 million mutual option in 2008. Do they keep him in center and
     hope his defense and his health hold up, move him back to right, or try
     something else?

   • Tony Clark has come out of nowhere to become a terror at
     the plate, hitting .308 with an outrageous .633 slugging average. While
     skeptics figured his power would only last as long as he found favorable
     matchups as a part-time player, Clark’s continued to mash in a regular
     role. The D’backs think so highly of him that they have him batting in the
     cleanup slot ahead of Glaus, he of the 34 homers and fringe-MVP candidate
     performance this season. They even went so far as to sign him to a
     two-year contract extension, complete with a no-trade clause through the
     2006 season. If Clark keeps hitting, how will the D’backs be able to sit
     him down?

   • Conor Jackson has started slowly in his first exposure to
     the big leagues, managing just a .220/.319/.373 performance and forced to
     ride the pine even with the Diamondbacks all but out of it (he pinch-hit
     in the ninth inning Sunday). But Jackson is going to be a star, and it’s
     going to happen soon. He toyed with Triple-A pitching this season, bashing
     to the tune of .354/.457/.553. He owns an incredible batting eye, racking
     up 69 walks and 32 strikeouts in 93 games at Tuscon this season, scoffing
     at pitches even an inch off the plate when I saw him play Tacoma this
     summer. Do the D’backs send him back to Triple-A to start next season, make
     him a part-timer player, or turn him loose on the league, at the expense
     of Clark’s playing time?

   • Wanting to avoid adding him to the 40-man roster until they have to next
     season, the Diamondbacks elected not to promote Carlos
     Quentin to the big leagues upon roster expansion. All Quentin has
     done is hit .301/.422/.520 in his age-22 season in Triple-A, following a
     combined 985 OPS in High-A and Double-A ball last year. As with
     Jackson, Quentin’s numbers come with the caveat of robust hitting
     environments. That said, both the adjusted numbers and the scouting
     reports contend he’s going to hit a ton in the majors, likely soon if
     given the chance. How long will Arizona let him demolish minor-league
     pitching before he gets the call?

   Though D’back loyalists may shudder at the suggestion, the best solution to
   the problem may be the toughest one to make politically: Luis
   Gonzalez shouldn’t start for Arizona in 2006. Though Gonzalez’s
   walk rate remains healthy, a .268 average and .444 slugging average won’t
   cut it for a left fielder at the BOB. His fragged throwing arm, declining
   mobility, rising injury risk and just-passed 38th birthday don’t help,
   either. Gonzalez is signed for one more year, due to make $11.5 million
   next season before the club opts out of a $10 million option in ’07. The
   D’backs likely won’t have the fortitude to sit Gonzalez for younger talent,
   which could hurt the team’s chances next year.
   The team would thus do well to look for a Sammy Sosa-type
   deal this off-season, agreeing to pay part of Gonzalez’s salary in
   exchange for young talent, preferably up the middle where the club’s weak.
   Gonzalez has more left in the tank than Sosa did after last year, though,
   so here’s hoping they get more than Jerry Hairston and
   some magic beans.

3. The Russ Ortiz signing going bust ranks as one of the
   most predictable events…uh, maybe ever. In the
   first of his winter meetings reports in December, Joe Sheehan had this
   to say about the four-year, $33-million deal the D’backs gave Ortiz:

   
   You don’t usually get the kind of agreement on a transaction that I heard
   about the Russ Ortiz signing. No one I talked to likes it, and a few
   people were calling it the worst signing of this winter.
   

   That’s saying a lot in an off-season that saw Carl Lindner balk all winter
   at spending money, then suddenly issue an ultimatum to his front office to
   sign the best pitcher available, resulting in a three-year, $25.5 million
   Titanic of a deal with Eric Milton (though Milton’s deal
   came two-and-a-half weeks after Ortiz’s). Still, Ortiz may earn that
   dubious distinction. He ranks as the worst pitcher in the majors with at
   least 100 innings pitched this season, according
   to BP’s Support-Neutral report.

   As much as we talk about the masses becoming more sophisticated in how
   they view the game, the old biases still rear their ugly head again and
   again. Rockies announcer Drew Goodman, describing Ortiz’s 2005 season:
   “This is a guy who’s had a lot of success in the big leagues, but this
   year has been an aberration.” Goodman then went on to note that Ortiz has
   won 82 games since the 2000 All-Star break, tied with Matt
   Morris for second in the National League. No mention of Ortiz’s
   low batting average on balls in play numbers bailing him out (an
   admittedly advanced concept for a standard baseball telecast) or the
   pitfalls that flawed pitchers often run into after leaving Leo Mazzone’s
   care (hello Jaret Wright). Goodman did briefly mention Ortiz’s bugaboo,
   the awful control that saw Ortiz average 106 walks a season from 1999 to
   2004.

   Even the biggest pessimist would have struggled to conceive a 6.88 ERA and
   a K/BB rate of 44/58 this season. But maybe Ortiz, along with Milton and
   so many other colossal free-agent blunders over the years will eventually
   convince teams that just because someone’s the biggest-name free agent on
   the market doesn’t mean that ignoring his glaring flaws and spending the
   GDP of Luxembourg is a good idea.

4. At least so far, I was wrong about Troy Glaus.

   While BP as a group was somewhat
   non-committal publicly about the four-year, $45 million contract the
   D’backs gave Glaus over the winter, privately I muttered about the risk of
   spending that much money on a player who had what was then thought to be a
   highly questionable shoulder. That the deal would only pan out if he could
   effectively man third base past his 33rd birthday made me more skeptical.
   I’ll fess up and say it: I loved Glaus as a hitter, but thought the deal
   was a bad idea, all things considered.

   Glaus ranks 5th
   among MLB third basemen in VORP; he’ll pass the injured Aramis
   Ramirez and likely finish 4th, barring a big run by
   Chipper Jones. Glaus absolutely obliterated four pitches
   out of the park in the weekend series, including a shot into the far, far
   away concourse in left-center Saturday and two ropes on Sunday. But more
   than just his prodigious power, which has never been in doubt, the
   significance of VORP is that it speaks to both Glaus’ productivity and his
   ability to stay healthy and in the lineup every day. The D’backs probably
   cost themselves a few runs over the course of the year by batting Glaus
   fifth and Gonzalez third in the lineup–thus giving the inferior hitter
   more plate appearances over the course of the season. But that’s manager
   Bob Melvin’s doing, not the GM’s. Joe Garagiola Jr. gets full marks for
   trusting his medical staff, taking a calculated risk with Glaus, and at
   least through year one of the four-year deal, having it pay off in spades.

5. The Rockies need to acquire an impact hitter, or better yet, two or three.

   Todd Helton‘s back problems finally caught up to him this
   year. While we could see a bit of a bounceback toward the mean in 2006,
   Helton’s injury concerns coupled with him turning 33 next August make him
   a poor bet to ever again produce at a superstar level. Though his
   .303/.429/.505 line is certainly nothing to sneeze at, it looks less
   impressive after translating for park and other effects (.284/.415/.482)
   and is well off the .620 or better slugging averages Helton put up in four
   out of five seasons from 2000 to 2004. Matt Holliday‘s
   emerged as better than the overrated Quad-A fodder we thought he might be,
   but he still lacks the power and Helton-like walk rates to lead a club.
   Clint Barmes far exceeded expectations early this year
   before going down to the infamous “deer meat” injury; he’ll face a sterner
   test given 600 at-bats next season. In other words, no one on the big
   league roster projects as an elite offensive player.

   Down on the farm, the situation is only marginally brighter. Jeff
   Baker was slowed by a hand injury this year and hasn’t yet
   developed into the power monster the team may have hoped for. Ian
   Stewart remains an elite prospect, though his star has dimmed a
   bit after an otherwordly 2004 season at age 19. Even if both make big
   strides next season, it may be a while before they settle in as top big
   league performers.

   With a cash cow of a stadium, attendance figures that dwarf other NL
   doormats and a fan base that’s shown a willingness to pack the joint when
   given a reason, the Rockies have both the revenue stream and revenue
   potential to warrant opening the pocketbook this off-season. That doesn’t
   mean going the Russ Ortiz route and overpaying for a name player likely to
   disappoint, though–a recycled Jeromy Burnitz or
   Preston Wilson or a 40-plus Craig Biggio
   isn’t going to cut it. Instead, the Rockies need to think boldly. Will
   Boston’s front office disagreements prompt them to trade Manny
   Ramirez and pay a big chunk of his salary the next three years to
   boot? Can Brian Giles be had on a two-year deal if given
   a little more per annum? Will the Reds follow through on rumors that
   they’d trade Adam Dunn?

   More than mastering the mystical secrets of Coors Field or daring to
   ask what a Rocky Mountain oyster is, Dan O’Dowd (or whoever mans the GM
   chair in Denver this off-season) needs to get down to basics. Stop making
   excuses, get the best talent, and go out and win the highly winnable NL
   West within the next two seasons. The same goes for the D’backs.

   Then maybe this time next year we’ll be writing about the Rox and Snakes
   as September contenders, not the last two contractually obligated teams in
   the Game of the Week rainbow.