CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe
No Previous Article
No Next Article

October 27, 2003

A TAD Here or There

A Closer Look at Team Defense

by James Click

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.

a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

Over the last two articles, I've looked at various methods for removing some of the complicating factors when looking at team defense. Based on the idea that team defensive metrics were really a measure of three separate factors (park, pitching, and actual defense), we determined one way to remove park factors (PADE: Park Adjusted Defensive Efficiency) and another to remove pitching factors (PIDE: Pitching Independent Defensive Efficiency). By removing these outside influences in our defensive metrics, we've leveled the playing field, allowing us to better judge which teams have the best team defense, based simply on the percentage of balls in play that they convert into outs.

With both PADE and PIDE, we removed one factor, but not both. We were able to see either how a pitching staff and defense together looked compared to the league or how a defense and park looked against the league. What we did not have was one metric that simply measured defense versus defense, our ultimate goal.

To produce that metric, we have to move back a step. Rather than looking at the final result of PADE and PIDE, we need to look at their baselines--the expected performance of the defense based on either the pitching or park. These baselines were included in the PIDE column as Team Expected In Play Average (tExIPAvg), but were not included in the PADE article. Here are both baselines, side by side:

Team                   BasePIDE       BasePADE
Anaheim Angels           1.0026         0.9992
Arizona Diamondbacks     1.0087         0.9893
Atlanta Braves           0.9917         1.0042
Baltimore Orioles        1.0113         1.0093
Boston Red Sox           1.0085         0.9905
Chicago Cubs             0.9924         1.0062
Chicago White Sox        1.0045         1.0049
Cincinnati Reds          0.9939         1.0051
Cleveland Indians        1.0007         0.9990
Colorado Rockies         1.0110         0.9794
Detroit Tigers           0.9883         1.0028
Florida Marlins          0.9989         1.0025
Houston Astros           0.9786         0.9951
Kansas City Royals       1.0009         0.9886
Los Angeles Dodgers      0.9958         1.0127
Milwaukee Brewers        0.9953         1.0072
Minnesota Twins          1.0055         0.9942
Montreal Expos           0.9886         0.9999
New York Mets            0.9988         1.0064
New York Yankees         0.9952         1.0082
Oakland Athletics        1.0111         1.0074
Philadelphia Phillies    0.9781         1.0117
Pittsburgh Pirates       0.9905         0.9988
San Diego Padres         1.0004         1.0076
San Francisco Giants     1.0097         0.9987
Seattle Mariners         1.0310         1.0104
St Louis Cardinals       0.9971         1.0020
Tampa Bay Devil Rays     1.0209         0.9961
Texas Rangers            0.9927         0.9910
Toronto Blue Jays        0.9972         0.9963

As before, the higher the number, the easier things are on the defense. Typically, when applying park factors or other adjustments to statistics, we simply multiply the park factor to get the adjusted statistic. However, our park and pitching factors are reversed, with higher numbers representing a higher standard for the defense. In order to make our measurements accurate, we'll multiply by the inverse of the baseline. This calculation makes our formula for determining Team Adjusted Defense (TAD):

TAD = Def_Eff * 1/(BasePIDE) * 1/(BasePADE)

It should also be noted that when generating adjusted statistics, the park factor is halved before multiplying. This adjustment is made because we're using the player or team's home park factor, yet teams only play half of their games at home (excepté les Expos). That adjustment doesn't need to be made to either PIDE or PADE. PIDE involves pitching; teams play all 162 games behind the same pitching staff. PADE was already park adjusted for each team's entire schedule, weighted by the number of games they played in each park, so again, there's no reason to halve the park factor.

Before we get to the final numbers, one more note should be made. As mentioned last time, the BasePIDE range is significantly larger than the BasePADE range. The likely explanation for this is that teams play behind a unique pitching staff (save for trades) all season long while they play in many of the same parks. Sharing the same venues tends to keep the range tighter because extreme parks have only half the effect of extreme pitching staffs. Therefore, our final metric will usually be altered more by pitching staffs than by park factors. In the battle of the lame acronyms, PIDE wins.

Finally, here is the end result, in a scale that should look similar to the regular Defensive Efficiency charts:

Team                      TAD
Houston Astros          .7390
Philadelphia Phillies   .7235
Atlanta Braves          .7199
Montreal Expos          .7185
Cleveland Indians       .7168
Pittsburgh Pirates      .7162
San Francisco Giants    .7158
Anaheim Angels          .7158
Los Angeles Dodgers     .7140
Oakland Athletics       .7131
Kansas City Royals      .7130
St Louis Cardinals      .7125
Chicago White Sox       .7122
Detroit Tigers          .7108
Tampa Bay Devil Rays    .7107
Chicago Cubs            .7106
Minnesota Twins         .7101
Arizona Diamondbacks    .7092
Cincinnati Reds         .7061
San Diego Padres        .7060
Toronto Blue Jays       .7035
Florida Marlins         .7029
New York Mets           .7022
Seattle Mariners        .7019
Boston Red Sox          .7013
Colorado Rockies        .7011
Texas Rangers           .6989
Milwaukee Brewers       .6984
New York Yankees        .6961
Baltimore Orioles       .6837

The distance by which Houston outplayed the rest of the league in the field is a little unsettling, especially considering Craig Biggio was roaming center field, but that's what the numbers say. The team that moved the most from Bill James' original Defensive Efficiency ratings was Seattle, falling from tops in the league to the bottom third, the result of playing in so many defense friendly parks and behind a very defense-friendly staff. The secret to Seattle's defensive success this season appears to be due to their pitching and park more so than with other teams around the league.

Again, what exactly is TAD good for? TAD is a highly independent measure of team defense, telling us how good the defense is rather than depending on the pitching staff or the park to do the work for them. If you're looking for how a pitcher would do on a different team, it's best to use PIDE, removing only the pitching numbers from a defense, but leaving park factors in place. Likewise, when determining how a defense would do in a new stadium, PADE is a better measure because the pitching staff would remain the same. However, if what your chasing is simply how good the team in the field is compared to everyone else, then TAD is your metric of choice.

Related Content:  Defense,  Pitching,  Park Factors,  Marlins Park

0 comments have been left for this article.

No Previous Article
No Next Article

Premium Article Rubbing Mud: The Mental Side of Shifting
Baseball Therapy: Positional Anarchy!
Fantasy Article The Stash List: 21st Edition
Short Relief: The Men Who Failed to be Machi...
Eyewitness Accounts: August 24, 2017
Premium Article Flu-Like Symptoms: The Rise and Fall of Rule...
Let It Eat: Bad Breaks

Premium Article Under The Knife: All Kinds of Time
The Week in Quotes: October 20-26

2004-02-20 - Premium Article The A-Rod/Jeter Defense Dilemma
2003-12-15 - Live from the (Mock) Winter Meetings
2003-12-12 - Live from the (Mock) Winter Meetings
2003-10-27 - Premium Article A TAD Here or There
2003-10-22 - Premium Article Getting PADE, Redux
2003-10-09 - Premium Article Getting PADE
2003-09-19 - Checks and Balances