CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article Minor League Update: A... (11/11)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article One Move: American Lea... (11/08)
Next Column >>
Premium Article One Move: American Lea... (11/12)
Next Article >>
Fantasy Offseason Prev... (11/11)

November 11, 2013

One Move

National League Central

by Craig Goldstein

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

This is the fourth installment in the One Move series. If you'd like to check out any of the previous editions in this series, you can find them here: AL Central, NL West, AL East.

Chicago Cubs
The Move: Trade for David Price
Originally, there was a detailed trade offer above. Upon further review, however, I don’t want this to be about whether the offer was good enough. The Cubs have the pieces to make the move, and while the Rays asking price might be too expensive for it to be a worthwhile move, there seems to be a middle ground that could work for both teams. I’m advising the Cubs to make this trade under the condition that it would fall in that middle ground. This means no, it will not consist of Kris Bryant, Javier Baez, and Albert Almora. It also means that, no, it will not consist of Christian Villanueva, Kyle Hendricks, and Mike Olt. Instead, imagine a scenario that makes it hard for either team to pull the trigger immediately but in the end makes both organizations better.

The rationale for such a move from the Cubs perspective is layered. It’s unlikely that they’ll compete with the Cardinals, Pirates and Reds in their division for 2014, which makes the move less effective as you lose a year of Price’s prime, and you’re absolutely paying for that year. The reason you make this move though, is the increasingly rare opportunity to acquire elite pitching on the open market. It’s reasonable to suggest that whichever team does trade for Price will also work hard to extend him, meaning you acquire him now or you acquire him never. The Cubs are Mariana Trench level deep in hitting prospects, with multiple elite bats to boot. What they lack are impact arms, and while acquiring C.J. Edwards in the Matt Garza deal was a step in that direction, they still need more.

Price gives Chicago a front-end option for their rotation and would allow them to field a competitive team in 2015, depending on the progress of some of their remaining prospects. It’s certainly an aggressive move, but one that would represent to the league and fans both that ownership and management is ready for this team to compete in the near term. While this might not seem like the best reasoning, this is an ownership group that has been criticized for their lack of spending in one of the country’s largest markets. With a new TV deal on the horizon though, the front office has the chance to acquire an impact arm who isn’t yet on the wrong side of 30. Finding pitchers that have established themselves as elite rightfully costs a pretty penny. Even getting the chance to acquire such arms is rare and for a team that could be competitive in the next few years, acquiring (and extending) such an arm would be a coup.

Cincinnati Reds
The Move: Re-sign Shin-Soo Choo
It’s not exciting and it’s not necessarily the first move you think of for one of the smaller markets in baseball, especially in wake of Choo’s contract demands. He fits the Reds current plan perfectly though, and given how quickly windows of contention shut it’s a move they should make. Billy Hamilton is one of the most exciting prospects in baseball, but a top-of-the-order option he is not. His presence could shift Choo to a corner outfield spot, which is more befitting of his defensive abilities. Hamilton could likely use more minor league seasoning, and in the meantime Choo can fake it in center field while Ryan Ludwick mans left.

The money is obviously a concern here, but as mentioned in my previous article, every team in baseball is seeing a boost thanks to new national television contracts. Also helping here is the likely departure of Bronson Arroyo, who was not tendered a qualifying offer. The Reds payroll currently sits at $79.35 million before taking into account arbitration cases. Last year it sat at $106.855 million, so there should be room to add a contract in the general range that Choo is seeking. While there are plenty of concerns about Choo’s inability to hit left-handed pitching, this would be a move with the short term in mind, giving the Reds another crack at St. Louis—a team they actually bested in third-order wins last season.

Milwaukee Brewers
The Move: Trade Aramis Ramirez to LAD for Zach Lee
Milwaukee has a long road to contention, that much is clear. The best thing they can do, given the present construct of their team is to take a step back, shed some salary and add some talent that will help the team beyond 2014. This move does exactly that. The Dodgers have a hole the size of Cameron Diaz’s mouth at third base, and this represents an alternative to paying free agent dollars for Juan Uribe. Despite Ramirez’s present frailty, he put together an impressive .283/.370/.461 slash line including 12 home runs in 92 games. That’s a drastic upgrade from what Uribe offered in one of his better offensive seasons. The flipside of course is the utter lack of range that Ramirez provides, but another big bat might entice Dodgers management here.

In Lee, the Brewers would be receiving a long term rotation option. He’s not the top of the rotation type that he looked to be, or at least was perceived to be, when he signed a $5.25 million out of high school. What he is though is a high probability mid-rotation type, who works with a four-pitch mix and has a slider that can miss bats. Six years of control might seem like a lot for LA to give up in this scenario, especially when Ramirez only has one more year left on his contract. There is a mutual option for 2015 however, for $14 million, meaning that the Dodgers would pay $30 million over the course of two seasons for a third baseman that hits extremely well. In return, they’d be giving up a high-floor pitcher who they seem intent on not giving a chance in the major leagues, as they’re tied to every available pitching option on the market. Milwaukee gets another option for their rotation, as well as clearing $16 million from this year’s payroll that they can use to address their first base deficiency.

Pittsburgh Pirates
The Move: Don’t Let A.J. Burnett Retire
Like Cincinnati, there just isn’t a lot of flash here. That said, bringing back key pieces is a worthwhile endeavor. Burnett is reportedly not interested in playing elsewhere, and would have to come back at something of a reduced cost, as Pirates’ GM Neal Huntington recently indicated that the $14.1 million qualifying offer was not within Pittsburgh’s budget. The Pirates will return most everyone else from their most successful season in the last couple decades, though starting shortstop Clint Barmes is a free agent. Burnett’s 191 innings of 107 ERA+ work might not seem so urgent to replace, but with the going rate (Ervin Santana seeking $100M, and Ricky Nolasco seeking $80M) only escalating, any chance the Pirates can capitalize on Burnett’s appreciation of their team and environment, they need to take. Add in that it’s either Pittsburgh or retirement, and there’s a good chance Pittsburgh can keep the deal relatively short, increasing their flexibility.

St. Louis Cardinals
The Move: Stand Pat
Talk about excitement. Fresh on the heels of a recent report that the Cardinals are planning on talking to the Rockies about Troy Tulowitzki, and could follow that with talks with the Rangers about Elvis Andrus or Jurickson Profar, this might not be what anyone wants to hear. Let me explain though.

The Cardinals were the best team in the National League when it comes to run differential, and second in the majors trailing the Boston Red Sox. They did all this with working with a shortstop who may well have been hitting with a broom. This issue was amplified in the playoffs, as flaws tend to be, and have many calling for St. Louis to consummate one of the above trades or sign the likes of Stephen Drew. My contention is that, as bad as Pete Kozma is (and yes, he’s bad), a lower key move is called for here. Perhaps reaching once more into their system and instead turning to Ryan Jackson or signing a veteran like Brendan Ryan who can hit just as little but will field his heart out. A big factor in the NL-leading run differential was their relentless ability to hit with runners in scoring position. That’s unlikely to continue heading into next season of course, but with their closest rivals facing key departures, St. Louis is likely to be the best team in the NL Central whether they upgrade at shortstop or not.

The beauty of the St. Louis Cardinals, and the reason we all hate-admire them is their depth. Their ability to develop and retain their talent. To reload when one of their starters goes down. The best way for them to retain that advantage is to not trade it away. Yes, this means they might be overloaded at certain positions but as we’ve all seen teams with eight starting pitchers can be looking for help by June. That’s why depth is so important. I’m not advocating never cashing in on that depth, but giving Stephen Drew eight figures per year on a multi-year deal and losing a first round draft pick in the process doesn’t seem like the St. Louis way. Making a smaller move (perhaps a trade for Alexei Ramirez?) allows them to still keep their eyes on a big move down the line. As long as they can address the position by July 31st (or really, by the time playoff eligible players need to be set), St. Louis shouldn’t have any issues. Thanks to St. Louis’ ability to shift Allen Craig to the outfield to offset the loss of Beltran, and the inability of Cincinnati to do the same for the likely departure of Choo, St. Louis has time on it’s side in determining how to address their shortstop deficiency. There’s no reason to commit long term this Winter when the benefit of the upgrade won’t be season until next postseason.

Craig Goldstein is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Craig's other articles. You can contact Craig by clicking here

28 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

mblthd

Wong to 2B, Carpenter to 3B, Freese to bench

Nov 11, 2013 04:00 AM
rating: 3
 
Behemoth

Beginning of May: Freese to 3rd, Carpenter to 2nd, Wong to AAA.

Nov 11, 2013 05:27 AM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Ben Carsley
BP staff

What did Cameron Diaz do to you?

Nov 11, 2013 05:07 AM
 
BP staff member Craig Goldstein
BP staff

If i cant make hot off the press topical references without you jumping down my throat, well, I dont know why I even bother.

Nov 11, 2013 07:09 AM
 
mblthd

Now I know how Joan of Arc felt

Nov 11, 2013 07:51 AM
rating: 11
 
stuckinLF

Nice Smiths reference. plus plus plus

Nov 12, 2013 21:25 PM
rating: 0
 
juiced

The cubs have too many needs to justify gutting their farm system for one player, even a David Price. And it's unrealistic to suggest that LA would give up six cost controlled years of Zac Lee for a sliver of ARam's injury riddled decline

Nov 11, 2013 07:34 AM
rating: 1
 
BP staff member Craig Goldstein
BP staff

Ramirez had been healthy in the two years prior to this one and had produced great numbers at the plate. Add in that the third base market has tumbleweeds blowing through it and I dont think its a stretch. Thats a win now organization and they'd be getting two years of Aramis.

Suffice it to say I disagree with you on the Cubs. I think they'll plug plenty of holes with talent in the near future and their biggest weakness is in the rotation. It obviously depends on the haul, but getting an established front of the rotation arm would be a boon, in my opinion.

Nov 11, 2013 07:40 AM
 
mblthd

Aramis' healthy 2011-2012 doesn't count in 2014. In 2013 he became a shot horse, and shot horses don't ever get un-shot.

Nov 11, 2013 07:49 AM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Craig Goldstein
BP staff

I don't think it's fair to criticize someone's injury history and then completely ignore their apparent health for two out of the last three years. Also, your dead horse produced 32% better than league average last year (132 wRC+). That puts him sixth (by that metric) in the league for 3Bs if the minimum is 350 PA. I'm not saying he's the best thing since sliced bread. He's not, as his defensive issues are very real. He's also a terrific hitter, and if 1-2 years of him keeps them from a 3 year deal with Uribe or someone else...it's not inconceivable. It's definitely a long-term loss for LA, but they don't have to treat the long-term like most other teams.

Nov 11, 2013 08:12 AM
 
mblthd

If Aramis manages to limp into the batter's box 350 times next year, I'll eat my hat [reaches for salt, wonders if maybe mustard might go well with hat, etc]...

Nov 11, 2013 09:46 AM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Craig Goldstein
BP staff

That's fair. I by no means guarantee his health going forward but I also think it behooves us to look at a three year sample of health instead of just last year. Especially since it wasn't a catastrophic injury that derailed his season. I don't intend to ignore your point regarding his health though. It's a legitimate concern.

Nov 11, 2013 10:23 AM
 
mblthd

It wouldn't be the first hat I've eaten

Nov 11, 2013 12:03 PM
rating: 2
 
juiced

The Cubs aren't likely at all to contend for anything over the next two years where Price is under contractual control. Makes no sense at all to give up the substantial package of controllable minor league/young players that it'd take to get Price. Aramis is getting very long in the tooth, plays lousy D, and is coming off an injury riddled season. Conceding that the Dodgers are playing "for now"
dealing Zac Lee for ARam is an opportunity loss at a minimum as he could be dangled for a better player.

Nov 14, 2013 10:44 AM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Craig Goldstein
BP staff

I guess I think they're closer than you might, and that adding Price would be a huge step towards competing. Again, it depends on what the overall package would be but there are conditions where I think it's the right move, even with a substantial prospect package heading the other direction.

As for Aramis and the Dodgers, I've expressed my thoughts in other comments so I won't repeat them here, other than to say that the 3rd base market is so unbelievably weak, that I think they'd at least consider it. I understand if you disagree. It's not a slam dunk, but I don't think it's absurd either.

Nov 14, 2013 11:05 AM
 
Pinson

Ditto, mblthd. -Freese = +. Craig, the Cards may have had the best run differential, but they ranked 25th in OPS against lefties, only .001 above 27th or 28th. All the Sox had to do was start a good lefty to take Wainwright out of the Series and put the Cards down two. And the Cards had no depth at all on the hitting side: the worst bench of 10 teams in playoffs and one of the worst in the majors. Sign or trade for (b/c no free agent really fits the need) a good RH-hitting SS and they address both problems in one proverbial fell swoop.

Nov 11, 2013 07:44 AM
rating: 1
 
BP staff member Craig Goldstein
BP staff

I don't have a real problem with that set up, but it is also something they could do in the middle of the season whenever they want. That essentially supports the "stand pat" idea, because it doesn't involve any external moves. I don't think it's the worst idea to see if Freese can get off to a hot start (if only to increase his trade value), knowing that they have this option as a fallback.

Nov 11, 2013 08:14 AM
 
BrianGunn
(439)

The Cards had virtually the same personnel in 2012 and had one of the very BEST teams vs. LHP. Of course, you can't discount an entire season's worth of PA's, but I feel the team's deflated performance against lefties was akin to its inflated performance with RISP. That is to say, a team with Craig, Holliday, and Molina shouldn't have nearly as much trouble against southpaws going forward.

And I'm not sure it's quite fair to say they had no depth at all in hitting, if only b/c Craig was down due to a fluke injury. Normally you'd have expected Adams and Tavares off the bench. In fact, in the regular season Adams was one of the best pinch hitters in all of baseball.

Nov 11, 2013 09:29 AM
rating: 1
 
Blackmax

How much does it matter if the Pirates start the season with Tabata in right and Gaby Sanchez at first? Is it not essential that they find someone with a bat to replace Jones, Morneau,and Byrd?

Nov 11, 2013 12:30 PM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Craig Goldstein
BP staff

Am I wrong in seeing that Garrett Jones is in his 3rd year of arbitration? I would role with him for now, as he was pretty solid in 2012 before a rough 2013. I agree it's not a strongsuit, but they have Polanco waiting in the wings, and I think another mid-rotation starter, in a relatively cheap/short deal would be a better option. Corner OF could absolutely be an issue though.

Nov 11, 2013 15:18 PM
 
Blackmax

You are correct, but he's due for a raise and seems to be in decline. My guess is that he is gone. But thanks for yet another interesting column.

Nov 11, 2013 19:05 PM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Craig Goldstein
BP staff

Thanks for contributing to the discussion. You may well be right, but I think they give him the first of the season at least (if bringing back Byrd isn't in the cards).

Nov 11, 2013 19:56 PM
 
MikeJordan23

I think with having both Adams and Craig for only one position, it would probably be best for the Cardinals to trade one of them and one of their plethora of power pitchers to the Rangers for either Profar or Andrus. Preferably, Profar.

Nov 11, 2013 16:25 PM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Craig Goldstein
BP staff

I think Craig can and will play RF early on in 2014, which would leave room for both players, as long as Beltran goes elsewhere.

Nov 11, 2013 18:07 PM
 
TheRescue

Assuming they don't deal the farm for a Tulo or the like, I'd just like to see the Cardinals pickup a good bat off the bench. I don't think they need any other sweeping changes, as I'd be just fine with Adams at 1st, Craig in right, and Taveras coming up to play center. I know most don't think he stays in CF, but I think most things I've read say he can handle it these first couple of years. Another bat to add to the bench, though, with Freese, Jay, and the like would be nice.

Nov 11, 2013 18:14 PM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Craig Goldstein
BP staff

Absolutely, that should be an option. I didn't mean that they should do *nothing* all offseason, but mostly in regards to not making a big move for the sake of making a move. Their bench was exposed in a major way in the playoffs and I full expect them to address it with a combination of prospects, prospects forcing veterans to the bench and a few low-key free agent signings (all this assuming they don't land a big fish like Tulo). Great point!

Nov 11, 2013 18:17 PM
 
Behemoth

It does give them a pretty poor outfield defensively. Probably all of Craig, Holliday and Taveras (as a CF) would be below average.

Nov 12, 2013 05:34 AM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Craig Goldstein
BP staff

Indeed it would, though I assume Jay opens the season in center, not that that helps much. As bad as the outfield D might be, I think they make the trade-off for the lineup it gives them.

Nov 12, 2013 06:40 AM
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article Minor League Update: A... (11/11)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article One Move: American Lea... (11/08)
Next Column >>
Premium Article One Move: American Lea... (11/12)
Next Article >>
Fantasy Offseason Prev... (11/11)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Premium Article Minor League Update: Games of Thursday, May ...
Premium Article What You Need to Know: Bummed!
Premium Article The Prospectus Hit List: Friday, May 22
West Coast By Us: Day 1: In The Land Where E...
Premium Article Rubbing Mud: The Quarter-Season Odds Report
West Coast By Us: Taco the Town
Going Yard: The Near Perfection of Pederson

MORE FROM NOVEMBER 11, 2013
Premium Article Prospects Will Break Your Heart: Texas Range...
Premium Article Baseball Therapy: The Cost of a Cost-Control...
Fantasy Offseason Preview
Premium Article Minor League Update: AFL and Winter League R...
Internet Baseball Awards: National League To...
Internet Baseball Awards: American League To...
The Week in Quotes: November 4-11

MORE BY CRAIG GOLDSTEIN
2013-11-15 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Team Preview: Chicago White Sox
2013-11-14 - Premium Article One Move: National League East
2013-11-13 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Team Preview: Texas Rangers
2013-11-11 - Premium Article One Move: National League Central
2013-11-07 - Premium Article One Move: National League West
2013-11-05 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Team Preview: Houston Astros
2013-10-29 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Freestyle: Matt Adams: First Base Fi...
More...

MORE ONE MOVE
2013-11-14 - Premium Article One Move: National League East
2013-11-12 - Premium Article One Move: American League West
2013-11-11 - Premium Article One Move: National League Central
2013-11-08 - Premium Article One Move: American League Central
2013-11-07 - Premium Article One Move: National League West
2013-11-06 - One Move: American League East
More...

INCOMING ARTICLE LINKS
2013-11-14 - Premium Article One Move: National League East
2013-11-12 - Premium Article One Move: American League West