CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: NL... (10/09)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: NL... (10/09)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: NL... (10/10)
Next Article >>
Advance Scouting Serie... (10/09)

October 9, 2013

Playoff Prospectus

ALDS Game Four Recap: Tigers 8, A's 6

by Sam Miller

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.

a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

Guess the MLB.com headline!

  • A-Jax, Max Help Send ALDS Back For Final Act
  • Max Effort, Max Results In Tigers Stunner
  • A’s Held Down By Tigers’ Maximum Security
  • Odd Series Gets Even, As Scherzer Has A’s Number
  • ALDS Goin’, Goin’, Back, Back To Cali

The hardest part of managing in the playoffs has to be trying to figure out exactly how good the ace starter is going to be as a reliever. Clearly, Max Scherzer is a better pitcher than Drew Smyly or Joaquin Benoit. But is he a better pitcher in relief, having come out of the pen just once since 2008? Is he a better pitcher on short rest, even if he’s only asked to throw a couple dozen pitches? If he is a better pitcher in relief, and he is a better pitcher on short rest, how much better is he? Good enough to stay in even after putting on five of the first eight batters?

With the bases loaded, nobody out, a pair of left-handed batters coming up and a one-run game in the eighth, Jim Leyland stuck with his reliever, Max Scherzer. It was an aggressive move (or non-move), but it wasn’t universally praised:

Leyland isn’t afraid to go to Benoit in the eighth, though. The closer came into the eighth inning of Game 1 (with two outs). On September 23rd, he came into the eighth (with one out). He had a five-out save in August and, since becoming the closer for good in early June, has entered no fewer than six games in the eighth inning. Phil Coke had a two-inning save for Jim Leyland last October. Leyland’s not, then, averse to using his closer in the eighth inning. He is averse, we might imagine, to taking out the better pitcher to do so.

Scherzer made him look good, which isn’t the same as making it the right move, but will suffice for Leyland’s purposes. Scherzer struck out Josh Reddick with the bases loaded on a changeup inside. The ridiculousness of that pitch requires a little backstory. First, here’s the pitch chart:Scherzer threw six fastballs in a row, all at about the same latitude, before throwing, on a 3-2 count where a walk would tie the game, a changeup off the plate inside and low. Reddick was rightfully shocked (and swung), but particularly shocked considering this:

Scherzer and Reddick have faced each other 14 times and Scherzer has never thrown him that pitch. He’s never thrown a changeup inside to Reddick; he never thrown any pitch as far inside as that pitch; and, for that matter, he’s really only thrown two pitches anywhere near that location, and it’s reasonable to suspect that one or both might have been a mistake. Shoot, the location of this pitch was a mistake; Scherzer was trying to go outside, and yanked it. We don’t know what goes on in the minds of hitters, really. But we can safely assume that Josh Reddick has accepted that he doesn’t need to look for a changeup inside.

The Leyland move paid off. Bob Melvin’s moves in the inning didn’t. Once Seth Smith was walked intentionally to load the bases, Melvin had three shots to get at least one run in; two would have been nice, but one was absolutely essential. Had Jim Leyland pulled Scherzer for Drew Smyly (warm in the bullpen), then Derek Norris, Chris Young, and Alberto Callaspo might have been called upon as pinch-hitters, but with Scherzer in the game Melvin could keep his three scheduled left-handed batters in the game. Except this:

  • Josh Reddick: 4.9 PA/K against RHP, career
  • Stephen Vogt: 6.0 PA/K against RHP, career
  • Eric Sogard: 8.2 PA/K against RHP, career

and the switch-hitter on the bench:

  • Alberto Callaspo: 10.9 PA/K against RHP, career

It would have made all sorts of sense to pinch-hit for Reddick. (For what it’s worth, Reddick had struck out in seven of 13 previous plate appearances against Scherzer. Probably not worth much; probably something Melvin looked at, though.) It’s almost certain Callaspo puts the ball in play; the Tigers, at least against Reddick, appeared willing to trade two outs for a run, so almost anything would get the run in. Reddick struck out.

Then it would have made sense to pinch-hit for Vogt. The A’s are carrying three catchers, after all; if not to get a better bat on the field in a late high-leverage situation, then why? Again, Callaspo would be a much better bet to get the run home. Vogt struck out.

Finally, Callaspo pinch-hit for Sogard, by which point the value of contact wasn’t so great. Callaspo hit the ball hard and could have been the hero, but his skill set, the one thing he does exceptionally on offense, matters disproportionately in situations that the A’s had face four and two minutes earlier.

This game will be remembered, though, for one reason: the call upholding Victor Martinez’s game-tying home run in the seventh. Here’s the video,

which seems to contain an optical illusion as the ball soars away from Reddick and toward the fans. In an early frame, it seems clear the ball is going to land short of the wall;

in a later frame, it seems more clear that the ball would have (and did) land over the yellow line, or at least on the yellow line.

I’d have upheld the home run call, and I wouldn't have spent much time on it. Looks to me like the fan probably kept Reddick from catching it, but "it" was a ball over the wall, where fans are allowed to grab. What was fascinating to me was that the A’s radio team, to which I was listening, was certain that the wrong call was made. Not just “what a shame, smdh” but, like, talking about what rules the commissioner’s office needs to implement to keep this from happening again, discussion about whether Bob Melvin might be playing this game under protest, and such. Literally, Ray Fosse wants to bar the crew chief from the replay room because of this call. I listened to the final three innings of this game feeling that the A’s had been badly taken advantage of. Then I saw the play. Radio is the best way to consume the game, in my opinion, unless you want to have anything approaching an accurate description of it.

Gary Darling’s home run call was suspiciously aggressive.

Settle down, son.

Headline answer:

In the hierarchy of awful headlines, the only thing worse than bad pun is rhyme.

Sam Miller is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Sam's other articles. You can contact Sam by clicking here

Related Content:  Oakland Athletics,  Playoffs,  Detroit Tigers,  Alds

21 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

BP staff member Jason Wojciechowski
BP staff

Ray Fosse's homerism is different from, say, Hawk Harrelson's only in kind, not in degree. Any reasonably close call should always go Oakland's way. I love him and would knock back a few beers with him any day, but yeah an objective description of the events is not what I'd turn to him for.

Oct 08, 2013 21:14 PM

that was a rather diplomatic way of putting it
guess that's why you're the writer and not me....

Oct 09, 2013 11:14 AM
rating: 0

So many of the hometown announcers are terribly biased or omit criticism of their own players.

I feel like they are insulting their own fans intelligence.

Oct 08, 2013 21:21 PM
rating: 2

That being said I find Hawk Harrelson to be quite colorful and interesting to listen too.

Oct 08, 2013 21:22 PM
rating: -2

Ajax, Max get fat stacks

Oct 08, 2013 22:45 PM
rating: 2

When I was a kid and used to listen to Ernie Harwell call Tigers games on the radio, when a hitter would get a base hit on a broken bat, he would say, in his smooth, eloquent manner, that the bad had died a hero. The reason I bring this up is Austin Jackson's signal that brought him the game winning RBI and turned the tide in the series was on a broken bat. That bad died a super-hero.

Oct 09, 2013 05:29 AM
rating: 3

Looking at the animated image of the ball coming in, am I the only one who thinks it appears to change trajectories halfway? I guess it must be an illusion, maybe caused by the camera motion, but it really looks as if a bizarre gust of wind takes hold of it 5 feet from the wall.

Oct 09, 2013 06:59 AM
rating: 0
BP staff member Sam Miller
BP staff

I said that!

Oct 09, 2013 07:57 AM

the camera stops panning, that's why the angle of descent appears to change. I think.

Oct 09, 2013 11:30 AM
rating: 2

It almost looks like the fan trying to catch it uses some sort of weird power to bring the ball into his hands.

Oct 09, 2013 15:04 PM
rating: 0
BP staff member Dan Brooks
BP staff

I feel like I would have gone with:
"A-Jax, Max, Axe A's; Send ALDS Back to LAX for final acts."

LAX is close to Oakland, right? Right? =(

Oct 09, 2013 07:03 AM

The ball was over the line, he wouldn't have caught it anyway, the fans should be ejected from the game for reaching over the railing, a vertically wider shot would probably eliminate the illusion (or move it earlier in the flight), but it never hurts to have someone else to blame when you lose.

Detroit's radio guys are homers, but they do rag on poor play by the home team and usually fairly describe what they see as poor calls. Jim Price stating that a called strike on the opponents was a "good call" means we got one we didn't deserve.

Oct 09, 2013 07:45 AM
rating: 0

I would like to know exactly what the rules say about fan interference, because that ball had clearly not yet reached the wall when the fan made contact with it.

Oct 09, 2013 08:07 AM
rating: 1

I don't think MLB should allow stadiums to be built so that a yellow line and replay review are necessary to call a home run. The line was too low. Reddick and many other others have a good chance to catch that ball if the fan does not lean into the "phantom zone." Raise the wall and pull it in if needed.

Oct 09, 2013 08:40 AM
rating: 0

Well, it needs to work both ways.

i don't think there should be any "yellow lies," period. Stadiums shouldn't be built where players can reach over the fence and pull back a home run. The line wasn't too low, the wall was.

Either the ball should be in play, or it's gone.

Oct 10, 2013 06:16 AM
rating: 0

I have no idea why Austin Jackson was credited for by the MLB headline writer for helping with that win. He was 1 for 4 with three strikeouts, no runs, 1 RBI. The RBI was on a broken bat single that was booted by the right fielder. He's played poorly this series.

Oct 09, 2013 09:02 AM
rating: 1

I think it's basically because his RBI just happened to be the one that put the Tigers ahead. Sure, if they hadn't scored three more in the eighth that may not have mattered but we'll just ignore that.

Oct 09, 2013 10:10 AM
rating: 0

under current definition, the Ajax single provided the Game winning RBI, as it put them ahead to stay, but Drakos is right that without the later runs scored, they probably don't win this game.

Oct 09, 2013 12:43 PM
rating: 0

Nope, the "game inning RBI" was abolished several years ago because it was meaningless.

Oct 10, 2013 06:18 AM
rating: 0
Randy Brown

Lots of consternation about the MLB headline. Everyone needs to relax.

Oct 09, 2013 10:02 AM
rating: 1

SAm - I think the A's radio team was caught up in 2B umpire Mike DiMuro putting up both arms and signaling 'interference'.

Oct 09, 2013 10:04 AM
rating: 1
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: NL... (10/09)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: NL... (10/09)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: NL... (10/10)
Next Article >>
Advance Scouting Serie... (10/09)

Premium Article What You Need to Know: June 2, 2015
Premium Article The Call-Up: Manny Banuelos
Fantasy Rounders: Split the Bit
Premium Article Painting the Black: #HugWatch2015: The Hugge...
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: They're No Angels
Premium Article Rubbing Mud: The Cole Hamels Decision
Premium Article The Call-Up: Miguel Sano

Advance Scouting Series: Gerrit Cole
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: NLDS Game Five Preview: ...
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: ALDS Game Four Recap: Re...
The Lineup Card: 8 Memorable Manager Decisio...

2013-10-11 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 3...
2013-10-10 - Pebble Hunting: The Season in Pain
2013-10-10 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 3...
2013-10-09 - Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: ALDS Game Four Recap: Ti...
2013-10-09 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 3...
2013-10-08 - Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: ALDS Game Three Recap: A...
2013-10-08 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 3...

2013-10-11 - Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: ALCS Preview: Tigers vs....
2013-10-10 - Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: ALDS Game Five Preview: ...
2013-10-10 - Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: NLDS Game Five Recap: Ca...
2013-10-09 - Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: ALDS Game Four Recap: Ti...
2013-10-09 - Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: NLDS Game Five Preview: ...
2013-10-09 - Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: ALDS Game Four Recap: Re...
2013-10-08 - Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: NLDS Game Four Recap: Do...