Premium and Super Premium Subscribers Get a 20% Discount at MLB.tv!
February 21, 2013
Getting the Platoon Advantage
There was a time, not too long ago, when my bench spots were all occupied by pitchers. The benefit to that was obvious—I could stick lower-end starting pitchers there to take advantage of quality matchups and stash relief pitchers that are good handcuffs to potentially shaky closers. However, with the popularization of deeper benches and daily transactions/lineup changes, my thinking on this has shifted slightly. There is now no shortage of leagues out there with benches that go five players deep or larger, and the changes in format haven’t led to a different way of thinking about how best to deploy a fantasy bench. Until now.
The exercises below show the benefits of using one of your bench spots specifically to platoon one of your final offensive players, using the 2012 season as the example. The guidelines of the exercises are simple. For each scenario, I took two players who were drafted outside the top 200 last pre-season and set a fixed schedule of when one would be in the lineup over the other—leaving no room for subjectivity. The only exceptions to this were when one of the players was not in the starting lineup (out) or one of the players was participating in a doubleheader (in). Then, I went back through the 2012 game logs to determine the actual statistics and value earned out of this “alternative arrangement.” But before we dive in, we have to set a baseline of value for the roster spots.
Let’s assume, for the purpose of this demonstration, that this owner would have gone with a more standard strategy of taking one full-time offensive player and one flier on a starting pitcher with his/her two final draft picks. Let’s also assume that we’re dealing with a 12-14 team mixed league with five bench spots. The 200th player drafted in a league this size yields a positive return on investment if he earns $4 over the course of the season. Let’s even say that the owner is particularly prescient and is able to squeeze $6 of value out of the starting pitcher by sitting him for a few harsh matchups; even this brings us to a $10 overall value for the two picks.
Now it’s time to see how the arrangements stack up. We’ll start first with a platoon based on home ballparks, and then move to one based on actual platoon splits.
Let’s dive into the arrangement with a lower level of difficulty: a platoon of advantageous home ballparks. There are a couple of parks to that exaggerate the statistics of the players that call them home. For this exercise, I chose one player who plays half of his games at Coors Field and one who plays half of his games at Chase Field. Dexter Fowler went into 2012 with a decent amount of buzz, but still saw his ADP sitting at 214 overall. Jason Kubel was generating similar sleeper hype, as he was going from a park that stifled left-handed power to one of the gentlest environments for it. Kubel’s ADP was just a few picks ahead of Fowler’s, at 210 overall.
Now, before we go any further into this part, let me clarify one thing. In choosing players for the home/road split, I put much more weight into park factors and team performance than individual performance, as there tends to be more noise in an individual player season. So, while Fowler didn’t have a huge split in 2011 (811 OPS at Coors versus 782 OPS at home), I would expect his split to be in line with the team split (OPS 113 points higher at Coors) going forward. Finding the right player, unless his skill set doesn’t translate to being elevated by an high-offense home park, is less important than finding the right park.
Based on expected performance, I set the pre-season schedule at the following:
When you use this formula to determine playing time, the final result of the lineup position over the course of the 2012 season was a .290 average with 31 homers, 98 RBI, 107 runs scored and 6 steals in 582 at bats. Here’s how it broke down by each player involved:
Matt Holliday ended the 2012 season as the 9th best OF for fantasy and earned approximately $18 in a league of this size. The combination of Fowler and Kubel (each of whom finished outside the top 40 outfielders in 2012) provided $19 in value.
Net profit: $9
Conclusion: Overall, this was certainly a success, but not a blow-away success. And, you’d expect this because it’s both an easier strategy to identify and because players who play in advantageous home parks are generally overpriced on draft day.
Possibilities for 2013: The nice element of this strategy is that there are always new players that have favorable home parks when the ones who have good seasons become too expensive. If I’m trying to pull off this arrangement in 2013, I’d be looking at players like Tyler Colvin, Lance Berkman, Ryan Ludwick,, or Cody Ross. And, if you’re looking to try it in a deeper league, there’s always Nolan Reimold and, dare I say, Travis Hafner.
The second exercise, which takes advantage of statistically relevant player splits between facing right-handed and left-handed pitching, requires a little more attention to detail. While it’s easy to set your lineup for days at a time using the ballpark split, when you’re dealing with opposing starting pitchers, the scheduling can get a little fickler. What I looked for here were players who had a career-long track record of hitting significantly better when given the platoon advantage.
In this case, I found two players who were both being drafted outside the top 250 in 2012. Garrett Jones has been so terrible against southpaws that it has overshadowed his impressive ability to hit right-handers. Case in point, his career 852 OPS against righties is higher than the 2012 marks for Paul Goldschmidt, Jay Bruc,e and Adam Jones, while his 590 OPS against lefties is lower than Rey Ordonez’s career mark. Cody Ross seemed like the perfect platoon partner, as his 926 OPS versus left-handers for his career was more than 200 points better than his mark against righties. Last March, Jones had an ADP of 279 overall, while Ross was being taken a couple of rounds later at 312 overall.
Based on their previous history of performance, I set the pre-season schedule at the following*:
*The only wrinkle in this plan was that Ross went on the disabled list in mid-May and missed a month of the season. To account for this, I replaced Ross with another lefty-masher who was widely available on waiver wires at the time: Scott Hairston. Hairston played the Ross role exactly, with no derivation from the original plan.
When you use this formula to determine playing time, the final result of the lineup position over the course of the 2012 season was a .277 average with 43 homers, 128 RBI, 99 runs scored and two steals in 617 at-bats. Here’s how it broke down by each player involved:
As you can tell, this one is a little more jarring. Hamilton ended the 2012 season as the fourth-best outfielder for fantasy and earned approximately $30 in a league of this size. The combination of Ross, Hairston, and Jones (each of whom also finished outside the top 40 outfielders in 2012) provided $27 in value.
Net profit: $17
Conclusion: Now this I would consider a huge success. In the end, not only was it cheaper to use platoon splits to form a “super outfielder” than the ballpark splits, but the strategy also provided more than double the profit. And, the best part is that this strategy is so underutilized that even these exact two players are available at similar ADPs this spring as they were last spring.
Possibilities for 2013: If you want, you can do the same Ross/Jones platoon without paying a premium for it. But, if you’re looking for other names to go with, try Jonny Gomes or Scott Hairston against southpaws. And, for the strong side of the platoon, while no one’s quite as perfect for the role as Jones, there’s always Adam Lind or Matt Joyce—who will likely cost less.