CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article The Keeper Reaper: Sec... (01/11)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Mock Dra... (01/06)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Fantasy Beat: The Risk... (01/13)
Next Article >>
Premium Article The Keeper Reaper: Out... (01/11)

January 11, 2012

Fantasy Beat

Expected Gains From Dollar Players

by Jason Collette

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

Nobody goes to the grocery store hell bent on purchasing ramen noodles or Keystone Light, but sometimes our budgets dictate it. We know we need to go grocery shopping for certain things, but sudden plans such as drinks with friends after work cut into our budget and subsequent spending habits for the week. We start the week with good intentions of taking our lunches to work all five days and coming straight home, but three diner stops and one happy hour later, and suddenly cash is short for a few days. Suddenly bad noodles and watered-down beer does not look so bad while counting down the days until the next paycheck.

Fantasy baseball, unlike life, only guarantees you two paychecks, and they come in two separate installments. One comes at the start of draft day with a finite budget of anything from $26 to $300 depending on your league rules. Once that money is out, it is out. The other comes in the form of a Free Agent Acquisition Budget (FAAB) that is anywhere from 30 to 40 percent of the draft day check. There are many strategies employed by drafters in a budget, but all auctions come to the same decision point at some point in a draft: is it worth going to your max bid on Player X that will put you in dollar days? There is a small, abstract study of this in the latest Baseball Forecaster from BaseballHQ that I read on my latest business trip to Wisconsin, but I wanted to take a deeper look into numbers here to show the risk/reward of dollar days.

Dollar days can leave you feeling both empowered and powerless. You can get a rush by trying to find the next Ben Zobrist for $1 as Brad Evans did in 2009, or watch as some Rays-homer like me jumps your $1 Zobrist bid in Tout Wars that same season because I had an extra dollar to spend and had a middle infield spot open. Some drafters feel quite confident in their abilities to mine talent in the end game while others prefer to avoid it as they enjoy the extra bit of end game leverage that I was able to exercise to get Zobrist in 2009. Most also look at their dollar day players as their first cuts when the FAAB process begins. That line of thought makes it imperative for you to both be able to identify the productive pickups from the non-productive and outbid your competition.

Frankly, entering into dollar days is a strategy we all have to decide whether we want to employ or leave in our book bag at the draft table. Last year, I went there and left the auction with Adam Moore as my second catcher, Brandon Wood as my middle infielder, and Will Rhymes as my utility player, while eventual Tout Wars AL champ Larry Schechter left with Brendan Ryan and Doug Fister. My three players went on to earn -$11 in value while his two made a profit of $21 for him on the season. You win some, you lose some, but what does recent history tell us about players purchased in dollar days?

To examine this, I employed the aid of USA Today’s Steve Gardner and some handy Google searching to dig up the results of the last six LABR (League of Alternative Baseball Reality) drafts in both the 12-team AL and the 13-team NL only leagues.  In all, I found 564 players that had been acquired in one of those drafts for $1. No, Jeff Mathis was not drafted for that price every season, but he was drafted for $1 in every odd-numbered year, so adjust your 2012 dollar values accordingly.

In all, just 180 of the players returned as little as one dollar in profit in the season they were drafted, leaving 384 players who failed to earn their purchase. Dollar values were obtained using the Historical StallValue System Dollar Values from 2006-2010, as well as last season’s values (for consistency purposes) assuming a 70/30 hitting/pitching split and weighing each of the ten standard scoring categories evenly.

Of the 180 players that turned profits for their owners in a season, 46 percent of them were pitchers, which was double the total of any other drafted position.

POSITION

COUNT

PERCENTAGE

MEAN PROFIT

HIGHEST

Pitcher

83

46%

$6

$24 (Franklin)

Outfielder

42

23%

$7

$17(Diaz/McLouth)

Catcher

14

8%

$3

$5 (Kendall)

Second Base

13

7%

$4

$7 (Miles)

Shortstop

12

7%

$8

$26 (Zobrist)

First Base

10

6%

$6

$21 (Trumbo)

Third Base

6

3%

$7

$22 (Cantu)


Ryan Franklin was a surprise to everyone in 2009 when he saved 38 games with a 1.92 ERA for the Cardinals that season. He was coming off a season in which he saved 17 games for them with a 3.55 ERA but had a 4.72 FIP along with a 51-to-30 strikeout-to-walk ratio and 10 home runs. All he did was come out and defy the regression gods by stranding even more runners than he did in 2008 and posting a three percent HR/FB ratio after six seasons worth of rates that were nine percent or higher.

Mark Trumbo was the most recent top profiter, mostly due to timing. LABR is the first of the expert leagues to draft, and their draft was in early March when Kendrys Morales had yet to be ruled out for the 2011 season.  In 2007, Jorge Cantu was so bad that he was traded by the Devil Rays to the Reds for two players that never made it to the majors, only to be released by the Reds after the season. He was acquired by the Marlins and placed in a pitcher’s park, yet went on to have the best year of his career.  Ben Zobrist found success in 2009 only after a knee injury to Akinori Iwamura opened up regular playing time at second base, which he never relinquished. In the outfield, Matt Diaz provided strong value despite only getting 425 at-bats, while McLouth had a career year in his third full season in the majors, going 20/20 and hitting .276 while scoring 113 runs for the Pirates. Jason Kendall and Aaron Miles only had modest gains from their positions and were more in line with the mean profits at those positions.

Conversely, pitchers carry a large amount of risk because their losses were more dominant than their gains. Of the 384 players to lose value from the player pool, 56 percent of them were pitchers. That was four times more than any of the other positions.

POSITION

COUNT

PERCENTAGE

MEAN LOSS

HIGHEST

Pitcher

215

56%

-$4

-$10(D.Cabrera)

Outfielder

52

14%

-$2

-$5(C. Carter)

Catcher

40

10%

-$2

-$5(J. Flores)

Second Base

23

6%

-$3

$-6 (Emaus)

Shortstop

19

5%

-$3

-$5(E.Cabrera)

First Base

18

5%

-$3

-$6(A. Marte)

Third Base

17

4%

-$3

-$5(J. Castro)

The silver lining here is that the larger losses are concentrated in the pitching area, as more than two-thirds of the players that lost at least $5 in profits were pitchers. Additionally, it is unlikely that these players remained on anyone’s roster over the course of the entire season, thus allowing those owners to replace their draft day mistake. Who among us has not rostered Andy Marte at least once in our history, hoping that this would finally be the season he would do something with an opportunity? Conversely, if you ever drafted Daniel Cabrera, you had to know what you were getting into.

We can view the separate groups as one to create a larger overall sample size and see which positions show the best chance of turning a profit and which ones carry the most risk.

POSITION

COUNT

PERCENTAGE

MEAN PROFIT

TOTAL VALUE

Pitcher

298

53%

-$1

-$292

Outfielder

82

15%

$3

$208

Catcher

66

12%

-$1

-$92

Second Base

31

6%

$1

$38

Shortstop

30

5%

$0

$4

First Base

29

5%

-$1

-$23

Third Base

28

5%

$0

$1

In all, the 564 players in this sample size combined to produce just $408 in value, or just $0.72 per player. Only six percent of the player pool (36 players in all) produced double-digit dollar values in a given season, and 31 of them returned double-digits profits to their owners.  It has become a running joke in Tout Wars AL to make fun of good friend Jeff Erickson’s shit-tee outfield that he somehow ends up with at every draft, but the numbers at least show there may indeed be a method to his madness each March.

Consider that 20 percent of the dollar players drafted over the past six drafts delivered exactly what owners paid for them, which should serve as your more realistic baseline for dollar days. Players are four times as likely to return exactly what you paid for them as they are to return massive profits in that season. Much like Ramen noodles and Keystone Light, you are more than likely to get exactly what you paid for.

Jason Collette is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Jason's other articles. You can contact Jason by clicking here

Related Content:  Bad Season

8 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

Jon KK

Thanks Jason! Interesting and enlightening. I need to remember the high percentage of these pitchers who lose value. One further thought: Was there any correlation between players returning at least $1 in value and particular league members? That is, are some people better (or luckier, perhaps) at recognizing productive pickups?

Jan 11, 2012 06:49 AM
rating: 0
 
BP staff member Jason Collette
BP staff

Hi Jon -- I didn't break it down by actual drafter because there was some turnover in the leagues from year to year. I could re-run the numbers for anyone that wanted to see how it broke down for AL & NL if someone needed that type of drill-down.

Jan 11, 2012 06:51 AM
 
BP staff member Michael Jong
BP staff

I take offense, Jason. Ramen is among my top searched items at the grocery store. Got to save somewhere in college life.

Jan 11, 2012 08:13 AM
 
BP staff member Jason Collette
BP staff

Not going to lie...I have 4 packages of it in my pantry right now

Jan 11, 2012 09:17 AM
 
davinhbrown

A bad pitcher can really hurt your team, as opposed to just not helpling. And some truely bad pitchers likely wouldn't have been on the team for very long as mentioned in the article by those who view dollar days as future waiver-wire fodder.

But I wonder of the $1 pitchers who turned a profit - just how many of those were set-up men who got 'lucky' and thrust into a closer's role to earn $$$ for their owners. [whether the pre-season closer was ineffective, hurt, or traded] I'd venture taking those mid-season closers out would alter the #'s.

Conversely, an owner is far less likely to drop his $1 catcher or middle infielder just because there is less replacement level players out there.

Jan 11, 2012 09:35 AM
rating: 1
 
LynchMob

Totally agree ... one big key for me has always been to avoid the "bad pitcher". The way I typically do that is to find the setup men who will earn a couple of bucks ... which is VERY common ... ie. it seems very easy for a good setup man to earn more than $1 of value.

Jan 11, 2012 09:47 AM
rating: 0
 
LynchMob

In my experience, the $1 players who turn a profit are the one that should have had $2 bid on them. In other words, most of the time when I get down to $1 for max bid, I still have players on my sheet who I think are worth $2 or more.

I'd be interested to see what LABR profits have been for $2 players? That seems a "sweet spot" to me ...

Jan 11, 2012 09:50 AM
rating: 1
 
joshturin

Jason, this is a fantastic article & taught me something new, after many yrs playing in serious Roto leagues. Here's what I take away from thi:

1) It is a mistake to fill your 2nd C & MI slots with $1 players--since your chances of finding a Black Swan there are virtually nil (e.g., Jason Kendall, Aaron Miles!)

2) You should plan to fill a P-slot & OF-slot with $1 players at the end of of an auction. The fact that most of these $1 pitchers have the unique potential of returning a seriously negative value is unimportant: (a) if they don't look good in April, they're gone through FAAB; (b) you MUST get lucky to win in Roto--you must try to find the Black Swans--but not Brendan Ryan & Doug Fister--blind shithouse luck ;))

Jan 12, 2012 21:34 PM
rating: 0
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article The Keeper Reaper: Sec... (01/11)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Mock Dra... (01/06)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Fantasy Beat: The Risk... (01/13)
Next Article >>
Premium Article The Keeper Reaper: Out... (01/11)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Fantasy Article Fantasy Players to Avoid: Starting Pitchers
Fantasy Infographic: Starting Pitchers
Fantasy Article Dynasty League Positional Rankings: Top 175 ...
Premium Article Rumor Roundup: Diamondbacks Third Baseman is...
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: The Bad Bullpen Teams ...
Prospectus Feature: A.J. Preller's Offseason...
Premium Article Raising Aces: The Eyes of March

MORE FROM JANUARY 11, 2012
Premium Article Future Shock: Do Quad-A Players Exist?
Sobsequy: The Love Song of T.S. Elliot Johns...
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: The Far East-East Coas...
Premium Article The Keeper Reaper: Outfielders for 1/11/12
Premium Article The Keeper Reaper: Second, Short, and Catche...
The BP Wayback Machine: The Best Commissione...

MORE BY JASON COLLETTE
2012-01-20 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: David Ortiz's Strikeout Improv...
2012-01-18 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Profits by Purchase Price and ...
2012-01-13 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: The Risk of Rostering Rookies
2012-01-11 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Expected Gains From Dollar Pla...
2012-01-06 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Mock Draft Update
2012-01-03 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Categories to Target on Draft ...
2011-12-30 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Closers in Waiting
More...

MORE FANTASY BEAT
2012-01-20 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: David Ortiz's Strikeout Improv...
2012-01-18 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Profits by Purchase Price and ...
2012-01-13 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: The Risk of Rostering Rookies
2012-01-11 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Expected Gains From Dollar Pla...
2012-01-06 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Mock Draft Update
2012-01-03 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Categories to Target on Draft ...
2011-12-30 - Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Closers in Waiting
More...