CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article Collateral Damage: Rou... (12/09)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Prospectus Perspective... (12/09)

December 9, 2011

Winter Meetings Update

Collection of Cool

by Jason Parks

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.

a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

The Winter Meetings are a yearly gathering where the baseball industry makes every attempt to recreate the adolescent experience, from the pangs of isolation and insecurity to the power of popular cliques to the masquerade of playing dress-up. The emotional current can be extreme and confusing. The cool kids in the clique are either legitimately cool people or people who have been in the scene long enough to assemble a substantial posse, and as a result appear legitimately cool because they never ride alone. Within the cool clique are several grades of coolness, be it individual or the coolness of the group itself; rarely does a pack of legitimately cool people end up in the same posse for any duration, as the dynamics suggests too many legitimately cool people in the same clique will create a power struggle for the position of the Alpha Cool, a coveted position in any social group. To achieve premium coolness and coolness sustainability, cliques should hold the following dynamic:

The Alpha Cool: This is the coolest member of each social group, a person who can attract other people with coolness into his or her atmosphere. Alpha Cools can be the designated Alpha Cools for several cliques at the same time, holding elite status despite the established dynamic of a particular group. Alpha Cools are usually public figures in their professional life, men or women with a particular shine or exceptional quality. They have large personalities and encourage people to be in the audience of that personality, either because of the personality itself, the platform that personality functions in, the always desirable ability to offer verbose yet compelling fantastical tales while under the influence of alcohol or other controlled substances, or superficial qualities that naturally draw people in, like proper dress, unique or well-presented groom, or innate physical beauty. Alpha Cools burn bright and can quickly burn out, depending on the specific nature of their profession or platform, personality, or in the event of diminished capacity to story-tell or hold liquor in full function.

Second in Command: These are cool people with the potential to operate as an Alpha Cool in smaller, less cool groups. They play an important role ancillary to the actual Alpha Cool of a legitimately cool clique, often as a riffing partner, set-up man/woman, or temporary two-headed monster for those situations that require two Alpha Cools to overwhelm the clique with twice the coolness. When tasked with or if operated beyond their coolness skill set, the SiC can be exposed as a slightly less-than-cool individual, resulting in public awareness of this reality, embarrassment, or downgraded coolness status within a specific clique. SICs are often humorous without being too pungent with their silly; call it a controlled approach to humor and laughter indoctrination. Like a quality number-three starter, SiCs have tremendous value, especially when the price is reasonable and the relationship to the Alpha Cool functional. When the price becomes expensive and the self-evaluation suggests a frontline Alpha Cool status rather than a quality number three, the structure breaks down and the perceived worth or value hinders the performance going forward.

The Innocuous Floater: This is someone with the skills necessary to exist in various groups, free from power grabs or attention demands. These people lack plus qualities but offer enough to stick around; they’re free from intense poison or intense passion. Innocuous floaters rarely attach to one particular clique—hence the floater distinction. Oddly enough, Innocuous Floaters can be offensive, as their mere presence can be annoying when you find them participating (sort of) in various cliques throughout an evening. Innocuous Floaters rarely have names that people remember, forcing a badge peek (assuming they are credentialed for the event), or vague pronoun assignments, possibly even a “man” or a “dude.” Floaters are almost always male, and they are almost always white guys with boring faces. Floaters have value in their volume; most cool cliques run at least five deep, with floaters inflating the posse and enhancing the overall appeal of a group, especially to those with uncool qualities or to other “cool” groups that don’t feature a deep posse.

The Loudmouth/motor-mouth: This is a complicated classification, as a loudmouth/motor-mouth can often take on a more distinguished role within the clique, possibly achieving Alpha Cool status if the loudmouth/motor-mouth happens to have top-quality material to vocalize at loud volumes or high frequency. The obvious downside is annoyance or ridiculousness or an unappealing combo of annoyance and ridiculousness, putting the other members of the clique on the defensive when the unappealing qualities of the loudmouth/motor-mouth overwhelm the established dynamic of the group. L/M-M fill an important role, often acting in a catalytic capacity, pushing the group to a higher intensity and drawing attention to the group. Attention can be positive; attention has a relationship with coolness, so the more intense the discussion and discourse, the cooler the group will appear to those participating in groups that are operating at a lower intensity level [read: a group that isn’t as cool]. L/M-M never last long in any one social group, showing adaptive nomadic behavior, setting up a temporary residence, burning down the house, then moving down the line to build again with another group.

The Incendiary: Often misclassified as L/M-M, the Incendiaries don’t require uncomfortable volume or a loquacious approach to trigger action within a group. Combative types, usually with a passion for alcohol and antagonism, Incendiaries often operate with a skillful grace that the L/M-M lacks, even with the aforementioned passion for drink. A quality Incendiary can assist the Alpha Cools and SiCs by guiding the cool in a positive direction, usually through controlled social antagonism, which in turn gives the leadership of the group material to either develop or refine. It’s not uncommon to find incendiary qualities in the higher-ups on the coolness ladders, but true Incendiaries stay true to the specified role, focusing all attention on timed antagonism and passionate (yet controlled) alcohol consumption.

The Uncool: Every clique needs an uncool member to elevate and accentuate the cooler qualities of the other members of the group. While not technically classified as a “loser,” the Uncool is simply not very cool, lacking the necessary attributes of coolness while possessing the negative attributes that define the Uncool. Rarely do the Uncool actively participate in the discussion, and they never control the pace or direction of a cool group. The Uncool usually have boring faces, and when they do enter into the conversation, they say boring things that make the subsequent conversation more exciting and cool by default. The Uncool shouldn’t be confused with the Innocuous Floater, as the Uncool often attach to an Alpha Cool or a SiC, either as a human laugh track, a fluffer, or a target for abuse to enhance the amusement of the leadership. Uncool people with the most value are the ones who realize and accept their level of cool, taking pride in the role that suits their skill set and extracting enough enjoyment from the overall perception of the group than from his specific role as an uncool fluffer.

 While it’s certainly true that cool cliques can exist in opposition to this dynamic, they rarely offer sustainability; when the roles blur and the coolness is challenged, the coolness suffers. This was a focus on the cool cliques, representing a small percentage of the overall social scene, and not a focus on uncool cliques, which are very common and very unattractive and not worth dissecting because most of them are a mess to begin with. Most of us find ourselves floating in a world where our coolness roles are not defined, and even when they are, our insecurity over the perception of our role is very present in our experience. This is high school with more awareness, which isn’t always a good thing. As I drift through this strange industry gathering, I’ve yet to find the ideal cool clique, coming close on a few occasions, but falling short with each attempt. But if I find one, I guarantee you that I won’t be an active member; well, perhaps if I am the L/M-M or Incendiary, but that’s only if I’m not the Uncool or the Innocuous Floater. Sometimes its better not to know, right? Industry sources suggest I spend too much time thinking about this.   

Jason Parks is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Jason's other articles. You can contact Jason by clicking here

Related Content:  The Who,  Attention

35 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links


This is wonderful writing and strikes a "too true" chord for someone who lived in corporate culture for nearly three decades.

Dec 09, 2011 05:54 AM
rating: 2

I think I'm something like a Second in Command in Training. Who knows if I'll ever get there. I'm like a floater with personal drive.

Dec 09, 2011 06:25 AM
rating: 0

Not quite sure this is the right moment for self-expression, but go ahead...

Dec 10, 2011 15:24 PM
rating: 1

Jason's articles always prompt these philosophical introspections. Don't shoot me for being intrigued enough to apply this taxonomy to my own life.

Dec 11, 2011 06:47 AM
rating: 0

Another awesome piece Jason. Too bad you didn't put some names with the categories. :-)

Dec 09, 2011 06:41 AM
rating: 2

I spend too much time thinking about this, too.

Is Kevin Goldstein an Alpha Cool?

Dec 09, 2011 07:18 AM
rating: 0
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

You will have to ask him that question.

Dec 09, 2011 07:29 AM
BP staff member Kevin Goldstein
BP staff

I'm going to go with Alpha Floater.

Dec 09, 2011 09:08 AM
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

Good call. You can work a lobby like Verducci can work being perfect.

Dec 09, 2011 09:10 AM
Cory Schwartz


Dec 09, 2011 07:36 AM
rating: 0

This article would be so much awesomer if you took a real-life MLB clique and assigned each one.

Dec 09, 2011 07:51 AM
rating: 0
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

It would have been interesting to analyze one specific group, but I also like my friends in baseball and I didn't want to cross the line. My specific clique(s) feature a different dynamic anyway, as most of us can simply be classified as "creeps."

Dec 09, 2011 07:59 AM
Cory Schwartz


Dec 09, 2011 10:16 AM
rating: 2
Scott Gilroy

I can see you as an incendiary. Does classIfying yourself make you automatically uncool?

Dec 09, 2011 08:16 AM
rating: 0
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

I can see that. I guess it just depends on the group. Classifying yourself doesn't automatically make you uncool. Being uncool makes you uncool. Some people are just uncool and that's cool. The uncool are necessary.

Dec 09, 2011 08:26 AM

Is Verducci an alpha cool?


Dec 09, 2011 09:12 AM
rating: 0
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

Verducci doesn't run with a posse. He's just Verducci. More on that in my next WM piece. Should be ready for monday.

Dec 09, 2011 09:15 AM
Richard Bergstrom

I'm sorry, was there a single mention of anything remotely related to baseball after the first sentence? Would it have made the slightest bit of difference if the title of the article was "Bar Scene Update" or "8th Grade Home Room Update"?

Not faulting the writing, just... frustrated.

Dec 09, 2011 09:33 AM
rating: -3
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

Frustrated? Not everything has to be about baseball. If you want baseball, the rest of the articles on the site provide a ton of awesome baseball specific content. Sometimes I like to write about what I see in a baseball setting, and sometimes the baseball part gets excluded from those tales.

Sorry we couldn't make a love connection.

Dec 09, 2011 09:43 AM
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

I would also recommend avoiding my next piece. It's a fictional tale about a writer stalking Tom Verducc at the Winter Meetings. Very little baseball, although I do mention the word baseball a few times.

Dec 09, 2011 09:50 AM

Now THAT is going to be worth reading. I wonder if at the climax you approach him and profess your undying adoration.

If so, that would move you outside of the class system. There's not a class for cojones like that.

Dec 10, 2011 06:20 AM
rating: 0

Oh boy, fanfic ... :-)

Dec 10, 2011 08:09 AM
rating: 0
Richard Bergstrom

Frustrated because as much as I like your writing style but keep disliking what you write about. Believe it or not, I've tried hard.

But if your response is to suggest I stop trying and just avoid reading you, then very well...

Dec 11, 2011 10:57 AM
rating: -1

Lighten up, Francis.

Dec 09, 2011 18:49 PM
rating: 2

Richard Bergstrom is uncool.

Dec 09, 2011 09:43 AM
rating: 5
Cory Schwartz

Sorry, have to add this to this thread, after which I promise I will stop being uncool and just shut up:


Dec 09, 2011 10:18 AM
rating: 0
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

"I'm always home. I'm uncool."

Dec 09, 2011 10:20 AM
Lloyd Cole

now that's what i call Anthropology with a capital A. Robert Ardrey (or Margaret Mead, for that matter) would be proud.

Dec 09, 2011 10:58 AM
rating: 0
The Beef
Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway.

You really needed to put these observations in print? Here's the problem, if you need to read any of this information you're already "uncool." and who calls anyone cool anymore? Time to get out a little and improve your vernacular.

Cool, is taking a daughter of a NL baseball executive to the Dallas Hyatt Regency and convincing her to take a golden shower..... but I wouldn't know anything about that ;)

Dec 09, 2011 18:20 PM
rating: -17
John Carter

Ew. For once something was dinged into hiding that I wish I hadn't read.

Dec 10, 2011 11:18 AM
rating: 6

I gotta tell you "guys', I am starting to put some threads together and this hyper cool piece by jason that seems to have touched a lot of you, is just one more exhibit. I turn on the Philly ESPN Sports station and they are talking about hottie lists. And, they serious calls , no irony here, calls debating the degree of hotness.Go to any radio sport station web site and its all cheerleaders and soccer groupies. Then, listen to these same station's ads. Club Risque and pills and labs for erectile dysfunction. So cool!! The country is going to hell..the sports, the politics, and now this piece of high school psycho babble posing as insight and obviously, based on the comments, a lot of horny but impotent readers are lapping it up. What a country. Where's the beef? At BP , I think the baton has been handed over to a demographic that may be great for the pharmaceutical industry, but clearly a baseball game has become a place to go ogle ,and hopefully, be seen. The game has taken a back seat to some other thirst that I don't think will be quenched by rating posses on their coolness, or lack there of.

Dec 09, 2011 21:12 PM
rating: 0
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

The entire point was that it was high-school psycho-babble, right? Get it? I thought it was rather obvious.

Dec 10, 2011 01:09 AM

So which one is Verducci?

Dec 10, 2011 01:13 AM
rating: 0
Replacement Cat

Thank you, Jason. More, please.

Dec 10, 2011 03:06 AM
rating: 0
John Carter

Thankfully - cool cliques haven't existed in my life since high school. So say I - a long ago loud floater who's coolness bloomed a bit later in life. In fact, I think social maturity was the key ingredient towards coolness level back in the day.

Dec 11, 2011 16:23 PM
rating: 0
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article Collateral Damage: Rou... (12/09)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Prospectus Perspective... (12/09)

The Week in Quotes: March 23-29, 2015
Fantasy Article The Darkhorses: Batting Average and Home Run...
Fantasy Article The Buyer's Guide: Adam Lind
Fantasy Article TTO Scoresheet Podcast: National League Play...
Fantasy Article Fantasy Freestyle: Shadow Auctioneering
Every Team's Moneyball: Philadelphia Phillie...
Every Team's Moneyball: Toronto Blue Jays: I...

Baseball ProGUESTus: Sunset in Flushing
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: More Moore in St. Pete
Transaction Analysis: Wrapping Up the Winter...
Premium Article Prospectus Perspective: A Fresh Start for th...
Premium Article Collateral Damage: Rounding Up the Usual Sus...
Premium Article Fantasy Beat: Early ADP Movers
Premium Article The Keeper Reaper: First, Third, and DH for ...

2011-12-23 - Premium Article Prospects Will Break Your Heart: What Could ...
2011-12-14 - Premium Article Prospects Will Break Your Heart: What Could ...
2011-12-12 - A Visit with Verducci
2011-12-09 - Premium Article Winter Meetings Update
2011-12-01 - Premium Article Prospects Will Break Your Heart: What Could ...
2011-11-23 - Premium Article Prospects Will Break Your Heart: Bear a Star...
2011-11-16 - Premium Article Prospects Will Break Your Heart: One of Thes...