CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Divide and Conquer, AL... (09/02)
<< Previous Column
Divide and Conquer, NL... (08/29)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Divide and Conquer, NL... (09/12)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Prospects Will Break Y... (09/06)

September 6, 2011

Divide and Conquer, NL East

The Curious Case of Javier Vazquez

by Michael Jong

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.

a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

This past week, Florida Marlins starter Javier Vazquez struck out his 2500th batter, inducing a whiff from Lucas Duda to end the bottom of the 6th inning on August 30. This put Vazquez in quite a bit of special company, one of only 22 pitchers since 1961 (and 30 pitchers overall) to reach the 2500-strikeout plateau.

Whenever milestones come up, it is always a good opportunity to look over a player's overall career, and Vazquez's is an intriguing one when considered alongside his strikeout-laden peers. The perception of Vazquez as an excellent pitcher who could reach such a career milestone seems strange after his numerous decent but unspectacular seasons. After all, how many excellent starters are told by their managers that they are not “big-game pitchers” like Ozzie Guillen said to Javy all those years ago? But the perception of him as just an average pitcher (he does have a career record of 160-160) does not match the fact that he was able to reach such a lofty milestone as 2500 strikeouts.

ERA Oddity
Through much of Vazquez's career, he was seen as something of an oddity when it came to his ERA. Despite a very successful career in terms of strikeouts, Vazquez has never been able to suppress runs as well as his peripherals would have suggested; this is most evidenced by a career 4.27 ERA and a consequent 3.94 FIP. Indeed, among the 23 pitchers since 1961 to have reached 2500 strikeouts, Vazquez's ERA+ is the lowest at 104. However, when organized in terms of FIP compared to league average (FIP+, if you will), Vazquez climbs to a more respectable 17th place, ahead of pitchers like Chuck Finley, Jerry Koosman, and Don Sutton. Much of that success must come from his strikeout rate, as Vazquez has the eighth best strikeout rate among these pitchers at 21.2 percent.

Over the course of a season, it may be difficult to separate out pitching performance from defensive issues and other matters that affect pitchers, hence the use of tools such as FIP and Baseball Prospecus's Fair Run Average to attempt to quantify pitching performance. Still, over a long period of time, things like a pitcher's skill in BABIP and his ability with runners on base bears more meaning. Over the course of his career, he has had a significant split between his performance with the bases empty (3.67 FIP) and with runners on base (4.22 FIP), which may be a primary contributor to his ERA-FIP split.  Over such a long period of time, this is likely tied to his skill set and not attributable to an in-season timing oddity.

Among our list of 23 pitchers, Vazquez has thrown the fewest number of innings of them all, tallying only 2802 innings pitched. Of course, the majority of the other starters threw innings into their late 30's and early 40's, with Phil Niekro going into his age-48 season. Only two other pitchers, David Cone and Pedro Martinez, pitched fewer than 3000 innings in their careers. Martinez's career was notably cut short due to mounting injuries—which led to ineffectiveness—occurring earlier in his career than in the careers of the majority of these other pitchers; Martinez's final season was at 37 years of age, earlier than any other pitcher on the list aside from Vazquez.

The topic of longevity seems pertinent given the sentiment that Vazquez has recently shared in light of this accomplishment:

"I don't think I'm going to stick around for 3,000," Vazquez said. "I'm not going to play for that long. This might be it."

Despite the fact that his recent performance has been stellar (since May 21, he has thrown 115 1/3 innings with an ERA of 3.36), Vazquez may be contemplating retirement after this season. For most pitchers who have established a decent career in the majors, this would be fairly early. One would expect that his success in the game would keep his services desired past the 2011 season. Just last season, however, he suffered through the worst season of his career, and earlier this year it looked like he was going to have the most significant fall for a pitcher of his caliber in the game's history. The turnaround has been spectacular, but perhaps he is tired of dealing with the rigors of baseball life and being away from his home and family. After all, one of the primary reasons behind his signing with the Marlins before the season began was the proximity to his home in Puerto Rico, so it would not be surprising if he was ready to retire despite the earliness of such an exit.

In part due to the lack of longevity compared to the other starters, Vazquez has the lowest pitching WARP total among them at 44.9 WARP. However, given that the lack of playing time is in part due to his career not being completed yet (the remaining pitchers have all finished their careers), it may be better to compare him to the others in terms of rate of performance. When looking at WARP produced per 200 innings pitched, Vazquez's career appears favorable, ranking 13th on the list with an average of 3.21 WARP per 200 innings. His standing places him right behind Gaylord Perry and ahead of Chuck Finley on the list, with notable names like Tom Seaver and Nolan Ryan just slightly ahead. Notable starters who did not average WARP at the same pace as Vazquez include Hall of Famers Steve Carlton (3.04 WARP) and Don Sutton (2.70) and soon-to-be Hall of Famer Tom Glavine (2.77).  Keep in mind, however, that since these pitchers have their stats from their late 30s and early 40s (when pitchers are in greater decline) averaged in, this isn’t exactly an apples-to-apples comparison.

When looking at WARP produced per season, Vazquez improves slightly to 11th place on the list of pitchers, settling in right next to Carlton and Fergie Jenkins. His 3.46 WARP per season compared to his lower value per 200 innings serves some testament to his durability; since the start of his career in 1998, he has failed to throw 200 innings in only four of his 13 completed seasons. In fact, among active starters, Vazquez and his 2802 innings rank behind just Livan Hernandez and Tim Wakefield, both of whom have pitched at least two more seasons than he has.

When looked at in these terms, the idea of where Vazquez really ranks as a pitcher makes sense. If his career were to end this season, there would be no argument to support him entering the Hall of Fame, but there have been pitchers who have pitched longer and, by the end of their careers, less effectively than Vazquez that have (or are likely to) make the Hall. While he has certainly had his share of strong seasons (seven seasons with at least 4.0 WARP), he has had enough down years to bring him to the level of a merely above average starter. His tools and workhorse pitching got him those 2500 strikeouts, but the concept of Vazquez as an underrated star pitcher is probably overstating his case. If indeed this ends up being his last season, Vazquez's career will not have been average (or worse) as some of his New York Yankees and Chicago White Sox seasons were. Neither will it be great as his 2009 season in Atlanta was. Perhaps at the end of his career, the perception of Vazquez as a pitcher will finally meet with the reality of what he accomplished.

Michael Jong is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Michael's other articles. You can contact Michael by clicking here

4 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links


During the first two months of the season when the Marlins were playing well, Vazquez was awful and probably should have been released. Since June, while the Marlins have generally been awful, Vazquez has pitched very well and no one, including himself, seems able to explain the difference, although his fastball seems to have a little more pop. How much of a factor has luck played in his turnaround or has it been legit?

Sep 06, 2011 07:59 AM
rating: 0
BP staff member Michael Jong
BP staff


I've kept a good eye on Vazquez over the past few months, and the changes seem real. His fastball has not just gotten "a little more pop," but actually gone back up to pre-2010 levels; he's back up to almost 91 mph after being in at 88-89 for a year and a month. Sure, some of it had to involve some luck, but when you look at his overall numbers, they've matched up with his career totals surprisingly well. Had those eight first starts occurred randomly throughout, I don't think we would have thought anything of it.

In addition, there was a plausible explanation for the sudden rise in velocity, attributed to pitching coach Randy St. Claire finding that he was not using his lower body as much on his delivery. The changes occurred almost immediately; the initial change was made in late May and from May 21 onward, his velocity stayed around 90 mph.

Sep 06, 2011 08:59 AM

Given his comment it definitely seems this season has dragged on him and the rest of the Marlins a good bit. Playing a professional sport is supposed to be difficult, but I hope he doesn't retire because he's tired of the stress and negative media attention.

Sep 06, 2011 11:16 AM
rating: 0

In his youth with the expos I made some cash betting on expos games he pitched because I got good odds and he always pitched above that sorry teams talent. For that reason he became my favorite non tigers pitcher. I thought when he moved to the Yankees having a good team behind him would elevate his game and he'd develop into a cy young winner (a pitching version of what granderson has done.) Obviously, that did not come to pass. The k rate speaks to a tremendous physical talent but the struggles under the ny microscope and the tender mercies of ozzie guillen suggest a deficiency in the immeasurable but equally important areas of "heart" and "guts". Pitching at a stellar level requires mental as well as physical toughness the inverse correlation between Javy's success and the pressures of contention suggest that's he's blessed with the former and not the latter.

Sep 06, 2011 17:56 PM
rating: -1
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Divide and Conquer, AL... (09/02)
<< Previous Column
Divide and Conquer, NL... (08/29)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Divide and Conquer, NL... (09/12)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Prospects Will Break Y... (09/06)

Fantasy Rounders: The Young and the Splitles...
Premium Article Minor League Update: Games of Thursday, May ...
Premium Article What You Need to Know: Bummed!
Premium Article The Prospectus Hit List: Friday, May 22
West Coast By Us: Day 1: In The Land Where E...
Premium Article Rubbing Mud: The Quarter-Season Odds Report
Going Yard: The Near Perfection of Pederson

Premium Article Future Shock: Top 10 Favorite Prospects of 2...
Premium Article Prospects Will Break Your Heart: Rangers vs....
Fantasy Article Value Picks: Outfield for 9/6/11
Premium Article Collateral Damage: The Season-Ending Injury ...
Fantasy Article Resident Fantasy Genius: Prospect Impact
Premium Article Divide and Conquer, NL West: Beating the Wea...

2011-09-14 - Fantasy Article Value Picks: Second, Short, and Catcher for ...
2011-09-12 - Premium Article Divide and Conquer, NL East: The Phillies' C...
2011-09-07 - Fantasy Article Value Picks: Second, Short, and Catcher for ...
2011-09-06 - Premium Article Divide and Conquer, NL East: The Curious Cas...
2011-08-31 - Fantasy Article Value Picks: Second, Short, and Catcher for ...
2011-08-29 - Divide and Conquer, NL East: The September S...
2011-08-24 - Fantasy Article The BP Trading Post: Top Catchers and Resurg...

2011-09-26 - Premium Article Divide and Conquer, NL East: The Surprise Wi...
2011-09-19 - Premium Article Divide and Conquer, NL East: The Importance ...
2011-09-12 - Premium Article Divide and Conquer, NL East: The Phillies' C...
2011-09-06 - Premium Article Divide and Conquer, NL East: The Curious Cas...
2011-08-29 - Divide and Conquer, NL East: The September S...
2011-08-22 - Divide and Conquer, NL East: Playoff Matchup...
2011-08-11 - Divide and Conquer, NL East: The Uggla/Ramir...