CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Fantasy Article Team Health Reports: B... (03/24)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Sp... (03/18)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Pr... (04/01)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Ahead in the Count: Pr... (03/25)

March 25, 2010

Squawking Baseball

How the NFL is Destroying MLB Mobile

by Shawn Hoffman

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

I started touching on this a bit a couple weeks ago in my MLB At Bat review, and at my blog: as good as MLBAM's technology is, and as amazing as At Bat is in a number of ways, MLB is, by all appearances, getting its butt kicked in mobile by the NFL. Yes, the stodgy old NFL, with almost no official presence on the iPhone, is killing MLB—makers of one of the most popular and celebrated mobile apps in the world right now—in the mobile content business.

Let's run through MLBAM's numbers once more for good measure. Last year, they sold about 1.2 million copies of At Bat for the iPhone at around $10 apiece. After Apple takes its 30-percent cut, MLB should have been left with about $8.4 million in mobile revenue, or about $3 million less than Carlos Silva made. I'm sure they also did a token amount of advertising and e-commerce revenue from MLB.com, but I highly doubt it was more than a couple million, incrementally speaking.

Now, on to this year: BAM has raised the price of At Bat to $15, and they should see a nice boost from having two major platforms to sell it on, as Android has finally seen some decent penetration in the last six months. Let's go really wild and assume they sell five million copies this year, despite the price hike; after Apple takes its share, it would result in a little over $50 million in revenue. Now we're talking about real money.

Right?

Well, even in that insanely optimistic scenario, MLB would still trail the NFL by $130 million in mobile revenue. Or, put another way, MLB would have to grow by two thousand percent this year in order to catch up.

How is the NFL doing this? They've hardly built any mobile technology; there are no tech blogs gushing over their products; they're not even on the iPhone, aside from a lame DirecTV app for NFL Sunday Ticket subscribers.

Turns out, it's actually pretty simple: the NFL auctioned off the rights to its mobile content to the highest-bidding carrier. In the past, that was Sprint. Now, it's Verizon; the nation's largest network just signed a four-year, $720-million deal with the league to be the exclusive provider of official NFL content on mobile phones. That $180 million per year figure is a fifty percent boost over the league's deal with Sprint, and it’s nearly as much as MLB Network brought in last year.

With this new arrangement, the NFL will also be offering users a lot more access—if you've had a Sprint phone in the past few years, you know how limited the old package was. But even with that given, it's still hard to say, pound for pound, whether the NFL or MLB is actually offering more value with their mobile packages. With At Bat, you get live pitch-by-pitch, Gameday Audio, box scores, and mobile access to MLB.tv (if you are a subscriber). That's pretty good, albeit with a few notable drawbacks—the player cards are terrible, MLB.tv is pretty useless on a device that small, and, something I should have mentioned in my review, there's no minor-league data to speak of. If you want to learn more about Alberto Alburquerque (great porn name, or greatest porn name?), you'll have to look elsewhere.

The NFL's offering certainly won't be perfect either, but based on reports, it'll finally be worth its while. For the first time, the RedZone channel, which covers every game and features lots of live look-ins (not unlike MLB Tonight), will be available on mobile, as will the full broadcasts of Thursday and Sunday night games. There will also be on-demand highlights, live radio broadcasts of every game, plus some fantasy stuff, ringtones, and the like. There's been no word on pricing yet, but based on what Verizon is paying for the rights, they'll have to charge a lot more than $15 to break even. (Although they could also make it relatively cheap and just focus on subscriber growth.) Regardless, this is something I would probably buy if I had Verizon, as long as it wasn't too outlandishly expensive.

Without the benefit of actually seeing the NFL's app, those two packages sound pretty even to me, with MLB probably getting slight an edge for technology and platform. (At Bat is available on the iPhone, Android, and Blackberry, whereas the NFL will only be on Verizon phones. Hopefully, the iPhone will be a Verizon phone at some point before I die, but I'm not holding my breath.) It all has to be really frustrating for MLB, considering they're offering more value with better core technology, and yet the actual money going to the leagues is mind-blowingly different.

If nothing else, they can take solace in the fact that the option will almost certainly be there for them in the future if they choose to switch strategies—Verizon has made content a huge focus, as they figure that the more exclusive rights they have, the wider a net they can cast in terms of luring new subscribers. It stands to reason that if MLB decided to sell exclusive mobile rights to their videos and Gameday Audio, Verizon (or some other carrier, for that matter) would be willing to pay far more than $8.4 million per year for it.

Is that the best approach? I'm not sure, honestly, but I'm pretty certain it's better than what they're doing now. As I've said before, charging $15 for your app is pure no man's land—it's far too cheap to generate maximum revenue (i.e. as compared to what they could get by auctioning off rights), but way too expensive to maximize reach. So what you're left with is a pretty damn good app and a very confused business model.

 I hate to say it, but this is nothing new for BAM; they've consistently made incredible, best-in-class technology, and then under-monetized it. I think their long-term vision is spot-on, but their short-term business decisions (at least on the media side) continue to be puzzling.

 

Shawn Hoffman is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Shawn's other articles. You can contact Shawn by clicking here

Related Content:  MLB Gameday,  NFL

6 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

Rowen Bell

I'm not really a "cell phone guy", so maybe my opinion needs to be taken here with a grain of salt...but it seems to me that demand for the NFL's cell phone product should be massively higher than demand for MLB's cell phone product, and hence the disparity in revenues is perfectly sensible.

The NFL's core product is delivered in a very small number of time intervals -- primarily, 17 difference 6-hour blocks. Moreover, those blocks of time are on Sunday afternoons, a time when people (even ardent NFL fans) may find themselves needing to be somewhere other than in front of a TV. As such, for NFL fans, having real-time access to NFL content on cell phones during those critical time intervals is really, really important.

By contrast, MLB's core product is delivered much more sparsely -- over hundreds of different blocks of time. As a result, it is comparatively far less critical for an MLB fan to 'need' real-time information about any one game. Also, the games are generally taking place in the evenings, when people are less likely to be unable to get in front of a TV if they really need to know what's going on in one particular game. Consequently, having real-time access to MLB content on cell phones seems like it would be much less important than for the NFL.

Mar 25, 2010 09:02 AM
rating: 2
 
baserip4

Interestingly, I think you can make the exact opposite argument just as reasonably: because baseball is delivered on an almost daily basis over 180 days (plus playoffs!), demand for mobile content should be very high since there are so many chances to take advantage of it.

Mar 26, 2010 10:08 AM
rating: 1
 
Wharton93

The NFL can put some pizzaz into a Chiefs-Browns game because sports betting is HUGE in the NFL. Betting drives so much of these trends, you can't really compare apples to apples whether it's mobile deals, or TV ratings. And if you are routinely gamblings $50/100/500 per game...you will for sure have no problem picking up some sort of NFL package. MLB doesn't have as many gambling addicted degenerates.

Mar 25, 2010 12:10 PM
rating: 6
 
misterjohnny
(925)

Some major differences between NFL and MLB
1) The ball is frickin' small. Tough to see a baseball on a tiny screen, should be easier to see a football.

2) Football is MUCH more popular than baseball. Look at how much directv is paying for NFL Sunday Ticket. Nobody was willing to pay even close to that much for exclusive MLB EI. Most carriers didn't want to have to pay for MLB channel to even get access to MLB EI

3) Look-ins are much more interesting in football. 70% of the time, a player makes an out. A "Scoring Position" channel would be rather boring.

Mar 25, 2010 14:05 PM
rating: 3
 
Ben L

Um, I think that directv's sunday ticket app is pretty great. At least when you're sitting on the beach in september!

Mar 25, 2010 16:27 PM
rating: 0
 
Deelron

I'm one who is more then happy that my phone provider is not buying exclusive access to the NFL for far to much money (and of course charging me for the privilege) and appreciate the MLB delivery method (which puts the onus on people who actually want to pay for the product, which I have). While I agree with the points made in the article, mark me down as someone who is very happy they're doing it "wrong".

Mar 25, 2010 16:28 PM
rating: 5
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Fantasy Article Team Health Reports: B... (03/24)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Sp... (03/18)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Pr... (04/01)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Ahead in the Count: Pr... (03/25)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Premium Article The Prospectus Hit List: July 1, 2015
Fantasy Rounders: The Slump Buster
Premium Article What Scouts Are Saying: July 1, 2015
Premium Article Going Yard: Futures Game: USA Bats
Premium Article Minor League Update: Games of Tuesday, June ...
Premium Article What You Need to Know: July 1, 2015
Premium Article Notes from the Field: July 1, 2015

MORE FROM MARCH 25, 2010
Premium Article Contractual Matters: AL West
Fantasy Article Team Health Reports: Tampa Bay Rays
Premium Article Ahead in the Count: Predicting BABIP, Part 3

MORE BY SHAWN HOFFMAN
2010-04-29 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Early Attendance Pattern...
2010-04-11 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Forbes' 2010 Team Valuat...
2010-04-01 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Predictions for 2010
2010-03-25 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: How the NFL is Destroyin...
2010-03-18 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Sports TV's Golden Age
2010-03-11 - Squawking Baseball: At Bat 2010
2010-03-04 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: LA Story
More...

MORE SQUAWKING BASEBALL
2010-04-29 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Early Attendance Pattern...
2010-04-11 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Forbes' 2010 Team Valuat...
2010-04-01 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Predictions for 2010
2010-03-25 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: How the NFL is Destroyin...
2010-03-18 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: Sports TV's Golden Age
2010-03-11 - Squawking Baseball: At Bat 2010
2010-03-04 - Premium Article Squawking Baseball: LA Story
More...